FF 02: Sneak wordless preview
Mar. 29th, 2011 01:52 pmSo if you saw the previous post with FF01 you'll know the new team isn't getting just one new member but two three plus the kids. I liked this idea but there was something that bugged me.
Given the events of the Unthinkable story arc, why is this even being considered without it being mentioned?


It would seem I'm not the only one. Go Ben! Not to Reed bash but why the hell are you looking so shocked considering what Doom did to Franklin and rest of you?
From Marvel's site.
First try at the new site, hope I got all the HTML right.
Given the events of the Unthinkable story arc, why is this even being considered without it being mentioned?
It would seem I'm not the only one. Go Ben! Not to Reed bash but why the hell are you looking so shocked considering what Doom did to Franklin and rest of you?
From Marvel's site.
First try at the new site, hope I got all the HTML right.
no subject
Date: 2011-03-29 09:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-03-29 09:17 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-03-29 09:47 pm (UTC)Not only to 1 up reed, but to build on what the FF already did for him. Plus it seems it would be just the right amount of Dickery that would work well if Ben was running at you in gonna cream you mode.
Also, what happened with Doom War, you'd think Victor would be on a no fly list and not welcome in the US. Even as a monarch of another country, hostile countries can be told their Diplomatic clemency has been taken... can't they?
no subject
Date: 2011-03-30 11:00 am (UTC)"Beskirted serving wench! Doom demands more peanuts! And leave the entire can of ginger ale this time!"
no subject
Date: 2011-03-29 09:35 pm (UTC)Trapped. Your. Son. In. Hell. React better, Reed.
no subject
Date: 2011-03-29 09:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-03-30 03:03 am (UTC)Apparently Unthinkable is just going to go the way of all those stories that are never mentioned again. It probably simply never happened to the current writers.
no subject
Date: 2011-03-30 08:52 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-03-30 04:00 pm (UTC)http://scans-daily.dreamwidth.org/2358200.html
(Sorry about the non-link. Guess I ought to get round to setting up a proper Dreamwidth account if I'm going to keep commenting here...)
no subject
Date: 2011-03-29 11:00 pm (UTC)Ben's response
Date: 2011-03-29 09:40 pm (UTC)Ben Grimm...my childhood hero since 1967.
Re: Ben's response
Date: 2011-03-29 09:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-03-29 09:48 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-03-29 09:49 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-03-29 10:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-03-29 10:07 pm (UTC)I've seen a lot of people say that and I really don't understand the hate. I'm not a huge Fantastic Four follower, which may be why I liked it, but why do you think it was a really shitty arc?
no subject
Date: 2011-03-29 10:21 pm (UTC)And not the Jigsaw with the twisted sense of fair play from the first movies but the sadistic Joker-as-death-god Jigsaw from the latter ones.
Not to mention Doom's plans always had some sort of endgame outside of "make my enemies suffer." Basically setting the whole thing up just to torture the FF (let alone what he did to two innocent children) rubbed a lot of people the wrong way.
Granted, that Doom crossed the line and then hit Turbo Boost was probably the point. But you really can't take an iconic character like Doom and change his style and MO that drastically and expect it to stick. (See also: Electric Superman).
But really, even if you consign Unthinkable to discontinuity, there's still Doomwar. Do they really think they can keep Doom a secret from the large number of powerful entities that would take the Baxter Building apart to get at Doom (read: The Asgardians)?
no subject
Date: 2011-03-30 12:28 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-03-30 03:17 am (UTC)Also, your icon is made of win. :)
no subject
Date: 2011-03-30 08:37 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-03-30 09:47 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-03-29 09:57 pm (UTC)There's Uncle Doom, Spider-man and grandpa Richards in the First Family alone.
no subject
Date: 2011-03-29 09:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-03-29 10:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-03-29 10:22 pm (UTC)The bad news is that instead of making me pick up their current stuff or express any interest whatsoever in their recent stories, all it did was make me remember that "hey, these guys were the most epic badass little family once!" and inspire me to start re-reading loads of '80s stuff.
Really, I'm usually good about meshing old-school stuff with newer stuff, but with the FF, the tone shift between them *still* jars me no matter how many times I contrast them.
no subject
Date: 2011-03-29 10:33 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-03-29 11:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-03-30 12:01 am (UTC)I actually always have problems when I criticize Unthinkable, because I don't dislike it because I think "Doom would never stoop that low" (his entire life revolves around one-upping some inferior dolt who bruised his ego by being smarter than him. He IS plenty petty enough), but the whole plan just wasn't...Doomy. Are there adjectives other than "Doomy" to describe the Doomishness of Doom's evil plans? There's more to Doom's character than evil, hammy, manipulative, and arrogant. He has a whole subtly characterized and quite specific schtick that always involves grandiose consequences, even if his main goal is "make Richards suffer".
no subject
Date: 2011-03-30 12:07 am (UTC)My personal mental retcon is that Doom made his initial bargain to work with the Hazareth earlier on, in return for saving baby Valeria when she should have died (not so much out of altruism as to stick it to Reed, natch) and the rest was a mix of him tricking the Hazareth into believing he's going along and leaving it up to the F4 to extricate themselves if they could. Retcon out the godawful skinning thing as Doom pulling a con game on the demons and chalk the rest up to Doom considering that he's serving the greater good and it's all Reed's own fault if he's too incompetent to stop Doom's actions... works well enough for me to live with.
no subject
Date: 2011-03-30 03:34 am (UTC)Always works.
no subject
Date: 2011-03-30 05:16 am (UTC)All leading to the classic sci-fi cliche when Doom finds out, and he logically and methodically berates the Doombot for its failures, ending with Victor talking his Doombot to death . . . yessssss.
no subject
Date: 2011-03-30 10:07 am (UTC)And really, it actually makes more sense to call Doombot here than a lot of places canon played that card. After all, we have direct precedent for Doombots not understanding the moral difference between implanting Doom's memories into a robot/clone vs. implanting them into a small boy he'd declared his heir. (I wish Byrne could have had the chance to go with his original intention of Doctor Doom completely losing it when he came back and found what the bots had done. But hey, Hickman's brought back Kristoff, so maybe there's hope for that storyline too.)
...Trusting the current writer to do awesome things with his material. This is such a novel sensation. Who can I petition to keep Hickman on this book forever?
no subject
Date: 2011-03-30 12:04 am (UTC)Note to Reed
Date: 2011-03-30 02:22 am (UTC)So..Correct me if I'm wrong but..
Date: 2011-03-30 12:48 pm (UTC)Not that I mind, (in fact I wish they'd do that with some of his other stories too!)
I'm just not quite sure whether I'm annoyed that Marvel don't even bother to come up with some 'no prize' style explanation for their screw ups these days, or whether I'm just relieved that they are completely sweeping it under the rug, never to be mentioned again.
Y'know, For all the criticism he gets, at least Dan Slott tried to come up with an explanation for why Marvel's continuity sucks these days. But I'm surprised other writers don't even bother to do something similar anymore.
Re: So..Correct me if I'm wrong but..
Date: 2011-03-30 02:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-03-30 08:30 pm (UTC)