The colorist for BoP #2 posted this on her DeviantArt page, stating "This is a treat for you guys, not the final published page, and I bet some of you will be able to pick out why....."
And here's how the panel looked like in the issue.
Well, and because the artists and writers might be as lonely as they think the fans are.
Aaron "The Mad Whitaker" Bourque; or at the least, the artists like to draw sexy women because the artist likes sexy women. There are just so many places to find that in the real world and the internets, we don't really NEED it in comics.
It shouldn't be, that's true, but whenever the objectification is complained about, that is exactly the response from editorial. Those making the decisions about the content think they are providing what the fans want by publishing such content. Hence the term 'fanservice'.
I'm truly surprised that any of this is news to anybody and in any case, isn't the point I was trying to make with my comments which are reproduced below:
I have problems with the notion that 1) female characters cannot be taken seriously because they are drawn in sexually-objectifying uniforms. That edges very close to slut-shaming. 2) That female fans would have a more difficult time ignoring the fanservice than male fans. It implies that men don't buy comics featuring female characters for any other reason than to jack off to the pictures.
Also, if fans of any (or no) gender decide not to buy comics featuring female characters, TPTB will never assume it's because people don't like the sexual objectification of the characters. They will always assume it's because no one wants to read a comic that stars female characters.
Aaron "The Mad Whitaker" Bourque; but if there were ever pitched a series staring a female character in completely non-objectifying uniform, Dust from the X-Men, say, there'd still be plenty of people who would gravitate toward it in a fanservice way, thinking the lack of skin or whatever would be hot or something. Women just can't seem to win in comics.
Founded by girl geeks and members of the slash fandom, scans_daily strives to provide an atmosphere which is LGBTQ-friendly, anti-racist, anti-ableist, woman-friendly and otherwise discrimination and harassment free.
Bottom line: If slash, feminism or anti-oppressive practice makes you react negatively, scans_daily is probably not for you.
no subject
Date: 2010-06-18 06:36 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-06-18 06:38 pm (UTC)Aaron "The Mad Whitaker" Bourque; or at the least, the artists like to draw sexy women because the artist likes sexy women. There are just so many places to find that in the real world and the internets, we don't really NEED it in comics.
no subject
Date: 2010-06-19 01:48 am (UTC)I'm truly surprised that any of this is news to anybody and in any case, isn't the point I was trying to make with my comments which are reproduced below:
I have problems with the notion that 1) female characters cannot be taken seriously because they are drawn in sexually-objectifying uniforms. That edges very close to slut-shaming.
2) That female fans would have a more difficult time ignoring the fanservice than male fans. It implies that men don't buy comics featuring female characters for any other reason than to jack off to the pictures.
Also, if fans of any (or no) gender decide not to buy comics featuring female characters, TPTB will never assume it's because people don't like the sexual objectification of the characters. They will always assume it's because no one wants to read a comic that stars female characters.
no subject
Date: 2010-06-19 02:39 pm (UTC)Aaron "The Mad Whitaker" Bourque; but if there were ever pitched a series staring a female character in completely non-objectifying uniform, Dust from the X-Men, say, there'd still be plenty of people who would gravitate toward it in a fanservice way, thinking the lack of skin or whatever would be hot or something. Women just can't seem to win in comics.