More Birds of Prey nostalgia!
Apr. 24th, 2014 10:49 pmI started reading Birds of Prey in trades, so, needless to say, I never had the chance to read the bulk of the pre-Simone run of the series, until quite recently, when I managed to acquire the complete run of the series. When I saw the following two pages, I knew I had to post them. There's no interesting subtext, no subtle allusions or foreshadowing, or anything like that. Just plain old badassery. Quick summary of the plot: a team of federal marshals were transporting a group of supervillains from the Slab, the special prison in the DCU for holding supervillains, to STAR Labs, when the train, along with Black Canary and Catwoman, gets sucked through a boom tube to Apokolips, and soon comes under attack by Darkseid's military. Canary and Catwoman leave to try to steal a mother box to get back to earth while the marshals and the supervillains try to hold off the parademons. And here we go:




no subject
Date: 2014-04-25 04:23 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-04-25 11:18 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-04-25 05:18 am (UTC)And I like seeing Greg Land stuff from the 90s. It reminds me of what a good artist he was before he started tracing / stealing
no subject
Date: 2014-04-25 05:38 am (UTC)And it's not at all terrible or even odd that you find an original character more interesting than a knock-off character.
no subject
Date: 2014-04-25 11:22 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-04-25 11:40 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-04-25 11:47 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-04-25 02:42 pm (UTC)that said, i loved her much more as Oracle. but i would never call Barbara/batgirl a knock off....
no subject
Date: 2014-04-25 03:04 pm (UTC)However, Barbara!Batgirl actually originated on the 60's TV show, so I guess in that sense she could be considered a knock-off (maybe?).
no subject
Date: 2014-04-25 03:13 pm (UTC)and i would say the comic character was inspired by the tv character, however, if i recall correctly they both came out at the same time. and one in anticipation of hte other.
no subject
Date: 2014-04-25 04:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-04-25 05:08 pm (UTC)can we PLEASE stop calling Batgirl(s) knock offs?
no subject
Date: 2014-04-25 06:58 am (UTC)I know, night and day isn't it?
-(Also is it terrible that I think Barbara is much more interesting as Oracle than as Batgirl [partly because I like Cass so much]?)-
I feel the same way, Oracle was a much more unusual, complex character.
no subject
Date: 2014-04-25 07:36 am (UTC)Not even remotely...
no subject
Date: 2014-04-25 11:25 am (UTC)As Batgirl, she's a third-rate superhero in tights in a city full of superheroes in tights. Someone else (Stephanie, Cass) could fill that role easily. There's nothing particularly special about her now.
no subject
Date: 2014-04-25 01:19 pm (UTC)Gail Simone recently said during one of the recent conventions that she sees Barbara as the smartest of the Bats, and.. I just don't see it. The current Barbara is a miserable, incompetent, blathering tool of a character who doesn't have one twentieth of the old version's smarts. Oracle, on the other hand - before Simone arguably disastrously derailed her with that Death of Oracle arc (even though Oracle had never really played that support network role super-heavily since the demolition of the clocktower, which saw the Birds leave Gotham, thus rendering Simone's point moot) - entirely unique, arguably, in the DCU. A disabled character who was still physically capable in ways that other characters like her weren't, thus making her inspirational? A different role, an application of intelligence rather than hitting stuff? Oracle was awesome. Batgirl right now is just a hot mess, whose miserable book is overshadowed by Batwoman, which could be similarly angsty but is being handled far better, even with the changeover in creators. I just think Simone is far too attached to the character, doesn't really have any idea of how to write PTSD, and is taking the mandate of 'no happiness EVER' from DC's editorial way too seriously.
no subject
Date: 2014-04-25 02:54 pm (UTC)Oh yeah, it had slipped my mind until you said that; I remember her saying just that during a WonderCon panel this past weekend. She also gave what I believe to be the worst answer to objection to Benes' art (which was raised in a question) that I've heard; I think even someone who likes his art would've raised an eyebrow at it. Anyway, have definitely not been impressed with Simone's writing of BG in the new 52.
Anyway, I agree. Oracle WAS awesome, and I miss her dearly.
no subject
Date: 2014-04-25 03:16 pm (UTC)What was the objection and her answer, out of curiosity?
no subject
Date: 2014-04-25 03:01 pm (UTC)i would argue that Cass and Stephanie brought different, yet equally important things to the role of batgirl.
Cass brought a new sense of purpose to the role of batgirl. A character that was loyal to an ideal not just a person. and a person who was not only one of the greatest fighters in the world, but who's "dark past" doesn't hinder her. There was a sort of innocence Cass had (which is not to be mistaken for naivete) she tended to believe the best in people. And in the hands of any other writer, the Death Wish angle would have felt contrived. but it made sense for her.
Stephanie on the other hand brought something the other bats didn't. a sense of hope. She made the Bat symbol be more than a symbol of fear to the criminals. but a sign of hope. I don't think that was something she could do as Spoiler. Could she still be the same as Spoiler as she was as Batgirl? sure. But she made the Bat stand for Hope. Something it hadn't stood for in a while. especially conscidering the RIP. Also what i loved about her was that BQM turned her from the screw up of the Batfamily, to the one who kept on standing up even if she screwed up.
no subject
Date: 2014-04-25 03:32 pm (UTC)I do agree about Steph and Cass, though. Again, I feel that both of them really contributed more to the role than Barbara is currently, which feels more rooted in nostalgia than anything else. It's a shame, since I like Barbara in other material, just not the current book.
no subject
Date: 2014-04-25 03:08 pm (UTC)