Bottom line: If slash, feminism or anti-oppressive practice makes you react negatively,
Please read the community ethos and rules before posting or commenting.
Links
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags
| You're viewing Create a Dreamwidth Account Learn More | Reload page in style: site light |
no subject
Date: 2012-12-28 11:53 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-12-29 12:05 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-12-29 12:09 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-12-30 01:32 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-12-30 04:57 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-12-31 12:59 am (UTC)If everything they did with OMD was planned out, because they were planning to have Octavius take over Peter's body, and they didn't want to deal with the idea of MJ sleeping with Otto in Pete's body, then, while I still would have hated OMD, I would understand the logic, and maybe appreciate them sparing us the skeeviness of this.
But they did OMD, the put Otto in Pete's body, AND NOW THEY'RE PUTTING MJ AND PETER/OCK TOGETHER AGAIN.
They went though all the trouble of splitting them up, make a scenario where we could easily avoid this skeevyness, and then they dive right into the skeevy.
This is like burning down your home for the insurance, and then calling up the insurance company and CANCELING YOUR POLICY.
This is beyond insanity.
no subject
Date: 2012-12-29 12:04 am (UTC)Please stop drawing.
no subject
Date: 2012-12-29 12:28 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-12-29 12:39 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-12-29 01:28 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-12-29 02:36 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-12-29 02:38 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-12-29 02:56 am (UTC)Not so here. Stop, before our eyes are irreparably damaged.
no subject
Date: 2012-12-29 04:55 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-12-29 01:24 pm (UTC)Instead, I believe it is enough to say that Ramos' work in the pages being shown here is far from his best, or even his average: see the 'love' panel, above. That kinda -hurts-.
no subject
Date: 2012-12-29 11:30 pm (UTC)(Ramos was really single-handedly responsible for making Bart Allen visually unique.)
no subject
Date: 2012-12-30 03:03 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-12-30 01:47 pm (UTC)Problem is, IMHO, that he's less consistent than usual in these panels.
For a comparison, see the final pages in the same issue (the "Otto going through Peter's memories" scene comes to mind, among others), which come off a whole lot better in my eyes.
no subject
Date: 2012-12-29 12:08 am (UTC).. I must get her to call me that in bed. "
no subject
Date: 2012-12-29 01:32 pm (UTC)This is, after all, before their final confrontation and the "Superior" oath; though Otto going after MJ is clearly a can of worms waiting to be open, as others are pointing throughout the thread.
no subject
Date: 2012-12-29 12:15 am (UTC)Because this raises all sorts of issues that I don't think Marvel can answer. The closest I can think of them doing on the subject was when the Skrull posing as Hank Pym got Tigra pregnant and Marvel's response to the whole thing was basically to ignore that fraudulent activity had taken place.
(I live in California, which has a "Rape by Fraud" law on the books. Which is exactly what it sounds like. Where the perpetrator gains the victim's consent through deception or fraudulent actions. Taking over the body of another person and pretending to be that person would definitely fall under that definition.)
no subject
Date: 2012-12-29 12:26 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-12-29 12:40 am (UTC)But I totally do agree with erring on the side of caution with issues like this.
(And I do think it would be in exceptionally poor taste to have this be the reason MJ leaves the title again, not even being able to stand seeing Peter's face because of what happened, when Peter makes his return should they go down that road.)
no subject
Date: 2012-12-29 11:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-12-29 12:30 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-12-29 12:32 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-12-29 02:32 am (UTC)Laws governing it are still a little shaky; this one just doesn't come up very often. In real life, body swapping and evil duplicates are somewhat scarce. However, identical twins and siblings who are not identical but close enough to pass in dim light occasionally do occur. So for a case like this to happen and end up in court, you need to have a situation where someone looks/sounds enough like someone else to fool the victim, is enough of an evil asshole to take advantage of that fact, but somehow have the victim realize during or after that it was someone else.
It HAS happened from time to time; unfortunately, the law often wasn't ready to deal with that kind of situation (archaic rape laws requiring use of force as part of the definition, say) and the guy walked.
no subject
Date: 2012-12-30 01:20 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-12-29 10:14 pm (UTC)Yes, yes it is. Mary Jane is only consenting because she thinks she'd be sleeping with Peter, however, if shew knew it was Ock in Pete's skull, you'd be damn sure she'd want nothing to do with him.
So yes, this is very much rape.
no subject
Date: 2012-12-29 12:59 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-12-29 06:29 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-12-29 07:05 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-12-29 08:55 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-12-29 02:12 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-12-29 04:40 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-12-29 08:09 pm (UTC)What if he forgets he's Otto but still has Otto's personality?
Like, he has "episodes" where he forgets the mindswap even happened and he thinks he's Peter.
And then he wakes up in bed with MJ remembering that he's Otto, wondering what happened?
I think one point we'll see addressed is that even if he forgets he's Otto and has all of Peter's memories, he still won't BE Peter.
And by the end of this, I suspect we'll see Peter vs. a Superior Spider-man who no longer even remembers being Doc Ock but still isn't a good person, even with Peter's memories and none of Ock's.
no subject
Date: 2012-12-31 04:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-12-31 09:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-12-29 12:51 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-12-29 12:51 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-12-29 02:40 am (UTC)Fixed that for you.
no subject
Date: 2012-12-30 05:31 pm (UTC)Unlike when this sort of thing normally happens (and only in comics will I ever be able to type THAT sentence) Ock has access to all of Peter's memories. When he tells MJ her favorite things, well, only Peter is going to know things like that. There isn't going to be a case of:
"This is just like our trip to London."
"Ah yes, London, I loved it there."
"Fiend! We've never been to London! Who are you, really?!"
That ain't happening here. Most of his miscues are for the reader; the people around him are not generally going to know them or notice. Regardless of how cutesy meta writers like to get these days, most of the non-superhero cast is never going to notice anything wrong with him. They may never notice because he can placate them with intimate details only Peter could ever know.
no subject
Date: 2012-12-31 07:21 am (UTC)Maybe their first instinct won't be to think that it's some impersonator (or maybe it should be, this is the sort of thing that has happened before), but it would require an astounding degree of obliviousness on their part to realize, whoa, Peter's acting really differently!
no subject
Date: 2012-12-31 07:35 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-12-31 07:57 am (UTC)Nope!
no subject
Date: 2012-12-29 12:58 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-12-29 01:02 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-12-29 01:08 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-12-29 01:19 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-12-29 01:02 am (UTC)Also, I'm shocked Marvel would go down this road again. After the controversy that followed the subplot with the Chameleon, I thought they would have learned from that mistake. I obviously gave them too much credit.
no subject
Date: 2012-12-29 01:43 am (UTC)Just because Doctor Octopus has access to all of Peter's experiences, memories, feelings, and so on, he's still, for all intents and purposes, a stranger in the body. He's not a trained actor or impersonator - he's not Mysterio or Chameleon to hop into someone's life and take it over. He's not going to act the same, move the same, or talk the same, and how can Mary Jane or Aunt May or any of the dozens of heroes who've worked with Peter not realize that something is wrong?
I'm reading this dialogue, and it's just so far from what Peter would say, what he's ever said, that it should be raising red flags in anyone who's known him for any amount of time... especially a ex-girlfriend/ex-fiancee/best friend who's slept with him and known him intimately.
ESPECIALLY someone who knows he's a super-hero. ESPECIALLY someone who as good as lives in a world with clones, doppelgangers, time travelers, alternate dimensional counterparts, Life Model Decoys.
I... I'm not opposed to the idea in general, but if MJ, of all people, doesn't suspect something is up from the way Peter talks, acts, behaves, responds - hell, how he KISSES - then I'll be sorely disappointed.
Tell me that Daredevil won't pick up changes in body language/heartbeat/tones.
Tell me that Logan won't sense something's off.
The only way this can seriously work long term is if a lot of people are extremely stupid, or Otto Octavius is a much better actor than we ever imagined.
no subject
Date: 2012-12-29 02:37 am (UTC)Tell me that Logan won't sense something's off.
Tell me freaking AUNT MAY won't slip ambien into his oatmeal raisin cookies. Because she does that.
no subject
Date: 2012-12-29 06:25 pm (UTC)This could have worked back when Spidey was still playing Public Enemy in the early years and rarely teamed up with other heroes, but at this point he's on multiple teams and is good friends with some of these people, they would absolutely catch on. And if the Avengers or the FF or whomever realizes what's going on then this whole thing falls apart, because they would have to step in. Not only is Ock a fugitive from justice and a grade a asshole, but he's masquerading as their friend and teammate. To not do something about it, be that trying to bring Peter back or to even just throwing Ock in prison where he belongs, would be morally reprehensible, and this storyline would have damaged even more characters than it already has.
no subject
Date: 2012-12-30 12:12 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-12-29 01:48 am (UTC)This also echoes a controversial subplot by Fred Van Lente from three years ago6, where the Chameleon, also disguised as Peter, made advances on Peter’s then roommate, Michele Gonzeles, which resulted in what appeared to be them about to engage in sex on their kitchen floor (though Marvel clarified they were just “swapping spit.”) Now with “Spider-Man” and Mary Jane “newfound romance,” Marvel’s on the verge of venturing into the same treacherous waters only a thousand times more turbulent and destructive. And DC and Marvel wonder why they still have trouble courting female readers.
no subject
Date: 2012-12-29 02:40 am (UTC)Or look at it. I think MJ grew a cheekbone in there.
And, yeah, there is no way MJ would not notice that Peter's speech pattern is, oh, completely off.
Sigh.
no subject
Date: 2012-12-29 02:42 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-12-29 11:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-12-31 06:25 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-12-31 07:43 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-12-31 09:36 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-12-29 03:13 am (UTC)With the DCnU being so unreadable (IMO at least) I've been taking a look at Marvel and like what I see: Journey Into Mystery with Kid Loki and now Sif, Captain Marvel, Avengers, Fantastic Four, good books and yet with their flagship character they give us THIS? Why?
Also, the whole MJ saying "Face it, Tiger" line to Peter being a special thing less weighty and less "special" when Slott himself had MJ using the same exact line to the obnoxious Bobby Carr as a term of endearment post-OMD.
no subject
Date: 2012-12-29 04:37 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-12-29 04:51 am (UTC)This is so disgusting.
What is with these comic companies trying to troll readers?
no subject
Date: 2012-12-29 04:54 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-12-29 05:29 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-12-29 07:04 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-12-29 05:00 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-12-29 07:02 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-12-29 07:06 am (UTC)This is just... creepy. Like I need hand sanitizer creepy.
no subject
Date: 2012-12-29 07:58 am (UTC)So I guess the question is, what the heck are we supposed to be seeing, then? What is the mood Slott is supposed to be putting across? Are we supposed to be happy? Are we supposed to be aroused? Are we supposed to be getting the warm fuzzies? No. We're supposed to be angry and skeeved because this is creepy as fuck. It involves the violation of two people, and Slott and Wacker are perfectly aware that's where the tension in this scene comes from. At the very least, it's sexual assault, and if there's a FTB with all that such usually entails, then yes, it's rape.
This isn't people seeing what they want to see, it's them seeing what the writer and editor wanted them to see, and I think it's pretty damned disgusting that the people involved in putting this out for public consumption are at such a remove that they're willing to play rape and sexual assault for dramatic tension, but squirm away from actually naming them for what they are. As mentioned above, it's the Chameleon business all over again, with yet another round of the people who put these comics out showing their cluelessness and reluctance to accept any level of responsibility or criticism with regards to their choices. I'd say it's a shame that they're doing this while working with a character whose core is all about responsibility, but between OMD, Alpha, and the recent bouts of torture, I'm pretty sure they haven't been writing that character for a while anyway.
no subject
Date: 2012-12-29 06:43 pm (UTC)And I really don't like the implication that comics should't be held to the same standards that other mediums are when it comes to this stuff. This shit wouldn't fly on network TV and it shouldn't fly in a comic like Spider-Man.
I honestly, genuinely hope that if they go forward with an MJ/Ock romance (which I actually think is somewhat doubtful) that Marvel gets in trouble big time. Like advocacy groups and media outlets just come down on them. I'd relish seeing Marvel get called on the creepy misogyny that pervades the medium.
no subject
Date: 2012-12-29 11:32 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-12-29 11:51 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-12-29 12:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-12-29 12:43 pm (UTC)I actually went to tvtropes to find some more examples and most of the mistaken romantic identity thing involve shapeshifters or disguises and are pretty explicitly rapey.
no subject
Date: 2012-12-29 01:46 pm (UTC)Because the former is a trope, the latter is just whatever direction the writer wants to take that trope in.
no subject
Date: 2012-12-29 01:52 pm (UTC)"Is this a pretty typical comic book trope, where bad guy in good guy body kisses with good guy's girlfriend? Yes."
I can't really think of any examples like that, I guess because it's such a creepy scenario that most people avoid it.
no subject
Date: 2012-12-29 04:17 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-12-30 08:25 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-12-30 09:39 am (UTC)Second, those kinds of Silver Age stories mostly lasted for the span of a single issue, and were goofy one-shots that didn't take their premises that seriously. That's why you could get away with things like Superman forcing Jimmy Olsen to marry a gorilla; no one would do an arc about that in modern-day comics. And this Superior Spiderpus thing is going to be an extended arc with its own new title and everything.
Third, Silver Age stories could be really sexist and creepy in their own right, so that's no defense.
There have been examples of the flip side of it..
Date: 2012-12-29 04:43 pm (UTC)Afterwards Buffy felt betrayed that her boyfriend hadn't been able to see through the deception. And to be fair he did notice her acting a bit different, but seemingly just assumed she was just being in the mood to be more forward for a change.
I think that is quite realistic. Because if your boyfriend/girlfriend is acting differently, you're probably more inclined to write it off as a bizarre mood swing, rather than them being someone else, and probably likely to go along with it just hoping that they'll be more back to their usual self in the morning or whatever.
I do think though, that the longer Ock is in Pete's body, the less likely this should be to occur, given as some have pointed out above his old speech patterns are likely to show up quite often, and after a while MJ would click on to knowing that something was very wrong. But in the above example or the next issue or two, I'm sorry to say that if Ock decides to go through with it, it's likely that MJ would. Because if she's just wanting to believe that she and Pete could get back together, then she'll see what she wants to see, and so she would probably be more inclined to overlook it in the short term, but much less so the longer this goes on..
Urgh! I hate this whole topic. As the whole storyline disgusts me. (Which is annoying because up until this I was really enjoying Slott's Spidey..) But no. I can see how the worst could happen here. But that doesn't mean I want a writer creating the circumstances where it can..
no subject
Date: 2012-12-30 01:37 am (UTC)To make things all the more confusing and weird, IIRC, during the time this was happening, Brian was in the evil guy's universe, being tortured and used by a villainess as her sex slave. Yeah, it was a very rape filled story. Though, its kinda disturbing to know that its not the only time Brian as raped, and strangely, every time it happened he took it surprisingly well.
no subject
Date: 2012-12-29 05:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-12-29 06:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-12-30 10:59 pm (UTC)Basically, he'll realize he's hitting on her for Peter's benefit as part of taking over Peter's life and Peter's not there to watch.
The whole point may be that he didn't even consider physical intimacy and once he realizes it's possible, he won't do it. Heck, we already have the detail that, with May, he wanted to wait until marriage and she pressured Otto into considering sex outside of marriage.
There are a couple of ways to go from there, relationship-wise.
The controversial one would be Otto realizing that he's gay. (Which is the worst possible time, when you're in somebody else's body.)
The less controversial one being hooking up with somebody who doesn't know Peter and doesn't know who he is.
no subject
Date: 2012-12-30 01:40 am (UTC)The art is pretty bad in general, but it doubles for making things incredibly creepy.
no subject
Date: 2012-12-30 04:36 am (UTC)And what about Peter? It's his body and he's certainly not consenting, so I feel like it would also be major violation to him. Though I seriously doubt that that issue would ever be dealt with after Peter comes back, given how reluctant comics seem to deal with the idea of male rape in any serious way.
The more I think about it the more I come to realize that Marvel couldn't have Spider-Ock involved in any sort of romance without it being massively unpleasant and creepy if anyone stopped to consider it for more than a second.
no subject
Date: 2012-12-30 11:05 pm (UTC)People's knowledge of eachother is always incomplete. Posing as Peter is different than simply not admitting he's killed people. By that standard, all sex is rape unless you list dealbreakers and turnoffs first.
And what if it's someone who actively doesn't want to know who he is?
I could see a Black Cat-type fling coming out of this. Particularly if she knows he isn't Peter and doesn't want to know who he is or something like that. Maybe if she knew he was somebody else in Peter's body, for example, and that Peter wasn't coming back.
I don't think many people could be a confidante for Otto here (and he may need one) but Felicia strikes me as the one person who, while she might be initially upset, would deal with him if he starts actually reforming and would tell him she didn't want to know his past.
Of course, that would require a scenario where she realizes it's a new Spider-man and nobody else does.
no subject
Date: 2012-12-30 11:16 pm (UTC)I think Felicia could definitely work as a love interest as you outlined, but it'd still take Ock pulling off some pretty mind blowing acts of heroism beforehand for her first instinct to be hearing him out rather than running to the Avengers or something. After all Ock has been a terrible personal historically, so she'd be crazy to trust him right away.
I'm still pretty uncomfortable with the idea of Ock doing all this in Peter's body though, I'd kind of prefer it if he was just more or less asexual, as unlikely as that is.
no subject
Date: 2012-12-30 06:57 pm (UTC)Did anyone out there watch the similar storyline when it played out in fringe? The main heroine Olivia Dunham was replaced by her doppelganger from a parallel universe for spy purposes. To get what she needed she seduced Peter Bishop who had an ongoing will they wont they genuine love budding with the original Olivia. When it was revealed that the woman he had been sleeping with was fake it left all parties involved feeling violated and skeeved out. Even the doppleganger spy. It was supposed to make the audience feel weird and it did.
To be honest it doesn't surprise me that Ock would have sex on his mind. He's always been a fat nerd, and has spent the better part of the last year dying. Now he's a handsome young superhero. A better way for this scenario to play out would start off with him trying to seduce MJ, and then stop himself thinking about the unfortunate implications of rape by fraud. Like in Fringe this type of story is meant to make you feel uncomfortable. Maybe Ock well feel as bad as us the audience and say something to the effect that "Petty carnal lust is beneath The Master Planner. I am a Superior spider-man I dont need to rely on this fraud." As best as i can remember Ock's never been a lecherous old man. We've seen 100 "Villain in the heroes place causes havok" stories. I think the interesting thing with the Spidey-Ock story would be seeing if being a hero could semi redeem Doc Ock. Maybe realizing how much of a ass he's being would start Ock down a better path.
no subject
Date: 2012-12-31 12:52 am (UTC)