starwolf_oakley: Charlie Crews vs. Faucet (Default)
starwolf_oakley ([personal profile] starwolf_oakley) wrote in [community profile] scans_daily2011-01-20 11:42 pm

ILLUMINATI: Personal responsibility

Oracle once wondered if the Bat-family was culpable for the Joker's crimes since they never did anything permanent to stop him. Here's a few pages from the NEW AVENGERS: ILLUMINATI special where a similar discussion about culpability is discussed.





First, a page where the Black Panther shows how smart he is.



T'Challa's smart, but... The problem with the general public of the Marvel Universe is that they are idiots. Some of the smarter idiots are worried superheroes might subjugate those they protect. This isn't Tony's intention here. He just wants to subjugate other superheroes. Which he eventually does. Idiot.

The full two-page spread of Hill and Stark's conversation.



Spider-Man has a simple reason for not killing Osborn: Neither Aunt May nor Uncle Ben would like it. And Spider-Man is now the *only* Marvel Superhero who thinks killing people is wrong.
shanejayell: (Default)

[personal profile] shanejayell 2011-01-21 04:49 am (UTC)(link)
I've always felt Civil War was kinda... wrong minded. If anyone is 'responsible' it's the authorities who keep letting people like Osborn escape.

Clean your own house, Miss Hill, before pointing fingers at others.

[personal profile] warpedhand 2011-01-21 04:49 am (UTC)(link)
Eh, it's pretty clear in story at least that they were right about the Hulk.
freezer: (Wait What?)

[personal profile] freezer 2011-01-21 06:14 am (UTC)(link)
Umm... How many times did Spidey actually throw Osborn in jail? After Osborn went on his live TV murder spree is the only time I can think of.

Which is one less time than the govenment has put Osborn in a position of power.

Seriously: Fuck Civil War.
big_daddy_d: (Magneto)

[personal profile] big_daddy_d 2011-01-21 07:26 am (UTC)(link)
since we're on the subject of heroes being culpable for a villain's crimes, I would like to see a post from Ultimates vs. Ultimate X-Men because from what I remember, The Ultimates went after them all because of Magneto returning and kicking their ass..soo...they decide to go after the X-Men since..well Prof. X did lie about Mags being dead.
icon_uk: (Default)

[personal profile] icon_uk 2011-01-21 08:17 am (UTC)(link)
I think I had this discussion about Batman and the Joker a week ago, but the SHIELD grunt's POV is even less plausible.

A member of a vast covert ops organisation, which could (if it was competent) have Osborn executed for multiple murders in less time than it takes to type this sentence, and would be justified in doing so), is whining about a self appointed vigilante NOT killing? Lame.
e_307: (Default)

[personal profile] e_307 2011-01-21 08:47 am (UTC)(link)
Uh huh...Spider-Man should just snap his bad guys' necks...right...like that wouldn't have Hill and every other SHIELD agent crying that Spidey turned into a horrible murdering psychopath and launching some manhunt against him. And they'd probably put more effort into hunting down and squashing Pete than they ever did into keeping Osborn locked up.

[personal profile] hybrid2 2011-01-21 09:36 am (UTC)(link)
This is so stupid.

The heroes do theyre jobs right and stop the criminals.

It's the justice system that dont.

What is it with Mrvel always blaming other's insted of the peoples actualy responcible?
Like Speedball insted of Nitro.

I bet most people in the MU dont even know about Nitro.

[personal profile] thelazyreader 2011-01-21 11:08 am (UTC)(link)
I guess that's Bendis' viewpoint. Any other writer would have Iron Man throw that question back in her face with: "Since you guys think you know better than Spidey why don't you just put a bullet in Osborne's skull every time he's locked up and vulnerable?
tsunamiwombat: (Default)

[personal profile] tsunamiwombat 2011-01-21 11:40 am (UTC)(link)
T'Challa really is smart, and is clearly Marvels Batman. Too bad he keeps getting hit with the idiot ball thrown by other people.
vitruvian23: (Default)

[personal profile] vitruvian23 2011-01-21 06:17 pm (UTC)(link)
It's all BS. If Spider-Man succeeds in capturing Osborn and turning him over to the authorities, it's their fault if they fail to convict him or keep him incarcerated, not his. After all, it's not as though executing criminals on his own say-so would endear him to the public or result in him being tarred as a threat and/or menace any less often, would it? No, it would just confirm every fear the average Joe has about superhumans operating by their own set of rules and possibly taking things over from regular humans, and make him a fugitive who's wanted for actually breaking the law in a major way.

Even if you want to argue that the regular authorities are ill-equipped in cases like this, there are organizations in the MU set up just to deal with things like this that do have real authority under the law. The real question, therefore, is at what point does it become SHIELD's fault, or that of whatever organization takes its place.
fifthie: tastes the best (Default)

[personal profile] fifthie 2011-01-21 08:43 pm (UTC)(link)
Death: surely the thing that will totally eliminate the threat of Green Goblin forever, also, ensure that nobody has to worry about him ever again.

Bendis, you airhead.

[personal profile] jlbarnett 2011-01-21 11:06 pm (UTC)(link)
here's an test to see if this works. A criminal gets out of a long sentence by turning over evidence of other crimes in a plea bargain. He goes out and commits another crime and does the same. He always avoids a full sentence due to plea bargains and good behavior and always goes back to crime.

At what point should a cop decide to take it out of the legal system/prison systems hands and just shoot the guy?

[identity profile] fredneil.livejournal.com 2011-01-22 12:59 am (UTC)(link)
My take on Spider-Man not killing Osborn is that he'd enjoy it too much and he couldn't be sure whether he was doing it because it was the only way to keep people safe from him or if he was just going for revenge.

In other words, he's showing that superheros CAN be trusted not to abuse their powers and act as though they're above the law. He's living proof that the worst fears of the non-superpowered part of the Marvel Universe don't have to come true, and he's accused of being responsible for the Green Goblin because of it.
proteus_lives: (Default)

[personal profile] proteus_lives 2011-01-22 09:35 pm (UTC)(link)
If T'Challa's so smart, why won't he hand-out the cure to cancer? ;)