The Killing Joke: Original vs Recolored

[cyberghostface]

With the rerelease of 'The Killing Joke' a few years ago Brian Bolland opted to recolor the original art to his liking as John Higgins' coloring wasn't what he intended the book to look like. This of course has proven to be controversial and has been compared to George Lucas messing around with Star Wars.

I'm in the minority but I actually prefer the new recolors with some exceptions. The big difference is that the original is much more garish and psychedelic whereas the new colors are much more stark and muted.

My only real issue is that the original coloring is technically out of print and not at all available in a digital format. DC is rectifying this somewhat with 'The Absolute Killing Joke' which contains both coloring so hopefully the original will be available in some capacity in the near future.

The one bit where I prefer the original colors are the scenes with Joker's funhouse at the end.









So yeah I think given the surroundings and what Joker's trying to do the garish colors work better and the more muted look doesn't capture the insanity as well. The "throne" with Joker doesn't have that oompf with the plain colors.

Another big change was the flashbacks; in the new recolor they're all black and white except for the color red culminating with the helmet and cape of the Red Hood.





Ultimately I really like the black and white coloring with use of red but Joker bleeding from the eyes as opposed to just crying was in my opinion an unnecessary change. I prefer the idea that Joker is laughing and crying at the same time.

I think the ending scene between Batman and Joker works better with the new colors.









From a visual perspective I just think the scene works better with the more gothic coloring over the garish one. I think it's a powerful moment and one of the best Batman/Joker scenes and the psychedelic coloring doesn't suit the story as much when we're out of the funhouse.

Curious as to which colors you prefer and why.

Comments

[cyberghostface]

It’s heartbreaking how much they dropped the ball given how a Hamill/Conroy version was the Holy Grail for so many. I thought Mark Hamill singing was great though.

[alicemacher]

I liked for the most part the portion that adapted the book itself (the less said of the Batgirl prologue, the better), although some parts, such as the Joker's removal of the red hood and reaction to his new face, were a bit rushed for my liking, and Hamill's delivery was "off" at some points ("So why can't you see the funny side? Why aren't you laughing?" in a furious tone rather than a sad, weary one). On the other hand, I liked some of the new touches added to the main story, such as the Joker's creeeeeeeepy look of delight when the carnival lights are switched on, and the gangsters' reactions to the cop having words with the proto-Joker ("Somethin' you wanna tell us?" with a hand on the gun in the holster, and such.)

[cyberghostface]

Yeah I think those parts worked. I agree the "why aren't you laughing" bit was the biggest misfire for me in terms of Hamill's performance.

If I were to do it I'd probably have something more similar to BTAS for the art style. They were trying to find a compromise between Bolland and something that would be easier to animate but it just looked cheap at times.

Someone on YouTube did this edit with the original color and I think it might have worked.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1_r-qsxGiKY

[alicemacher]

Ooh, I like that. Kudos to the recolourer.

Not sure what I'd think of using the B:TAS style for the animation, but I agree it's pretty much impossible to really capture the spirit of Bolland's meticulously detailed line art in a cartoon adaptation, unless they were to use the anime (or John Kricfalusi) technique of painted stills for key moments. They could do all the cross-hatching they wanted in those. :D

[zachbeacon]

I totally get why they didn't go with the BtAS style. A lot of people would have assumed that it was a continuation since they were already using the same actors for Batman and the Joker.

Before the movie came out I saw a lot of people complain that they didn't just use Bolland's art style. I see this complaint nearly every time they do one of these movies.

After the movie I think most people just focused on the part I don't like; the gross Batgirl retcon they added to pad out screen-time. I didn't like it when it was implied in the Batman Beyond show (or when they confirmed it in the spin-off comics) and I still don't like it here. I'm not sure what's worse; that she's his student, that she's his adopted son's ex, or that she's his friend's daughter. It takes a lot to make me hate Conroy's Batman but this relationship manages to do it.

[cyberghostface]

In addition to that it was just boring. They should have just (if they had to have a half hour with Batgirl) adapt the first time she met Joker or something or scenes from 'Batgirl: Year One'.

[zachbeacon]

I sort of feel like the only reason they added the Batgirl stuff is so it hits you harder when the Joker shoots her. The thing is, the story isn't about the Joker assaulting Batgirl to get at Batman. The story is about the Joker assaulting Barbara to get at Jim (in order to get at Batman). If they'd replaced the disgusting Batman/Batgirl romance with some father/daughter stuff with Jim and Babs then maybe they could have added something to the story that wasn't completely pointless.

[kamino_neko]

Oh, more of Babs and Jim would definitely have been an improvement. I like that.