Wonder Woman Origin
Sep. 19th, 2016 06:08 pm
After reading Wonder Woman #4/5 I'm a little confused about where this origin story is going.
With the rebirth issue we see Diana with confused memories which seems to be from pre-crisis, post-crisis and 52. She smashes a mirror and tries to get to Themyscira and fails. The costume shown in the panels seems to be what she has debuted in when returning Steve to mans world but where are they going with the previous incarnation memories? Can someone explain if they understand.





no subject
Date: 2016-09-19 10:31 pm (UTC)Rucka is trying to reconcile past iterations of Diana (mainly from what he wrote, what came after, and the new 52, and solidify it. Rather than throw it all out (it wouldn't make sense given the new 52) since there was some good stuff that came about. but he is trying to throw out all the stuff that just didn't work.
no subject
Date: 2016-09-19 10:39 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2016-09-19 10:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2016-09-19 10:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2016-09-19 10:52 pm (UTC)I hope "born of clay" is a euphemism....
Date: 2016-09-20 12:28 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2016-09-20 01:19 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2016-09-20 01:21 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2016-09-20 01:30 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2016-09-20 03:54 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2016-09-20 04:16 am (UTC)(Thomas Wayne, Richard Parker, Ben Parker, Howard Stark, Jor-El, Zor-El, Martin Jordan, Brian Banner, and Jack Murdock all wave forlornly from their table in the back...)
But no, seriously, I know what you mean. She was a character born of two mothers--Hippolyta and... was it Aphrodite who originally brought her to life? I know it says "the Greek gods" but I remember at one point they specifically said it was one of the goddesses--anyway, she didn't have a traditional father and that was okay.
no subject
Date: 2016-09-20 09:12 am (UTC)Perez amended to that to make it a convocation of goddesses after Artemis plan to create a new race of beings (with Ares demurring) was refused by Zeus and who together utilised souls of murdered women that had been kept for a special predestined purpose. Artemis, Athena, Aphrodite, Demter and Hestia were repsonsible.
Our esteemed member Bluefall made a great post on the topic some years back.
https://scans-daily.dreamwidth.org/957548.html
no subject
Date: 2016-09-20 05:06 pm (UTC)Although given that Azzarello's run literally begins with Zeus (apparently) deader than a doornail and that it wasn't really fixed until the end of his run, it's not like they didn't get their "Dead Parental Figure" cake and eat it too :P
no subject
Date: 2016-09-20 10:57 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2016-09-20 11:53 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2016-09-20 12:41 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2016-09-20 02:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2016-09-20 02:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2016-09-20 02:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2016-09-20 05:23 pm (UTC)(As an aside note, reading your other comments, I am starting to get the impression scans_daily miiiight not be the place for you.)
no subject
Date: 2016-09-20 05:27 pm (UTC)No I think is tight more on her character who want to recontnect the amazone with the other world.
no subject
Date: 2016-09-20 05:30 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2016-09-20 05:36 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2016-09-20 05:43 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2016-09-20 05:51 pm (UTC)I must admit I have some difficulty to expose my tought in english.
no subject
Date: 2016-09-20 06:01 pm (UTC)"Wanting to go out and explore the world and fight injustice" is enough of a motive without involving daddy drama. It's not required, like you said, and honestly I'm bored enough with father issues without tacking them onto a notably female-rooted and female-centric superheroine.
no subject
Date: 2016-09-20 06:39 pm (UTC)Je suis content qu'il est rajouter un père pour Wondy car vu que c'est une icône féministe je trouver dommage de n'accès se message que sur les femmes même si elles sont toujours le cœur de cette idée.
Au vu de ce statue il est normal qu'elle soit lié à un ou plusieurs personnage masculin, ça limite moins le message et permet de faire comprendre que son message est universelle.
Après je demande pas qu'elle soit très proche de son père ou que cela devienne une figure centrale de la vie de WW, mais le fait qu'elle est un père comme tout le monde rend le personnage plus "humains".
no subject
Date: 2016-09-20 06:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2016-09-20 06:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2016-09-20 07:14 pm (UTC)Mais si je vous comprends bien, vous disez que les gars ne pouvant pas rapporter à Diana, ou les histoires de Wonder Woman, parce qu'il n'y a pas un homme là-dedans, et ça, ça c'est... concernant. Un homme ne peut pas se rapporter à une femme, pas de tout?
no subject
Date: 2016-09-20 07:23 pm (UTC)Et puis ne me vouvoie pas ça en se fait pas sur le net.
no subject
Date: 2016-09-20 07:33 pm (UTC)Voyons, on a toujours dit aux femmes qu'elles doivent rapporter aux hommes dans les livres, dans les films, au télévision, mais quand il est dans l'autre sens, soudainement c'est "ces femmes, quelle créatures étrange et mystérieuse!" Nous pouvons nous voir en Superman, ou Batman. Ils sont universels. Mais pas les super-héroïnes--et pourquoi?
On m'a toujours enseigné à utiliser 'tu' avec la famille ou les amis.
no subject
Date: 2016-09-20 07:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2016-09-20 07:45 pm (UTC)Mais vraiment, elle a déjà une mère, des sœurs, des amis--et puis elle fait des amis avec les hommes et les femmes hors de l'île. Il y a beaucoup des gens qui n'ont pas un père, et ils se entendent très bien.
no subject
Date: 2016-09-20 07:54 pm (UTC)C'est que tout les personnage existant donné un Père à WW est osé.
no subject
Date: 2016-09-20 05:46 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2016-09-21 02:20 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2016-09-21 05:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2016-09-21 05:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2016-09-19 11:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2016-09-19 11:48 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2016-09-20 10:07 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2016-09-20 01:17 pm (UTC)I'm not sure there's any differences in what she's wearing in the two stories that aren't attributable to the different artists. Some slight differences in the saturation of the reds, and the detailing, but I wouldn't think they're working from different iterations of the design, just that Scott's got a lighter hand than Sharp, and Faraldo and Martin have different eyes for colour.
no subject
Date: 2016-09-20 03:43 pm (UTC)I was referring to the costume in this page:
http://i.imgur.com/EVYMFRV.jpg
The one detail I'd change is that I think it would look cooler if the eagle's wings were the top of her bra, rather than a band across her breasts. But really, even as it is, it's the second best version of her costume I've ever seen. Really awesome.
(The best version, imo, is the Earth Two version here: http://www.toyarena.com/images/761941319902a.jpg http://www.oafe.net/yo/art/dcdnew52e2ww2.jpg)
no subject
Date: 2016-09-20 03:53 am (UTC)I'm just not sure how to feel about Hera and Hephaestus now being among the patrons who give Diana her gifts.
no subject
Date: 2016-09-20 08:12 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2016-09-21 01:31 am (UTC)And although it not shown in these pages I like how Nicola Scott gives Wonder Woman the dorkiest smile.
no subject
Date: 2016-09-24 01:17 pm (UTC)On reflection this seems silly on multiple levels. For one, we're reading a comic in English, not in idiomatic Amazonian. For another, I don't really even want the Amazon culture to be so demonstratively focused on gender that there are no words for a male protector or authority figure.That feels like it reduces them to a shallow caricature, a 21st (or worse, 20th) century institutional patriarchy with the genders flipped is exactly what I don't want the Amazons to be.
But still... it feels like Amazon thought really ought to be female-default, y'know? It's hard to get that across in a way that sounds natural to readers, because words like "matron" that could be used instead have very different connotations to us and it makes the word choice that should be incidental and natural seem very deliberate and political -and that takes you out of the dialogue. And yet... Isn't that difference in connotations of otherwise synonymous gendered language part of what the Amazons exist to critique in the first place? And yet. And yet. And yet.
To me this is really hard to grapple with, but also very interesting. How can you keep Amazon culture distinctive and central to their portrayal and still slip it in "under the radar?" Is that even what the objective should be? Am I making mountains out of molehills?
Thoughts?