Marville #6-7: Duh End
Aug. 10th, 2015 10:16 am
"You're trying to pin this on us?! Marville failed sales-wise because we couldn't accept your grand vision of world peace? We only wanted superheroes punching each other. Go to hell! Your comic didn't succeed because it started as a lame, unfunny parody of the comic book industry and then it was an inaccurate, moronic tale about God and the universe. It failed because it SUCKED!"- Linkara
Writer: Bill Jemas
Artist: Mark Bright
Inker: Paul Neary
Colorist: Transparency Digital
Well here is the end... let's get it over with.













The finally ends with this word from Bill Jemas...

Now, after this is Marville #7, the submission guidelines to Epic imprint. I could have easily skipped over this since it had nothing to do with Marville as a whole. However, I'm going to post some of the instructions and information provided in it. It's rather interesting to read, especially after all of this time and looking at where Marvel currently is now and with their approach to books.










And that my friends and trauma victims, is Marville. Easily one of the worst comic books to have ever been created and one of the ugliest things Marvel has ever published (it stands right alongside Ultimatum, Avengers #200, Ultimate FF, and One More Day). What did you think?
no subject
Date: 2015-08-10 04:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-08-10 04:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-08-10 06:37 pm (UTC)I've never read it. I honestly have a morbid pseudo-obsession with tracking it down one day, for I have heard it is the most awful of awfulness.
no subject
Date: 2015-08-10 06:41 pm (UTC)Yes.
no subject
Date: 2015-08-11 12:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-08-11 01:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-08-11 01:56 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-08-12 03:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-08-10 04:54 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-08-10 05:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-08-10 05:21 pm (UTC)Also, keep in mind that the 2003-2004 Epic was a revival of the name of an imprint they had in the 80s and 90s - which published such series as Elfquest, Groo, Sam & Max, the English translation of Akira, and Moonshadow.
no subject
Date: 2015-08-10 05:01 pm (UTC)Which is just as well, because the submission guidelines in #7 make my head hurt. On one page, Jemas says, "EPIC will not publish books that duplicate Marvel's current lineup." On the next, he says, "the EPIC books with the best initial sales potential will feature the major Marvel heroes and teams."
On another page, Jemas says that "pretty close to nobody" cares about Ghost Rider. In the very next paragraph, he says, "But Marvel would love to publish a new Ghost Rider book under the EPIC imprint."
...Does Jemas actually read the stuff that comes out of his head? Does he even care about making sense? I don't even know.
no subject
Date: 2015-08-10 05:10 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-08-11 07:28 am (UTC)No one wanted to read Blue Beetle after Ted Kord was killed in a crappy storyline and then an ethnic minority kid version was parachuted in... and then we got Jaime Reyes awesome series.
And so on
no subject
Date: 2015-08-10 05:31 pm (UTC)I can't get past the drawing of Wolverine. Frank Quietly does not always do good work, does he. Good old Logan looks... like he wants to take me out back and do something unpleasant to me without consent or lube. BAD TOUCH.
I like how Jemas takes a dig at turning the Hulk intelligent and gray because apparently that's something Marvel would NEVER do. Except when Jemas' arch-nemesis PAD did so.
And the shots Jemas takes at DC, Image, and indie publishers.
Wow, this really was the bottom of the barrel in so many ways.
no subject
Date: 2015-08-10 11:51 pm (UTC)Grey-and-smart Hulk was interesting. He actually went out and did stuff. The conflict was not all repetitive and artificial. That was the best run of Hulk.
Also, I do not like Quitely's art at all, on anything he's done that I've seen. With the right inker, I find his work tolerable.
no subject
Date: 2015-08-11 02:42 am (UTC)I've often thought that, as demonstrated by Spudverine above, it should be "hideous potato people with duckface".
no subject
Date: 2015-08-11 03:21 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-08-11 12:22 pm (UTC)The Hulk was a top selling comic under PAD for well over a decade, so Jemas is just spewing bile, here.
Also, admitting he doesn't really understand his own product line? [Slow Golf Clap]BRAVO, sir{/slow golf clap]
no subject
Date: 2015-08-11 12:02 am (UTC)Also, I'm not really sure that Dark Phoenix does work as a metaphor for being replaced evolutionarily. After all, it's not as though Dark Phoenix gives Jean Grey the power to have more surviving offspring.
The truth is, though, that powers are just a plot device. You want to tell a story about a character that flying to other planets and having space adventures, you need to give him the power to fly to other planets in some reasonable amount of time and do interesting things when he gets there. Maybe that means a power ring, but it could mean something else.
Any superpower can be interesting, and any superpower can be lame. It all just depends on the story you tell about how the character uses that power. Aquaman has superstrength, incredible reflexes, super-sharp senses, and telepathy, but the character is still lame. (Sorry Aquafans, but you know it's true.) Namor is very much the same basic concept, but somehow manages not to be lame. But Namor's powers aren't a metaphor for anything. He has the power to fly, apparently because of the little wings on his ankles, which is ridiculous, but somehow the character still works in a way Aquaman does not. (My guess is that they use Namor as an antagonist at least as much as as a hero.)
Neanderthals aren't animals. They're a sub-species of Homo Sapiens.
Date: 2015-08-11 01:05 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-08-13 07:30 am (UTC)So, wait, why did the adult heroes in the whole rest of the Marvel line except X-Men sell so well in the 1960's?
I suspect Marvel did well in the 1960's not because of metaphors (gag) nor "classic archteypes" nor "iconic" trademarks--but because they were new, different, and current. Too bad that by the time they hired Jemas, they'd thrown that away.
If they want to catch the kind of lightning Lee & Ditko caught with Spider-Man, they may need a new project with creators that have the kind of commitment Ditko, and then Johnny Romita, brought to Spider-Man. And better marketing and distribution then Jemas had.
And accessible stories, he's right about that. But he doesn't seem to get what makes stories work. Grey Hulk was cool. Married Spider-Man at least had the potential to be cool (and it actually was popular for a while). Hey, even She-Hulk replacing the Thing in the FF was pretty cool, because it was something surprising and different--and accessible. Change is OK.
no subject
Date: 2015-08-13 07:36 am (UTC)It really looks like he doesn't really get marketing; the product has to deliver what is marketed. If you're going to use naked(ish) women on the covers to sell the book, have the inside of the book have some connection to the naked women on the outside. If you want to write a dry story about philosophical pantheism, give it a cover that will attract the readership for a dry story about philosophical pantheism.
I don't know what he was thinking, Maybe he was trying to lose the bet?