Why do comic fans get stereotyped so much?
Nov. 8th, 2010 07:55 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
A friend linked me to this yesterday, and I just had to share. Written and drawn by some guy who works in a comic book shop, Our Valued Customers is a webstrip in which he quotes actual things he's heard his customers say.

Some other stand-outs beneath the cut...
















Some other stand-outs beneath the cut...















no subject
Date: 2010-11-09 04:10 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-09 04:23 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-10 01:14 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-09 04:28 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-09 06:02 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-09 06:20 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-09 09:28 am (UTC)I can only assume you're talking about the Geoff Johns who existed before Superboy Prime retcon-punched him out of continuity to be replaced with his shouty, badly characterized lookalike.
no subject
Date: 2010-11-09 04:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-09 09:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-09 06:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-09 04:32 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-09 04:41 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-09 04:43 am (UTC)And for that, I'm grateful, because I don't doubt the stupidity of the common idiot.
no subject
Date: 2010-11-09 06:20 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-09 04:55 am (UTC)...
I mean...fuck.
no subject
Date: 2010-11-09 05:04 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-09 05:06 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-09 07:39 am (UTC)It's like saying that Rasputin's first name was Gregory.
no subject
Date: 2010-11-09 05:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-10 10:48 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-10 06:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-09 08:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-09 05:07 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-09 08:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-09 05:27 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-09 05:44 am (UTC)Still, sometimes it's fun to have conversations with others and just geek out.. but there are times where you will hear some really weird shit being said.
Also.. Star Wars... way better than Star Trek.
Fans: "Oooooo.."
Star Trek Fan: "No he didn't.."
SW Fan: "Hahaha, oh yes. Yes he did. What are you gonna do about it?"
ST Fan: "Well..at least we don't have Jar-Jar!!"
SW Fan: "...Low blow dude..low blow. At least our hero didn't have a bridge dropped on him!"
ST Fan: "Now why do you have to go there huh?"
ST Fan 2: *speaks Klingon*
SW Fan: "Hey! You! Shut up! Seriously, how stupid is that? You guys actually adopted the language from a t.v. show!"
ST Fan: "As opposed to all of you speaking Wookie?!"
SW Fan: "Hey! Wookies make great travelling companions and will own Klingon ass any day of the week! You guys don't even have Jedi! They'll block your little phasers with their lightsabers!"
ST Fan: "Ugh! I get so fucking tired of hearing about Jedi and this Force shit! You know what? It's go time!"
SW Fan: "Bring it!!"
Annnd a fight breaks out... which let's be honest who wouldn't want to see geek warfare? lol
no subject
Date: 2010-11-09 07:27 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-09 01:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-09 07:09 pm (UTC)Would I be awful to admit...
Date: 2010-11-09 03:40 pm (UTC)I was defending Angel, she was defending Spike. And though it wasn't heated or violent, I had to admit it was entertaining to argue and debate over it and refer to past episodes of the TV show as evidence.
Re: Would I be awful to admit...
Date: 2010-11-09 08:39 pm (UTC)Re: Would I be awful to admit...
Date: 2010-11-10 04:07 pm (UTC)I repeat: when it's not violent or heated, it's actually fun bouncing back and forth ideas and viewpoints and trying to debate our favorite shows and comics.
no subject
Date: 2010-11-09 04:40 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-09 08:40 pm (UTC)Yeeeesssss...
no subject
Date: 2010-11-09 07:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-09 05:45 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-09 06:02 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-09 10:47 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-09 10:56 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-09 10:49 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-09 10:58 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-10 06:14 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-10 08:00 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-09 11:04 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-10 12:14 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-10 12:46 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-10 12:52 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-10 01:22 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-10 02:22 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-10 02:28 am (UTC)OTP diet!
Date: 2010-11-11 02:50 am (UTC)Re: OTP diet!
Date: 2010-11-11 02:52 am (UTC)Re: OTP diet!
Re: OTP diet!
Date: 2010-11-12 03:19 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-09 03:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-09 08:41 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-09 11:25 am (UTC)Well, one assumes it's not, like, friends talking, or a discussion of fic, or the like.
I imagine it was just somebody noticing someone in a Blue Sun shirt, or buying a Kaylee action figure (are there Firefly action figures? I didn't pay attention), or a copy of Serenity, and popping out 'oh, by the way, I write smutfic for that show!'
no subject
Date: 2010-11-09 11:26 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-09 06:18 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-09 08:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-09 06:33 am (UTC)The absolute worst part of all this? I'm now suffering through a mental debate of Danger Room Vs. Holodeck. At this point, I lean toward Danger Room.
no subject
Date: 2010-11-09 03:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-09 06:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-09 07:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-09 09:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-10 12:37 am (UTC)Heh, how's that for a geek argument?
no subject
Date: 2010-11-10 08:56 am (UTC)Truthfully, outside of the Danger Room's purpose being more dangerously educational, I don't see a lot of differences. I think the only reason I lean toward Danger Room is that it can make stuff you can leave with and that also has lasting physical effects on people. If it can make aerosol gas to knock Rogue out and exploding heat-seeking missiles, it stands to reason that it could probably make me a fake bar where I could get a decent beer, a t-shirt and maybe even an iPod (assuming nobody is programming it to murder me at the time).
no subject
Date: 2010-11-09 07:16 am (UTC)I wish I could move back to where I did my postgrad, because the local comic book guy there is ace.
no subject
Date: 2010-11-09 07:40 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-09 10:58 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-09 01:24 pm (UTC)That's nasty! Glad you said "used to", geez.
no subject
Date: 2010-11-09 08:46 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-09 08:43 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-09 09:25 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-09 10:29 am (UTC)And I can't help but find the Catwoman one rather sweet. When the comic book industry sports gems such as "yeah, sure, cripple the bitch" (editor's reply to Alan Moore's request to use Batgirl in The Killing Joke) and "they needed a rape. Because there’s nothing quite so badass as rape, lets face it" (justification for the fridging of Sue Dibny), I actually find it a relief that a fanboy was so concerned for Selina's well-being. So what if she is a fictional character? If a fictional work can't get you emotionally invested in its characters, that means the work in question sucks.
no subject
Date: 2010-11-09 01:25 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-09 01:39 pm (UTC)But, re-reading it, it does sounds like it can also mean "the guys are going to molest her, LOL!" Ok, yeah, if that's what he meant, that's creepy as fuck >_>
For the sake of what little faith in humanity I have left, I choose to believe that my original interpretation was the correct one.
no subject
Date: 2010-11-09 01:41 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-09 08:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-10 05:31 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-10 09:09 am (UTC)Frankly, I find your comment creepy and sexist, as it implies that a woman should never freely express her sexuality around men because that would necessarily reduce her to a sex slave.
no subject
Date: 2010-11-10 02:32 pm (UTC)Buying a female character-figure because they are a neat character and then thinking "o hey, and they can DO IT with my other figures! lucky!"? Sure, unsketchy. Buying a representation of an established character just to be a sex decoration for already owned dude-toys.. sketchy.
no subject
Date: 2010-11-10 10:50 pm (UTC)Of course, I've been wrong plenty of times before, and I stubbornly keep expecting people to be good and sane when I really should know better, so there is that...
no subject
Date: 2010-11-09 01:30 pm (UTC)Maybe it would seem silly to a non-comic book fan for someone to be concerned about the well-being of a fictional character, but I totally get it
no subject
Date: 2010-11-11 07:49 pm (UTC)(Or, answer in context: eh, it's Selina, she'll be fine.)
no subject
Date: 2010-11-09 10:44 am (UTC)I don't know how much of it is confirmation bias, and I tend to see it way more on message boards than in the store I work at, but oh my god the negativity. And weird, unfounded opinions and dislike! My God, why the hell are you guys having so much fun in NOT having fun!?!?!? At least laugh about it and don't take it seriously!
Also I just really hate A-lister only fans omg.
no subject
Date: 2010-11-09 10:48 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-09 11:07 am (UTC)Translation, please?
no subject
Date: 2010-11-09 11:09 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-09 11:16 am (UTC)*suddenly THINKS about that image*
*gets mildly disturbed*
*filed line away to use when the opportunity arises*
>_>
no subject
Date: 2010-11-09 09:14 pm (UTC)After all if people didn't incessantly trash other people for the vile act of having negative opinions of comic books, you wouldn't know that those people were better than all those negative fans they're trashing.
no subject
Date: 2010-11-10 01:01 am (UTC)here let me get my hankie out :)
no subject
Date: 2010-11-10 02:09 am (UTC)Nah you did a pretty good job phrasing your passive-aggressive swipe at a broad group of people well enough that any attempt to pin down specifically who you're shitting on is easily deniable on your part, you should be proud.
no subject
Date: 2010-11-10 03:00 am (UTC)Lmao GURL. Hmm, broad swipe? Let's see, I specifically name:
People who are stubbornly ONLY fans of A-listers and will only give A-list characters a chance.
People who are miserably and overly negative (as opposed to people who don't like something, different. Very.)
People who throw out phrases at characters like a net to flatten and simplify without substantial evidence to back it up or address anything contrary suggested at them.
Seriously. I named the phrases, and said it's annoying when people don't really give much behind their opinion on that. I have voiced displeasure at various story turns, treatments of a character, and writing decisions before. There is nothing wrong with not liking something.
But have a little perspective and distance. These are comics. This is a genre. This is an art form, learn to divorce personal taste and preferences with the actual view of composition and structure. Many people don't. This isn't a public sphere where people are speaking of social injustices and those who talk against the status quo or The Man are oppressed and silenced in a similar way. This is about cape comics and superheroes and marketing gimmicks and the whole shebang. There are public spaces (the comic shop I work at) where it is entirely inappropriate to be voicing rage over how crappy (and it is, imo) Brightest Day is when young kids are thumbing through it and having fun. It's called tact, and the rhetoric is just memetic and a bore. It's too much to ask for actual reasonable dialog about this stuff, though, I guess, and about voicing any sort of displeasure.
Now, it being broad, of course you had to project your oppressed fan insecurities. I admit it, I'm a total meanie jerkpants who hates everyone that doesn't like Geoff Johns, Grant Morrison, Bendis, and all of our comic overlords. I believe you all should shut up and be pleased with whatever comes out.
I have a more optimistic view on life. For example. one of my favourite characters is Really Really Defensive Fan. I think they've been written terribly lately, though, and I voice my criticism often, but I have faith that they will be written justly :') according to my vision. You are SO shat on for disliking Geoff Johns and all other shitty terrible bad comics put out today!! My god, I just am totally crapping all over, what happened to my bowels?
You know, I always wondered the identity of RRDF... I mean, I noticed you're always taking bathroom breaks and stuff when they're around but...nah. You wear glasses and they don't. Couldn't be.
no subject
Date: 2010-11-09 11:08 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-09 11:14 am (UTC)re: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V4o3yLHCqaI
no subject
Date: 2010-11-09 11:15 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-09 11:19 am (UTC)1. I'd forgotten that clip and the fact that it works so god damn well to this day is magical.
2. If yoou actually use the word "Giggity" when you are aroused be something then I'm pretty sure you've committed a mortal sin and you will be sent to the newly constructed 10th circle of hell.
3. Has a guy, after finding out you're not interested in them from a sexuality standpoint, ever gotten angry at you? I'm sure hat has to end reeeeaaally badly for the whole store.
no subject
Date: 2010-11-09 11:26 am (UTC)2. I know. I think he just is trying to be funny, but it comes off as so obnoxious. I was recommending Life with Archie to somebody and he popped in, and I didn't even see him enter the story, and made the most generic threesome joke ever. I just think it is the saddest thing ever that he exists.
3. I have two coworkers by my side almost always who are incredibly thoughtful and really good at picking up on my discomfort :) and steering away guys who are harassing me. I can stand up for myself, but it actually really helps me out, when they take the burden off of me since I'll just be seen as a bitch or a stick in the mud or whatever. I've had that happen at a lot of other jobs, but never at this job. People have never accused me of leading them on or anything, but I have had the generic "Get your mind out of the gutter, I just wanted to be friends" comments after I refuse to give my number for like the tenth time.
Overall I get slight discomfort from some advances, but most are annoying in their frequency/persistence, but less offensive than what I've experience, interestingly enough, than working in let's say the food industry or retail.
no subject
Date: 2010-11-09 08:43 pm (UTC)"Yeah, green, red, but we're all pink on the inside huh ~suggestive eyebrow waggle~"
"...Funny. Anyway Archie was-"
"Yeah, Betty, Veronica, why do you gotta choose between em ~crotch grab~"
"Wow, thanks for that, you able to find it alright in there? Want me to get Steve to find it for you?"
"Maybe you can find it ~eye waggle~"
"Really? That-that's your pick up line. You want me to find your dick? Like, it's so small you lost it? Should I send a fucking search party out to find your schlong? Can you just leave already?"
"But-"
"No. Just fucking go. I don't need your money, it ain't worth hearing you joke like Dane Cook's secret half brother he has locked in his basement and you smell like Satan's asscrack. So fucking go"
"Frigid bitch..."
"Yeah, I know, I'm so frigid taht I didn't immediatly blow you after you used pick up lines from a dating simulator. They usually work on the maids with huge tits and glasses who call you Onee-chan but not so much in the real world."
no subject
Date: 2010-11-09 11:13 am (UTC)One of my buddies is sort of like this - and it's bizarrely recently...while he supported Manhunter and Blue Beetle when they were coming out, anything headlining a b-(or c-)lister, or breaking from the format (Superhero books only - he's good with non-Superhero books, but superbooks which break away, not so much), etc...
I'll be geeking out over Great Ten, or Knight and Squire (which he admits to liking, but...see below), or the Mighty Crusaders, whatever, and conversation will grind to a halt when his reply is 'won't sell'/'not selling'. (I've not even bothered trying to discuss the First Wave universe with him, although the main book and Doc Savage have both been awesome, and The Spirit passable.)
It's frustrating.
no subject
Date: 2010-11-09 11:21 am (UTC)It reminds me of like, I don't know, a Tea Partier. I WANT MY COUNTRY/REAL AVENGERS/REAL JLA BACK!!!
I mean if the writing is bad, I understand, but godddd the vehemence aimed at certain characters advancing or trying to break the glass ceiling is just wow
no subject
Date: 2010-11-09 11:51 am (UTC)I'm of the mind of enjoying myself while the going is good, even if the journey will eventually head over a cliff. But people are different, I guess.
no subject
Date: 2010-11-09 12:09 pm (UTC)It's a little bit annoying when it's simply 'that book's getting cancelled, why bother' (because it's awesome, that's why!), but it's really annoying when it's a preemptive dismissal - Some examples from recent attempts at conversations: 'A Knight and Squire - or better yet, DCU London - ongoing would be awesome.' 'Eh, wouldn't sell.'; 'I'm really looking forward to Mighty Crusaders.' 'They're not selling, it won't sell.'
no subject
Date: 2010-11-10 10:58 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-09 10:46 am (UTC)Who fucking says that? Who? For fucks sakes.
no subject
Date: 2010-11-09 11:00 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-09 11:30 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-09 01:10 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-09 02:25 pm (UTC)Err... self preservation instinct aside, that is.
no subject
Date: 2010-11-09 03:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-09 07:10 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-09 09:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-09 03:34 pm (UTC)As it turns out, none of them were in a comic store, or by anyone who I suspect would read a comic if they were stuck in a waiting room for hours and it was the only thing to do other than stare blankly at a wall.
no subject
Date: 2010-11-09 06:43 pm (UTC)But yeah, who says that in a frikkin' comic shop? What was he looking for, Spire's Archie series and Jack Chick tracts?
no subject
Date: 2010-11-09 06:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-09 08:33 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-09 09:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-09 09:01 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-10 12:36 am (UTC)There's a case to be made for it being exactly that.
no subject
Date: 2010-11-11 02:46 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-10 12:13 am (UTC)There's a song about it.
no subject
Date: 2010-11-10 07:36 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-10 10:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-09 11:26 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-09 11:30 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-09 11:40 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-09 12:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-09 01:22 pm (UTC)And I think there might be quite a number of Native American tribes who would demur with your last point, up to a point of course.
no subject
Date: 2010-11-09 01:34 pm (UTC)And yes, fair point, but I would call the US treatment of Native Americans of the period more 'systematic oppression' than 'systematic slaughter'. It included a good deal of slaughter in the bargain, of course, but there was a hell of a lot more cooperation between Native Americans and Wild Westerners than there was between Jews/minorities/etc. and Nazis.
no subject
Date: 2010-11-09 01:38 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-09 03:43 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-09 07:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-09 09:30 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-10 12:43 am (UTC):)
no subject
Date: 2010-11-09 05:53 pm (UTC)A couple things: 1) The US doesn't have (for want of a better phrase) many physical scars from WWII-- our country never got bombed so there aren't areas where people in living memory can tell you how they had to rebuild the entire block; 2) American media really, really loves WWII (both in movies and games), perhaps because it was our last "good war" (without all the moral ambiguity and sense that 'we lost' of Vietnam).
no subject
Date: 2010-11-10 12:22 am (UTC)And I also think it's an upsetting lack of respect about tragedy. Not all movies/books are like that, obviously, but sometimes I wish the Shoah was a little more taboo a setting in fiction.
no subject
Date: 2010-11-09 08:23 pm (UTC)A goodly number of Native American peoples would beg to differ.
no subject
Date: 2010-11-09 10:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-09 03:25 pm (UTC)The Nazis are Cats, the Jews are Mice, so this way you actually care about who wins (between cats and mice).
Sort of playing on a fairly commonly expressed sentiment that funny animal books are pointless, you can't get invested in the struggles of cats and mice. Then I read it again and realized it was probably meant:
The Nazis are Cats, the Jews are Mice, so this way you actually care about who wins (between Nazis and Jews).
Which is obviously horrific.
Then it occured to me that although these may be "actual conversations", every conversation the creator relays is reinterpretted in his own head first. I mean, half the time when I repeat what somebody said ONLINE, with the text right above me, I quote it wrong and have to double check. Unless he was actually video/audio recording his customers, or has a photographic memory, it's always possible something was misheard. It could very well be that the person meant the first one and his words actually reflect that.
I hope that's the case in at least some of them, but of course pretty horrifying people aren't uncommon.
Powergirl's reaction says it all..
Date: 2010-11-09 11:35 am (UTC)I just took a look at that blog. Some things were funny, some were just.. really out there and downright fucked up. Some of the things said, you can usually find in an internet forum, so it amazed me that they were said out loud like that. I can't help but think of the Clerk's tagline when I first saw the trailer, "We may serve you, but we don't have to like you." I think it was said a bit different but the meaning was the same. I get that impression reading that blog.
no subject
Date: 2010-11-09 11:43 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-09 11:58 am (UTC)I remember you bringing up those who like only A-Listers. You know what's funny is this same friend, there are plenty times when he doesn't care about b-listers and lower, but all it takes is seeing them in a video game, movie, t.v. show, etc for him to even build an interest when I already told him of said characters previously.
One more thing I gotta bring up... show recommendations.. he often asks me what shows should he watch. I'm going to bring up a recent debate we had. I recommended Walking Dead. He has no interest and then when I say at least check it out, trust he's been into zombie stuff before, we get into a debate about how much he tried to get me into Naruto and don't give that a chance. Now here's the ridiculousness of his argument... More than once, I told him... I had NO interest in Naruto. Before he even repeatedly reccomended it.. I tell him... checked it out... not interested. Eventually I do at least give it a second chance and while I don't think it's as bad as I thought... I tell him... it's at the VERY bottom of my list of interests... and he still argues saying I never gave the show a chance when I, in fact, have... more than once.. yet he literally doesn't give a show a chance at all unless later on he comes across it by accident or saw it in another form of media when I recommended it to begin with.
no subject
Date: 2010-11-09 04:20 pm (UTC)