auggie18 (
auggie18) wrote in
scans_daily2013-05-16 01:16 pm
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
Rachel Summers and Kitty Pryde: A Like-Like Story
Okay, so one of my favorite not-really-a-canon-couple couples is Kitty Pryde and Rachel Summers. (I guess her switching it to Grey didn't stick?)
Not there haven't been canon moments that hint at a slightly more intimate relationship. If you look at them in the right way. And are willing to see things that were probably not super intentional. (Then again, Claremont.)
ANYWAY!

What? Just some perfectly innocent full body hugging.

Yep. Just some good old heterosexual tucking in. Nothing more than that.

I, um. Huh.

...well.

Yep.

...hmm. (I know, I know, wrong Phoenix.)

D'aw.

I think I've figured out why Rachel's relationships tend not to last.

Ladies, take as much time as you need.
no subject
no subject
no subject
One of these days I'm going to sit down and read through a big pile of his comics and write some big essay about what he contributed to superhero comics and Marvel and how it's disappointing that he went absolutely bugfuck crazy in 1997 or so.
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
the "boy, I can!" seems too spontaneous and too immediately regretted.
(no subject)
(no subject)
Kurt's reaction
Re: Kurt's reaction
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
For others, like Storm/Yukio, it's even money whether he was actually going for a sexual relationship or not. Modern readers look at that and it's the gayest thing since gay came to gaytown, but back in the day it's coded as Yukio happening to be there when Storm ditched some things about herself that were holding her back.
Then when he comes back in the 2000s for X-Treme, all bets are off by the end of the volume and wackiness ensues. I honestly think that his being an Important Writer mixed with what was really a very experimental time at Marvel and you end up with the Claremont equivalent to Heinlein's Time Enough for Love: a perfectly decent plot that's heavily marred by characters expressing some eye-raising ideas.
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
no subject
Also, whoever Marie is, I got the impression from that pic that she's some kind of pet human the X-Men drag around in order to patronise.
"Aw, look! She lost an eye! Silly human with no healing factor." *Nuzzle* "Who's a good lil human? Who wants a human treat?"
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
So... have Rachel and Kitty still not spoken to each other in WatXM?
no subject
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
no subject
(no subject)
no subject
Speaking of Kitty/Whoever, I can't be the only one who read the Kitty/Emma sniping in Whedon's Astonishing X-Men as pure Belligerent Sexual Tension.
no subject
(no subject)