Your advised that making the reader have to go to abload to see the full image was a bad idea. You suggested just linking to the pictures using html as one alternative and pointed out there were a number of other possibilities.
Like I explained that time, I use thumbnails so that people who've read one of the books already but not the other can avoid spoilers.
"Like I explained that time, I use thumbnails so that people who've read one of the books already but not the other can avoid spoilers."
Why not split them into separate posts, then, and hide them behind the cut? That way you'd avoid spoilers AND avoid making readers click through on thumbnails.
Partly because this place gets so busy around Wednesday that posts quickly get pushed down, and I want to lessen that in some small way if I can. Though come to think of it, that's not as much of an issue lately. Traffic seems to have slowed down some.
And partly because if I'm including pages in the same post, it's because they're related in some way and I'm interested in people's reactions to them in the context of each other.
Founded by girl geeks and members of the slash fandom, scans_daily strives to provide an atmosphere which is LGBTQ-friendly, anti-racist, anti-ableist, woman-friendly and otherwise discrimination and harassment free.
Bottom line: If slash, feminism or anti-oppressive practice makes you react negatively, scans_daily is probably not for you.
OR, to do it properly
Date: 2017-05-17 06:08 pm (UTC)Re: OR, to do it properly
Date: 2017-05-17 06:13 pm (UTC)Re: OR, to do it properly
Date: 2017-05-17 06:14 pm (UTC)Why does it even need to be thumbnailed?
Re: OR, to do it properly
Date: 2017-05-17 06:20 pm (UTC)Like I explained that time, I use thumbnails so that people who've read one of the books already but not the other can avoid spoilers.
Re: OR, to do it properly
Date: 2017-05-17 06:36 pm (UTC)Why not split them into separate posts, then, and hide them behind the cut? That way you'd avoid spoilers AND avoid making readers click through on thumbnails.
Re: OR, to do it properly
Date: 2017-05-18 12:22 am (UTC)And partly because if I'm including pages in the same post, it's because they're related in some way and I'm interested in people's reactions to them in the context of each other.