![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
Being a big fan of Stephanie Brown, I've been in a bit of a state of despair, but then I saw this panel on tumblr, wondering what people thought.
http://media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lmfpz5FppC1qd6q84.jpg
It's pretty blatant..." Here's a program that will enable you to "use your legs" again, and yet they haven't shown anything about it, per se - UNTIL a few months later BAM we have an image of Babs in the batsuit on the cover of a book. And here Bruce saying she can customize it however she wants, so, it doesn't have to look like the picture hence why her Batgirl costume on the released cover is different, but has some of the same..piping and look. What do you think? Do you think this new Batgirl book will actually be about Digital!Babs being Bruce's ghost in the machine and DC has taken the opportunity of her returning to "action" from being Oracle took the opportunity to over hype it as her "grand return" when it's not as...rebooty as one might think, just a new role for Barbara Gordon and a return to action.
Gail Simone has been rather outspoken about the response to the news, and there are times it seems it is indeed a true reboot given her comments, but then, there are times certain comments seem like they are trying to assuage fears but editorially not give too much information away as to pop the media bubble since it's getting LOTS of media attention. Part of me can't decide if I'm frustrated with her or am incredibly sympathetic for she now having to deal with the concerns of Stephanie and Casandra and backlash from Disability groups while still sitting on full details she can't reveal. She seems stuck between a rock and a hard place with it and has to kind of...censor what she says until she can say more?
What do you think? Why would Morrison have this if it was not going to be used? Is this just DC being extremely sneaky in advertising and by looks of it, getting exactly the result they wanted.
Thoughts? I'd hate to think this concept was scrapped so quickly, why else would they include it?

http://media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lmfpz5FppC1qd6q84.jpg
It's pretty blatant..." Here's a program that will enable you to "use your legs" again, and yet they haven't shown anything about it, per se - UNTIL a few months later BAM we have an image of Babs in the batsuit on the cover of a book. And here Bruce saying she can customize it however she wants, so, it doesn't have to look like the picture hence why her Batgirl costume on the released cover is different, but has some of the same..piping and look. What do you think? Do you think this new Batgirl book will actually be about Digital!Babs being Bruce's ghost in the machine and DC has taken the opportunity of her returning to "action" from being Oracle took the opportunity to over hype it as her "grand return" when it's not as...rebooty as one might think, just a new role for Barbara Gordon and a return to action.
Gail Simone has been rather outspoken about the response to the news, and there are times it seems it is indeed a true reboot given her comments, but then, there are times certain comments seem like they are trying to assuage fears but editorially not give too much information away as to pop the media bubble since it's getting LOTS of media attention. Part of me can't decide if I'm frustrated with her or am incredibly sympathetic for she now having to deal with the concerns of Stephanie and Casandra and backlash from Disability groups while still sitting on full details she can't reveal. She seems stuck between a rock and a hard place with it and has to kind of...censor what she says until she can say more?
What do you think? Why would Morrison have this if it was not going to be used? Is this just DC being extremely sneaky in advertising and by looks of it, getting exactly the result they wanted.
Thoughts? I'd hate to think this concept was scrapped so quickly, why else would they include it?

no subject
Date: 2011-06-08 04:09 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-06-08 08:26 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-06-08 04:10 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-06-08 04:33 am (UTC)Dan Didio has wanted Babs back as Batgirl for years, they almost did it during Oracle:The Cure, they were PLANNING it even while the Beechan Cass Cain mini-series was still being printed. When Steph became Batgirl, there was an ALMOST universal black-out on the Batgirl who existed between her and Babs (even said Batgirl was Steph's BFF and Oracle's ward-of-sorts), why should DC be any different here and pretend the Steph/Cass Batgirls never existed either?
And yes, I am very bitter about this, sorry...it just seems we've gone through this before.
no subject
Date: 2011-06-08 04:56 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-06-08 10:52 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-06-08 01:08 pm (UTC)Gail's a professional. And professionals don't air office politics, they answer to their superiors and toe the company line.
While I've always found Gail to be respectful online, but at the end of the day, DC pays her. And it's to them that she owes her loyalty to. Just because she has a generalized complaint about comics at large, doesn't mean we should really expect her to speak out against her bosses.
no subject
Date: 2011-06-08 03:28 pm (UTC)She's also spoken out against her bosses before, frankly, on a number of issues - One of the most recent ones being Didio's comment about Bane, and moving him away from what Simone has been depicting him as - Which she clearly wasn't too impressed by. I personally think she likes that she's a little more in touch with the fanbase than most DC creators are, but at the same time, because although it puts her in touch with the people who like her work, it also allows her to cover her back if necessary.
I've never bought her arguments that she wanted to put Cass in the book - To me, that's just her appeasing fans by saying she did her best.
no subject
Date: 2011-06-08 04:22 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-06-08 05:01 am (UTC)I mean, they said this Batgirl has dark secrets and all this go around, which means to signify it's "all new" but yeah...idk, this is interesting to me. Ever since I was reminded of this again I've gotten a bit less..panicked because that means the book is just changing focus or Stephanie and Cass are just going to be in Batman Inc because Morrison or the powers above OBVIOUSLY are showing some sort of plot point here we just haven't gotten to yet.
no subject
Date: 2011-06-08 05:19 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-06-08 10:36 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-06-08 03:31 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-06-08 03:47 pm (UTC)Whilst I like the idea of Dick as Nightwing too (weird red lenses to one side), the reason for Dick leaving his role, not so much Batman, as Damian's mentor and foil had better be bloody damn SPECTACULAR to be worth the loss of their dynamic, because I can't see Bruce and Damian being remotely as interesting as they currently stand. Unfortunately, powerful emotional beats have been where Morrison's Bat-run has been sorely, solrey lacking IMHO. A lot of bang, a lot of flash, but very little in the way of heart.
no subject
Date: 2011-06-08 04:31 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-06-08 05:09 am (UTC)I can't help but wonder whether, if they are absolutely determined to make Barbara Batgirl again, it might not be better just to quickly pull the Band Aid right off, so to speak, and do a full retcon rather than pulling it off in increments; either way's going to hurt, but the first option gets the pain over right away while the second option just makes it last longer.
no subject
Date: 2011-06-08 05:34 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-06-08 06:04 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-06-08 10:32 am (UTC)I hope this what they do, that way Stephanie can be BATGIRL or give herself a new moniker while Babs can be...this digital Batgirl that pretty much evokes her old self.
It seems too coincidental. I'm going to die if Stephanie Brown looses the bat ears though, she could just rename herself easily if they want to call Barbara Batgirl again.
no subject
Date: 2011-06-08 10:57 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-06-08 06:40 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-06-08 10:37 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-06-08 01:29 pm (UTC)Then again, that's pretty much what happened to Oracle. The greatest hacker on the planet in infected with a nano-virus capable to reproduction and regeneration, she has a copy of its source code in her photographic memory, and only thing she decides to do is have it yanked out.
Epic fail * 2.
no subject
Date: 2011-06-08 10:12 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-06-08 09:52 am (UTC)...yeah...
..right..
:(
no subject
Date: 2011-06-08 10:48 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-06-08 10:59 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-06-09 03:56 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-06-08 02:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-06-08 03:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-06-08 01:05 pm (UTC)"Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic." - Auther C. Clarke
I'll let you figure out how I feel from those two quotes, although knowing SD it'll end up probably being a question about why I hate Oracle.
no subject
Date: 2011-06-08 03:33 pm (UTC)She declared that Oracle shouldn't and wouldn't, from her perspective, get out of the chair until whatever does it is available to the DCU at large. This goes against that entirely.
no subject
Date: 2011-06-08 03:45 pm (UTC)So, yeah, the next generation gets to get excited about Batgirl "leaping, fighting, and swinging over Gotham," but what does "Mr. Oracle" get out of the deal?
Re: 10 chars
Date: 2011-06-08 08:18 pm (UTC)Re: 10 chars
Date: 2011-06-08 10:11 pm (UTC)Re: 10 chars
Date: 2011-06-08 10:12 pm (UTC)Re: 10 chars
Date: 2011-06-08 11:33 pm (UTC)Re: 10 chars
Date: 2011-06-08 11:34 pm (UTC)Mod note
Date: 2011-06-08 01:57 pm (UTC)Re: Mod note
Date: 2011-06-08 08:06 pm (UTC)Re: Mod note
Date: 2011-06-08 08:14 pm (UTC)You won't want to shrink it this time I think - the text would get lost.
Don't hesitate to ask if you find any more problems!
no subject
Date: 2011-06-08 02:01 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-06-08 03:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-06-09 04:38 am (UTC)Gail Simone has been so cryptic, and while some comments are offputting and really not very promising, there are other elements that suggest things might be okay and this is all PR doing it's evil advertising and hype and BOY is it creating hype.
ALSO this Batgirl might be something out of Flashpoint, like Zero Hour maybe, two Barbara Gordons and the current "Batgirls" have to go after her or something. It would just be a change in her perspective. Flashpoint is still really, fuzzy in how everything is going to turn out and then there's the allusion to 52 and the multiverse. There are so many things DC might not be telling us right away.
I honestly think DC really missed the boat to just do a whole Batgirl-like team book, not really a team but sort of Batgirl Inc really. That way everyone get's their favorite.