espanolbot: (Default)
espanolbot ([personal profile] espanolbot) wrote in [community profile] scans_daily2012-06-20 12:16 pm

LoEG: Century 2009 - Boy Meets God

A century long conspiracy to bring about the Antichrist comes to a head, and just when it seems all looks lost, an unexpected person comes to the rescue...

Triggerwarning for gore


I should note that her appearance isn't out of nowhere, she's appeared in the background series times throughout the series to my knowledge.





That's right, in the LoEG universe, Mary Poppins is either God or the most powerful being in the universe, and by extention, the entirety of fiction. Heh. And how she defeats the AntiHarry is actually kind of special to, to be honest.

Weirdly enough, this does actually make sense in the context of the novel itself, as one of the overall themes of the book is the progression of literature from having primarily male protagonists to female ones. There are numerous examples of this throughout the book, including the new M (Emma Peel, last seen in the Black Dossier under her maidenname Night) being the first of the characters who bore the title to actually be actively heroic in her own way.

A thing that amused me though, is after all the fuss that Moore and his fans have made over the use of his characters in Before Watchmen (even though they're technically DC's characters, and reimaginings of their other characters like Captain Atom, the Question etc. at that), the fact that he made the choice to overtly use other people's characters in this that are still under copyright to other people. Namely through his decision to use Harry Potter as the Antichrist, a thing hinted since the 1910 volume, as well as an explicit reference to both James Bond and the "JB is a title" theory that the director of Die Another Day claimed was canon.
bewareofgeek: (Default)

Re: Perhaps I shouldn't...

[personal profile] bewareofgeek 2012-06-20 04:38 pm (UTC)(link)
I'm starting to wonder if there's some metatextuality here, outside of the obvious Potter elements. Could Moore be saying, for example, that COMICS have become "mature" without the accompanying emotional development?

It would certainly fit his MO, and that one bit about MP's responsibilities has some useful material for that thesis.

Of course, I've only read what was posted, so it may have been either spelled or ruled out quite plainly.