char: black canary/dinah lance,char: green arrow/oliver queen,char: green lantern/hal jordan, creator: Mike Norton,creator: Bill Sienkiewicz,Title: Green Arrow and Black Canary
And lol at the bashing-over-the-head with "DINAH AND OLLIE HAVE REALLY GOOD SEX, GUYS. THEIR RELATIONSHIP IS CRAP, BUT HOLY COW, DEY HAS FUN IN THE SACK."
Hal, you keep being the interruptus in their coitus. Fine by me.
Dinah, as the character she is now, has outgrown Ollie...this marriage should never have happened. They have a history...they dont "belong" to one another forever and always because it worked once many years ago. Urgh.
Gail, save her!!! BoP withdrawal is becoming overwhelming...
I once read somewhere that Ollie and Dinah are the only comic couple one can really imagine having normal people sex with each other, and I think that's right.
You know what I liked about this issue? There was mentioning of a Grell Road. Way to make a honorable mention of one of the main writers of the character in the past.
I once read somewhere that Ollie and Dinah are the only comic couple one can really imagine having normal people sex with each other, and I think that's right.
They pretty much had to demote BC to damsel in distress/sidekick in order to make it work. So if they had to "shrink" her to fit her with GA, then it can be said she had 'grown' past him before GA got a hold of her.
But yes, it always depends on the writer. I just know that I, and many others, appreciate the Black Canary that didn't have to be changed to make this marriage semi-plausible.
While the art is atrocious, I can't help shaking my head at the choice of Dinah's underwear. Those panties look ridiculously uncomfortable. Artist fail, I think. If she took one step, they look like they'd ride straight up between her cheeks. To be fair, underwear like that isn't designed to be worn for long periods of time, *cheeky grin*, but you'd think the artist would've put her in a thong, and been done with it.
I would hope it means "I have no ridiculously deep psycological issues and am unlikely to accidently kill you with superpowers." sex. Or it means having sex the same way non-superheroes have sex. Those are about the only non-offensive ways I can construe it, though.
Founded by girl geeks and members of the slash fandom, scans_daily strives to provide an atmosphere which is LGBTQ-friendly, anti-racist, anti-ableist, woman-friendly and otherwise discrimination and harassment free.
Bottom line: If slash, feminism or anti-oppressive practice makes you react negatively, scans_daily is probably not for you.
no subject
Date: 2010-02-12 01:22 am (UTC)Although the coloring ... yech.
And lol at the bashing-over-the-head with "DINAH AND OLLIE HAVE REALLY GOOD SEX, GUYS. THEIR RELATIONSHIP IS CRAP, BUT HOLY COW, DEY HAS FUN IN THE SACK."
no subject
Date: 2010-02-12 01:25 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-02-12 01:26 am (UTC)Dinah, as the character she is now, has outgrown Ollie...this marriage should never have happened. They have a history...they dont "belong" to one another forever and always because it worked once many years ago. Urgh.
Gail, save her!!! BoP withdrawal is becoming overwhelming...
no subject
Date: 2010-02-12 01:27 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-02-12 01:28 am (UTC)Slash goggles. I haz them.
no subject
Date: 2010-02-12 01:30 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-02-12 01:30 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-02-12 01:35 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-02-12 01:43 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-02-12 01:56 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-02-12 02:02 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-02-12 02:04 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-02-12 02:07 am (UTC)Just did as you suggested,so there no trouble.
no subject
Date: 2010-02-12 02:07 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-02-12 02:29 am (UTC)Dinah: I always said Hal wanted to get in bed with you.
Ollie: IT WAS JUST A ROAD TRIP! NOTHING HAPPENED!
Dinah: 0.0 .......
no subject
Date: 2010-02-12 02:40 am (UTC)I once read somewhere that Ollie and Dinah are the only comic couple one can really imagine having normal people sex with each other, and I think that's right.
no subject
Date: 2010-02-12 02:41 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-02-12 02:43 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-02-12 02:46 am (UTC)Normal people sex? As opposed to what?
no subject
Date: 2010-02-12 02:53 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-02-12 02:54 am (UTC)But yes, it always depends on the writer. I just know that I, and many others, appreciate the Black Canary that didn't have to be changed to make this marriage semi-plausible.
no subject
Date: 2010-02-12 02:56 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-02-12 02:59 am (UTC)Am I overthinking that?
no subject
Date: 2010-02-12 03:09 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-02-12 03:23 am (UTC)