Set the Wayback machine machine for 1903, Sherman. Let's see what horrendous deviltry Buster Brown is up to today. Richard F Outcalt created the comics page HOGAN'S ALLEY in 1895 for the newspaper WORLD. It may or may not have been the first American comic strip, depending on definition; I'm content to accept it as a very early one and its star, the Yellow Kid, as a very early comics character. (I think the Yellow Kid deserves a close look, soon, as well. His strip was a good example of humor and satire making a strong statement together.) Anywhat, Outcalt moved on to create Buster Brown.


The funniest thing about the strip, to me at least, is the dog. Tige has that cosmic awareness where he can look out at the reader and say, "This oughtta be good!" or "Look out Ma! You'll break the hairbrush!" Buster was so insincere with that "Resolved!" at the end of each page. He was forced to do it and it obviously sank into his conscience as deeply as Bart's blackboard message on THE SIMPSONS.

This young fellow obviously worked for EC Comics, but he also turned out some fine art for Warren, Marvel and DC. He went on to be an editor who helped create many characters and books which are still favorites today.
The funniest thing about the strip, to me at least, is the dog. Tige has that cosmic awareness where he can look out at the reader and say, "This oughtta be good!" or "Look out Ma! You'll break the hairbrush!" Buster was so insincere with that "Resolved!" at the end of each page. He was forced to do it and it obviously sank into his conscience as deeply as Bart's blackboard message on THE SIMPSONS.
This young fellow obviously worked for EC Comics, but he also turned out some fine art for Warren, Marvel and DC. He went on to be an editor who helped create many characters and books which are still favorites today.
no subject
Date: 2009-03-06 08:53 pm (UTC)And with Buster Brown--how can you TELL he's in girls' clothes, given his normal look? I swear, mothers at that time were really trying to mess up their kids' minds.
In all seriousness, out of historical interest, does anyone know just where this weird turn of the century trend of little boys all prettied up with golden locks and so forth originated? (And how long it lasted)
no subject
Date: 2009-03-06 09:01 pm (UTC)Definitely Orlando.
And I believe that photo of him is used in one of the text sections of Watchmen, talking about the history of comics in Earth-Watchmen.
One very much like it is used, in any case.
no subject
Date: 2009-03-06 09:06 pm (UTC)Which made me think, dang, he's making this too easy, given WATCHMEN is not exactly hard to have seen.
no subject
Date: 2009-03-06 09:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-06 10:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-06 09:12 pm (UTC)Buster Brown suffered a fashion trend very common in the late 1880s to early 20th Century. I think the popularity of the book LITTLE LORD FAUNTLEROY started it, but young boys were dressed as rather androgynous dandies for a generation. It was considered ritzy and upper-class. There was also the widespread feeling in that era that sexuality was nasty and dirty and shameful, and that kids before adolescence did not have any sexual feelings because they were pure and innocent little angels.
no subject
Date: 2009-03-06 11:45 pm (UTC)My guess had been that a lot of mothers then wanted girls, like in the later-generation lyrics to "I'm a Boy." And this was a way of compromising.
no subject
Date: 2009-03-07 12:36 am (UTC)There's a photo of HP Lovecraft in deCamp's biography. Little Howard is about a year or so old, wearing a white dress and with shoulder-length blonde curls. Of course Lovecraft turned out perfectly normal and well-adjusted..
no subject
Date: 2009-03-07 03:36 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-08 12:02 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-08 01:02 am (UTC)FDR, though, dressed that way is particularly funny. Though you may want to image-zoom here:
no subject
Date: 2009-03-06 09:56 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-06 11:46 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-07 10:46 am (UTC)You can tell that whoever drew it was used to a different sort of art - I'm guessing commercial illustration, probably. But it's experimenting with little cartoon details, like with the facial expressions and eyes. The contrast with the old-style faces is a little off-putting.
no subject
Date: 2009-03-07 01:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-08 01:04 am (UTC)