When Justice League #1 debuted, I was worried that the pacing would be too slow, but this book is rocketing along at a speedy clip now.
The art is consistently crisp and frequently gorgeous.
Wonder Woman is a bit more naive and "fresh off the boat" here than I'm used to, but I have to remember that this is the Diana of five years ago, when she was new to our world. The modern day Diana over in Wonder Woman #3 is savvy and full of wisdom, so I'm not worried.
Young Hal is still kind of a show off and an idiot, but he's a consistently amusing idiot, so he gets a pass.
I LOVE this take on Wonder Woman. I could do without the sword, but man, this just feels pitch-perfect for a young Wonder Woman--brash, eager to see this new world and to whoop some bad guy ass. :D
I thought it was a hoot! Just a bit later, she tells the ice cream vendor that he should be very proud of this achievement (making ice cream cones, apparently). It has a lovely, goofy vibe, just lightening up the story a bit.
I remember reading that exact same scene ("..Ice Cream" "Ice Cream?" "Have you ever had an ice cream?" "No" tastes "Mmmh.. It's wonderful!" in Perez and then Byrne's run... why do we always need the exact same stories over and over...
DC's always done stories where the public temporarily turned against the heroes. This arc, set in a time when superheroes were new so the public didn't know what to think of them, is just the latest instance. I don't think it's meant to be the status quo of the present day DCU.
but in JLI they(civilians) blow up the Hall of Justice cause they want the gubmint away from their heroes. Most GLs are still cool with people. Aquaman is liked if disrespected
And Batman Inc still exists. That's a billionaire financing a private international mercenaries(the way it's setup suggests they're paid even if we know they aren't.) and people are cool with it.
It's just the public of the DCU having different opinions of different DC heroes. It's not really contradictory, no more so than the public loving the Avengers but hating the X-Men over at Marvel.
But that's one book, and the public attitude seen there seems limited to teenaged heroes. Look at, as jlbarnett pointed out, the GL books, Aquaman, Animal Man, Superman, etc.
There are only a handful of titles where superhumans are shown as mistrusted, as a class - JL, Action, and Captain Atom (which, aside from a handful of comments in issue 1, seems to be directed at Atom himself, almost entirely). Teen Titans comments on metahuman teenagers (in relation to Kid Flash) being dangerous, but the Justice League is treated as a reliable resource to go to on the matter, so clearly it's the teenager part that's the problem, made worse by their metapowers, not the metahuman part. (IE, typical 'KIDS THESE DAYS' nonsense with a metahuman twist.)
Flash and Batman both have individual issues with their respective local authority figures, but that's never suggested as anything but targeted at them.
Green Arrow has a bit of anti-superhero sentiment presented, but it's from the people who watch a supervillain's 'watch me kill!' feed, so you have to assume a self-selecting sample - and they like the villain, so it's the 'hero' part, not the 'meta' part that prompts the anti-hero commentary (especially since, in this case, it's aimed at a non-meta). (Plus Ollie's not that much less of a putz than he was before the relaunch, so there's likely to be some venom directed against him personally.)
JLI, the on-Earth segments of GLC and New Guardians, Animal Man, Mister Terrific, Static Shock, and Hawk and Dove all present them as well liked.
Resurrection Man and Superboy (and the majority of Teen Titans) treats them as a resource to be exploited, not something to be inherently feared.
None of the others set in the present - or recent past - present people with any strong opinion toward metahumans in general. (LSH, their relationship with the SP and UP government are the same as it's always been.)
Aliens are presented as being mistrusted, on the whole - thus Superman being particularly vulnerable to the PR attack he's currently suffering, some of the bits with Starfire in Red Hood, and the premise of Voodoo - but that's not quite the same thing.
But Superman seems to be doing pretty fine in terms of public approval over in his present day title, so you don't have anything to worry about on that particular front.
Usually yes. Strange unknown woman wandering around the capital city with a big sword, and casually pointing it at innocent merchants, that I can see being grounds for minor fear.
I think it's far more natural. Look at the cult of celebrity that exists in the real world and superheroes meltdowns are almost never discovered by the outside world to make it fall apart.
This is sort of a silly example, but consider how we treat "real life heroes". Like that costumed guy who was arrested and forbidden from teaching autistic children after being unmasked?
Maybe a less silly example would be how people generally treat cops. People hate them! Superheroes wouldn't be celebrities, they would be cops in colorful spandex.
Another pointless meta-moment. First it was Aquaman having to deal with being considered a joke in his fictional universe, which makes no sense. Now it's Superman voicing the fact that Diana is a "strong female character." It's sad to see creators using comics to have a dialogue with fans about... nothing.
It is somewhat worth mentioning when the next most powerful person besides these two, Hal, is a joke who needs to be told how to use his powers, then she just steps in and clears the room.
I kinda agree. I didn't mind the Aquaman stuff so much, but all I can see is Superman's eyes pointing in different directions and speaking in a caveman voice.
"GIRL IS STRONG." "uhhhh, I know."
And pointing with a sword? You don't do that in a polite, sword-wielding society, honey, much less a modern one. And AGAIN with the WHAT IS MODERN WORLD I AM CONFUSE.
And do we really need to harp on Batman not having powers? Again?
Perhaps she's just intentionally messing with people with the sword pointing, given the reception of "Go home, evil pagan!" she appears to have gotten from the public thus far.
But the fans have responded overwhelmingly positive to the Aquaman commentary. People have played the character completely straight several times, and it simply hasn't caught on as well.
It worked very well in the '90s when Peter David wrote series. He didn't waste time addressing the popular conception of Aquaman. He just wrote Aquaman as a powerful, intelligent, charismatic superhero, and that did the trick.
Founded by girl geeks and members of the slash fandom, scans_daily strives to provide an atmosphere which is LGBTQ-friendly, anti-racist, anti-ableist, woman-friendly and otherwise discrimination and harassment free.
Bottom line: If slash, feminism or anti-oppressive practice makes you react negatively, scans_daily is probably not for you.
no subject
Date: 2011-11-17 03:06 am (UTC)The art is consistently crisp and frequently gorgeous.
Wonder Woman is a bit more naive and "fresh off the boat" here than I'm used to, but I have to remember that this is the Diana of five years ago, when she was new to our world. The modern day Diana over in Wonder Woman #3 is savvy and full of wisdom, so I'm not worried.
Young Hal is still kind of a show off and an idiot, but he's a consistently amusing idiot, so he gets a pass.
Young Aquaman looks like he's going to be a hoot.
no subject
Date: 2011-11-17 03:08 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-11-17 03:08 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-11-17 03:11 am (UTC)Yeah, in your dreams, Hal. I love Wonder Woman and the little girl eating ice cream.
no subject
Date: 2011-11-17 03:39 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-11-17 07:00 pm (UTC)DCnU manages to constantly lower my opinion of him (seriously, why have him around instead of the multiple competent lanterns we know?).
Wondy, however, is love :)
no subject
Date: 2011-11-17 03:44 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-11-17 04:32 am (UTC)"I know."
Goddamn, that is awesome. Wonder Woman is amazing here. She's so nonchalant about how cool she is. It works!
no subject
Date: 2011-11-17 05:21 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-11-17 11:00 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-11-18 05:25 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-11-18 05:46 am (UTC)But I'll just say I do not like this Diana. This is just a spacier version of the Diana I've never liked, with less personality.
You know what Diana is awesome? Brian Azzarello's and Cliff(motherfucking brilliant) Chiang over in WONDER WOMAN. That's who. And not "cute."
Dibs Hal?
Date: 2011-11-17 06:06 am (UTC)Re: Dibs Hal?
Date: 2011-11-17 07:53 am (UTC)Re: Dibs Hal?
Date: 2011-11-17 12:49 pm (UTC)just so I can watch him get punched in the face.
no subject
Date: 2011-11-17 09:20 am (UTC)"Dibs" I see Hal's perfectly in character here :P
no subject
Date: 2011-11-17 09:28 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-11-17 11:59 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-11-17 12:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-11-17 02:55 pm (UTC)Although in any universe, it's perfectly acceptable to soil your underwear when confronted by Batman.
no subject
Date: 2011-11-17 03:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-11-17 09:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-11-18 01:47 am (UTC)And Batman Inc still exists. That's a billionaire financing a private international mercenaries(the way it's setup suggests they're paid even if we know they aren't.) and people are cool with it.
no subject
Date: 2011-11-18 02:12 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-11-18 05:30 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-11-18 05:27 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-11-19 06:38 am (UTC)There are only a handful of titles where superhumans are shown as mistrusted, as a class - JL, Action, and Captain Atom (which, aside from a handful of comments in issue 1, seems to be directed at Atom himself, almost entirely). Teen Titans comments on metahuman teenagers (in relation to Kid Flash) being dangerous, but the Justice League is treated as a reliable resource to go to on the matter, so clearly it's the teenager part that's the problem, made worse by their metapowers, not the metahuman part. (IE, typical 'KIDS THESE DAYS' nonsense with a metahuman twist.)
Flash and Batman both have individual issues with their respective local authority figures, but that's never suggested as anything but targeted at them.
Green Arrow has a bit of anti-superhero sentiment presented, but it's from the people who watch a supervillain's 'watch me kill!' feed, so you have to assume a self-selecting sample - and they like the villain, so it's the 'hero' part, not the 'meta' part that prompts the anti-hero commentary (especially since, in this case, it's aimed at a non-meta). (Plus Ollie's not that much less of a putz than he was before the relaunch, so there's likely to be some venom directed against him personally.)
JLI, the on-Earth segments of GLC and New Guardians, Animal Man, Mister Terrific, Static Shock, and Hawk and Dove all present them as well liked.
Resurrection Man and Superboy (and the majority of Teen Titans) treats them as a resource to be exploited, not something to be inherently feared.
None of the others set in the present - or recent past - present people with any strong opinion toward metahumans in general. (LSH, their relationship with the SP and UP government are the same as it's always been.)
Aliens are presented as being mistrusted, on the whole - thus Superman being particularly vulnerable to the PR attack he's currently suffering, some of the bits with Starfire in Red Hood, and the premise of Voodoo - but that's not quite the same thing.
no subject
Date: 2011-11-18 01:52 am (UTC)That's the kind of reaction DC citizenry should have to heroes
no subject
Date: 2011-11-18 05:32 am (UTC)But Superman seems to be doing pretty fine in terms of public approval over in his present day title, so you don't have anything to worry about on that particular front.
no subject
Date: 2011-11-17 09:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-11-18 03:27 am (UTC)Something about the civilians loving superheroes never felt right to me.
no subject
Date: 2011-11-18 10:51 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-11-18 04:52 pm (UTC)Maybe a less silly example would be how people generally treat cops. People hate them! Superheroes wouldn't be celebrities, they would be cops in colorful spandex.
And people would despise them. :p
no subject
Date: 2011-11-18 10:44 pm (UTC)Hee Hee Hee
Date: 2011-11-17 11:03 am (UTC)Like she suddenly appeared on a chariot pulled by pegasii and started talking to everyone in her Royal Amazonian Speaking Voice.
Imagining her yelling everything she's saying at the top of her lungs makes the scene a lot funnier.
Re: Hee Hee Hee
Date: 2011-11-17 07:01 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-11-17 02:11 pm (UTC)"I know."
Another pointless meta-moment. First it was Aquaman having to deal with being considered a joke in his fictional universe, which makes no sense. Now it's Superman voicing the fact that Diana is a "strong female character." It's sad to see creators using comics to have a dialogue with fans about... nothing.
no subject
Date: 2011-11-17 02:56 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-11-17 07:02 pm (UTC)Makes a splash, she does :)
no subject
Date: 2011-11-17 08:02 pm (UTC)"GIRL IS STRONG."
"uhhhh, I know."
And pointing with a sword? You don't do that in a polite, sword-wielding society, honey, much less a modern one. And AGAIN with the WHAT IS MODERN WORLD I AM CONFUSE.
And do we really need to harp on Batman not having powers? Again?
bleh. Just all reads dumb.
no subject
Date: 2011-11-17 09:15 pm (UTC)Totally agree on the sword situation though.
no subject
Date: 2011-11-18 01:44 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-11-18 04:56 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-11-18 06:15 pm (UTC)