One classic critique of superhero comics is to dismiss them as simple power fantasies, and say they're at least borderline fascist in their Might Makes Right tendency. That normally prompts defences describing all the other many things they can do -- the living metaphors, the moral play, the soap opera, the poetry, and a whole lot more. They're good defences.
But as I looked at chat around the big-two comics, I wondered whether we were just deluded.
There is so much conversation around power levels. Issues are picked over for more "feats" (characters showing their abilities at ever greater levels). The demands to make more characters "Omegas" (X-Men terminology for the apex mutants whose powers can't be transcended). I was especially unnerved when I saw people say the most powerful characters should be the leaders. There's a word for that.
-- Kieron Gillen
]
Issue 2 -

Not that I disagree with Gillen's general point...
Date: 2024-09-20 07:08 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2024-09-20 12:06 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2024-09-20 12:30 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2024-09-20 12:31 pm (UTC)The way Lux's dialogue makes it clear that his high-and-mighty talk is at least partially full of $#!%, and that a lot of his ethical moralizing is just him justifying whatever he really wants to do, is particularly effective. (Shades of "effective altruism"!)
no subject
Date: 2024-09-20 10:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2024-09-20 09:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2024-09-21 03:02 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2024-09-21 01:37 am (UTC)(Genuinely can't fault matter-of-factness like that.)