Having seen the other scans before editing. I really don't like the trend of portraying Chill as some really horrible person. Because I think it's kind of weak to write him as this hate sink for Batman to take his frustrations out of. I'm far more interested in a story where Bruce hunts down and confronts Chill and finds not a monster from his childhood, but a sad old ex-con who killed a couple of people decades ago because of desperation and a twitchy trigger finger.
Mind elaborating on the cut content and how Chill's portrayed there?
I'm strongly agreed with you though, Joe Chill shouldn't be a monster outside of Batman's imagination. The idea of of the adult Batman having to confront and understand that disconnect is much more interesting and complex than yet another revenge story. I mean, shit, Frank Miller of all people understood that, going out of his way in TDKR to have Batman realize that Joe Chill was just a desperate crook, not a bogeyman.
In the cut pages, Chill is irreverent about killing the Waynes and kind of smirks of the power over life and death he had, and he also admits he killed forty people before that.
Seriously, forty people is a fucking ridiculous body count for a petty criminal.
Yeah, 40 people is a fucking ludicrous number, that's well into serial/contract killer territory, and even within those categories it's well above the average.
I do think someone who kills two innocent people in cold blood (and would have killed a third), twitchy trigger finger or not, is a monster, even if he never killed again. It actually makes him more of a monster than just adding to his body count, because killing the Waynes, destroying a family, destroying a child's psyche, destroying all the good they would do for Gotham and for the world, all for some small crime (which never even profited him since he didn't get the pearls) for no reason (like shooting a store clerk when you rob them of chump change) is so senseless and so petty, so...small...that it makes Joe Chill less sympathetic, not more. I actually like stories that have Chill haunted by his crime (in prison or not) for the rest of his life, not only is it a change from the multitude of Gotham super-villains who kill and don't think twice about it, but because he really should be haunted by it. In a few seconds, Joe Chill not only destroyed lives, he created Batman and everything that has come with him.
It feels weird to see a rendering of the Joker with a more realistic face, given how the slightly elongated look has become a standard. All the more jarring given that the artist is "covering" famous panels and covers.
I will say, the idea of Batman psychologically torturing and then mindwiping Joe Chill for no reason beyond his own personal satisfaction is a pretty good way of showing the power of the Mobius Chair as potentially corrupting him.
I seem to have a vague memory... didn't Batman express some small sliver of doubt at one point about forcibly wiping someone's memory being 100% ethical?
In this was Bruce behaving normally, maybe not. However, this scene just shows how powerful he's become, where he can just boom into Joe Chill's cell and terrify him... purely out of spite and revenge. He wasn't going to escape any time soon, he wasn't necessarily doing anything wrong at that moment, Batman just did this for his own twisted satisfaction.
The abuser left on Themyscira? Not one iota of sympathy for him.
I prefer Bruce discovering that Chill is some old, washed-up petty crook, too, but that doesn't change the enormity of his crime. Jittery trigger finger or not, he killed two people (I don't buy the forty) and that alone is worth him paying for it.
While they're doing it? Understandable. Priorities. It's after the fact that's the crux of the thing. Our reaction to the act afterwards is noteworthy. "Justice! Vengeance." Or "What caused this to happen, and how can we fix it?" Destructive, or constructive. Cyclical, or progressive. The big question is: How do you choose to react to hurt?
I can't find the book right now, but wasn't Chill in Endgame? Where Joker was reenacting Thomas and Martha's murder? I honestly can't remember if he was characterized in any way other than he didn't want to be there.
Founded by girl geeks and members of the slash fandom, scans_daily strives to provide an atmosphere which is LGBTQ-friendly, anti-racist, anti-ableist, woman-friendly and otherwise discrimination and harassment free.
Bottom line: If slash, feminism or anti-oppressive practice makes you react negatively, scans_daily is probably not for you.
no subject
Date: 2015-10-29 12:30 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-10-29 12:35 am (UTC)EDIT: Never mind, its a mini. Editing.
no subject
Date: 2015-10-29 12:59 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-10-29 01:22 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-10-29 01:34 am (UTC)I'm strongly agreed with you though, Joe Chill shouldn't be a monster outside of Batman's imagination. The idea of of the adult Batman having to confront and understand that disconnect is much more interesting and complex than yet another revenge story. I mean, shit, Frank Miller of all people understood that, going out of his way in TDKR to have Batman realize that Joe Chill was just a desperate crook, not a bogeyman.
no subject
Date: 2015-10-29 01:42 am (UTC)Seriously, forty people is a fucking ridiculous body count for a petty criminal.
no subject
Date: 2015-10-29 02:00 am (UTC)But hey, who cares about nuance or logic, right?
no subject
Date: 2015-10-30 03:06 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-10-29 11:58 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-10-29 08:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-10-29 05:27 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-10-29 01:26 am (UTC)I will say, the idea of Batman psychologically torturing and then mindwiping Joe Chill for no reason beyond his own personal satisfaction is a pretty good way of showing the power of the Mobius Chair as potentially corrupting him.
no subject
Date: 2015-10-29 02:15 am (UTC)Remember, these are New 52 Amazons.
no subject
Date: 2015-10-30 03:09 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-10-29 01:27 am (UTC)I liked Finger's solution better.
no subject
Date: 2015-10-29 05:42 am (UTC)Really, it doesn't work. Even Batman parodies wreck it.
no subject
Date: 2015-10-29 05:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-10-29 02:32 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-10-29 03:52 pm (UTC)I prefer Bruce discovering that Chill is some old, washed-up petty crook, too, but that doesn't change the enormity of his crime. Jittery trigger finger or not, he killed two people (I don't buy the forty) and that alone is worth him paying for it.
no subject
Date: 2015-10-30 11:02 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-10-31 03:00 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-11-01 04:20 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-11-02 12:23 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-11-06 03:51 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-10-29 10:53 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-10-30 11:04 pm (UTC)