Date: 2011-12-17 07:18 am (UTC)
stubbleupdate: (Default)
I like his notion that sexified women in games (like the Arkham examples) are "walking prostitutes") becase a) Are prostitutes not normally known for putting one foot in front of the other? and b) sexualised = available for sex?

I've only read through the first three paragraphs and I've felt compelled to comment already.

What is the rest of the article like?


... chicks already have final fantasy and phone games... "What you're asking for is an end to things that you find offensive. This is ridiculous" ...social gaming will end gaming as we know it...don't like it don't buy it.

Oh dear
This community only allows commenting by members. You may comment here if you're a member of scans_daily.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Profile

scans_daily: (Default)
Scans Daily

Extras

Founded by girl geeks and members of the slash fandom, [community profile] scans_daily strives to provide an atmosphere which is LGBTQ-friendly, anti-racist, anti-ableist, woman-friendly and otherwise discrimination and harassment free.

Bottom line: If slash, feminism or anti-oppressive practice makes you react negatively, [community profile] scans_daily is probably not for you.

Please read the community ethos and rules before posting or commenting.

July 2025

S M T W T F S
   1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 212223242526
2728293031  

Most Popular Tags