Spider-Man: Reign
Jul. 4th, 2015 12:38 pm
Spider-Man: Reign is in my opinion one of the more underrated Spidey stories out there. There's a bit of a "all there is to know about 'The Crying Game'" twist that's overshadowed the rest of the story. It's also been derided as a knock off The Dark Knight Returns (and the similarities are acknowledged with a character called 'Miller Janson') but in my opinion all they have in common is the concept of an aging superhero being called out of retirement. Simply put, Spider-Man and Batman are two very different characters -- you're not going to see Spider-Man as a hardened vigilante beating the crap out of Captain America. They're also products of two different periods; TDKR takes place during the Cold War, while Reign (although the connection is not as explicit) draws parallels with a post-9/11 America.
Also each issue was double-sized.
#1 starts...




Peter comes across the kids but doesn't intervene when one is taken away. He is shoved aside and breaks one of his arms.




Peter finds a guest at his door.

Jonah has a package for Peter and tells him to open it. Outside, he provokes the Reign agents into attacking him.


Spider-Man makes quick work of them.



#2...
The return of Spider-Man is causing big problems for Mayor Waters. His assistant, Saks, has a plan.
















#3...
Jonah is taken to Mayor Waters.








The Webb system covers New York just as symbiotes attack the city.



The ringing causes the symbiotes to retreat.

Peter has gone inside the coffin.




#4...




I'm cutting out the section where Peter fights the Sinister Six to make room for other stuff. The one thing that bothers me a little is that Spider-Man has no problem killing them; he manages to get Electro and Hydro-Man to kill each other, he throws Scorpion out a window, etc. There's not much of an explanation I suppose except for he's old and can't take chances?

After Spider-Man fights Mysterio, Kraven inhales the fear hallucinogens so that fear will be on his side.



On one hand, I really liked the Sandman daughter storyline. On the other it really comes with little build up (Sandman doesn't do much until then). I actually asked Andrews on Twitter about the reasoning for it and his response was this.



Waters attempts to flee but is stopped by Sandman, who tells him that he has what he wants. Waters begs him not to hurt him, but Sandman can't make any promises.




Outside, a kid asks Jonah what this means. "It's a second chance."

no subject
Date: 2015-07-04 05:31 pm (UTC)...A lot of this feels like Andrews ought to have had a co-writer.
no subject
Date: 2015-07-04 06:30 pm (UTC)"Those are children! You can't shoot them!"
"That's appeasement talk! You're one of THEM!"
I wonder if Sandman's daughter led to "different aspects of Flint's mind are personified in sand" stories that were done in both AMAZING and the Ultimate Spider-Man cartoon. But this seems to be an actual daughter that inherited his powers, not the personification of Flint's "inner child."
no subject
Date: 2015-07-04 06:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-07-04 07:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-07-05 12:24 am (UTC)Brief bit got posted once...
Date: 2015-07-05 04:22 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-07-04 06:48 pm (UTC)that sand must've gotten everywhere, especially in his wide open mouth!
no subject
Date: 2015-07-04 07:03 pm (UTC)I can see why that can be appealing though, in the way that melodrama tends to be. But it's just dripping with it in a way I've never really seen in a piece of fiction.
no subject
Date: 2015-07-05 05:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-07-04 08:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-07-04 09:39 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-07-05 12:36 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-07-05 12:48 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-07-05 03:22 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-07-04 09:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-07-04 09:35 pm (UTC)For a story blatantly ripping off TDKR, it's got a lot more heart, is a lot more hopeful, and I actively found it more enjoyable than it's inspiration. The use of some of the characters was spot-on, and I liked the development of Venom into a being genuinely upset that Peter had unceremoniously dumped it, and even Jonah's turnaround to *needing* people like Peter is a pretty great riff on the classic characterisation of deciding to tear him down because he can't be as good a man as him.
So.. Yeah. This is a really great Spider-Man story, to me.
no subject
Date: 2015-07-05 05:17 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-07-05 08:42 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-07-06 02:41 am (UTC)I think another draft or two- add some earlier bits with Sandman to make that even stronger, remove the most eye-rolly bit- and this'd be a much more widely praised story.
no subject
Date: 2015-07-05 03:11 pm (UTC)Well, Kaare Andrews has absolutely no one to blame but himself for that; he put "Spider-sperm OMG" on a note on a table in a room at the heart of his story, and left it there for the readers to find. There are a bunch of different ways that Andrews could have tweaked that plot device to make it less risible.
For a story blatantly ripping off TDKR, it's got a lot more heart, is a lot more hopeful, and I actively found it more enjoyable than it's inspiration.
I agree--as remarkable as TDKR was in its time, it hasn't aged well at all--and, again, that seems to have come largely from Andrews' deliberate artistic decision, specifically the one to imitate Miller as inked by Klaus Janson. (Other art of his doesn't really look like that at all.)
no subject
Date: 2015-07-05 03:22 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-07-06 03:00 pm (UTC)If nothing else, if you want people to take the issue of exposure to radioactive semen killing Mary Jane Watson seriously, nodding to the Incy Wincy Spider as a metaphor probably isn't very helpful to achieving that particular goal.
no subject
Date: 2015-07-05 12:26 am (UTC)If this is the last Spider-Man story, that's not a bad way to go.
no subject
Date: 2015-07-05 03:56 am (UTC)Maybe with Parker, especially when he talks about MJ and we see his inner dialogue. That makes it more personable. Same with Sandman and his daughter. But everywhere else, the dialog feels unnatural, like it's more trying to get a point across poetically, but not in the context of the situation itself.
I can see why some people would like it, and also why people would react negatively. To me at least, I just felt I've seen it done better in Dark Knight Returns. I hate to keep comparing it, but even the choice of art style and the ever-grinning TV hosts and politician is very much like DKR's, but DKR simply did it better.
no subject
Date: 2015-07-05 05:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-07-05 04:24 am (UTC)And the radioactive fluids bit never stops being painfully bad.
no subject
Date: 2015-07-05 05:19 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-07-05 05:38 am (UTC)Also any toilets he's peed in.
no subject
Date: 2015-07-05 08:43 am (UTC)And where's all the radiation coming from, anyway? He was bitten by one piddly irradiated spider; that's less radioactive material than you ingest by eating a couple of bananas. Unless Peter's turned into a living nuclear reactor, he shouldn't be throwing off any more radiation than the average person.
no subject
Date: 2015-07-05 08:46 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-07-05 07:23 pm (UTC)I'm not asking for comics to make scientific sense, mind. It's just weird for him to be permanently radioactive when he never got a significant dose of the stuff in the first place, and he doesn't have an "generate radiation" theme to his superpowers.
no subject
Date: 2015-07-05 07:29 pm (UTC)If the science gets handwaved enough that the spider gives him all of his abilities, and there's pre-existing stories with elements of this, I don't see the issue.
no subject
Date: 2015-07-05 11:30 pm (UTC)And there's certainly no scientific problem with him being radioactive, yet safe to touch or stand near. Alpha radiation is stopped by the skin, so if he's emitting that, he'd be harmless as long as his fluids didn't actually end up inside you.
no subject
Date: 2015-07-05 08:44 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-07-05 04:19 pm (UTC)Seriously, that's what his cameo in Spiderverse was.
no subject
Date: 2015-07-05 06:39 pm (UTC)