It's a preview on multiple levels.
May. 11th, 2011 05:06 pmSo now that John Steele's been reintroduced and the Shadow Council's been established as a threat, Brubaker's off Secret Avengers.
Nick Spencer's on for four issues, taking the cast through Fear Itself, and then Warren Ellis's coming in for a very, ah.. spiritually successive six.
Perhaps the latter's why last month's Point One issue wove semi-realistic espionage dynamics together with universe-specific concepts, featured competent protagonists working under a very specific methodology, and was self-contained overall.
The latter was the beginning, the former was the end; one set up the story's conflict, the other provided a sort of resolution to it.
Considering the first's scope, Negative's presence in the second was interesting; if nothing else, it speaks to how relatively successful he is as a new villain, turning up in books entirely unrelated to him (To Serve And Protect's Anole/Rockslide story, One Month 2 Live) in his function as Chinatown mobster.
It's in that capacity Spencer'll be writing him during the Cloak and Dagger mini, so I thought this also a preview of that.
If it's an accurate enough one, then, he'll definitely be letting a bit more of that Martin Li affability bleed through..

(Those are the most casual his Inner Demons've been yet.. the most eyehole-y, too.)
..tempered with a bit of his darker side, of course.

(I take it he didn't spring for the flamethrowers?)
Perhaps given to a little less mercy..

..but definitely to a quick hand.
(What, no shadowy charge-up of the blade?)
Yes, he should definitely be a fun Cloak and Dagger foe, combining some of Spencer's favored traits in the writing of main villains as he does: urbane subtlety, wearing suits, and ruthlessness.
(The would-be Cap was also pretty good, though definitely more misguided idiot. Loved the panel that followed his "YOU'RE A CORRUPT SUPERCOP, CAPTAIN AMERICA!" rant..)
Nick Spencer's on for four issues, taking the cast through Fear Itself, and then Warren Ellis's coming in for a very, ah.. spiritually successive six.
Perhaps the latter's why last month's Point One issue wove semi-realistic espionage dynamics together with universe-specific concepts, featured competent protagonists working under a very specific methodology, and was self-contained overall.
The latter was the beginning, the former was the end; one set up the story's conflict, the other provided a sort of resolution to it.
Considering the first's scope, Negative's presence in the second was interesting; if nothing else, it speaks to how relatively successful he is as a new villain, turning up in books entirely unrelated to him (To Serve And Protect's Anole/Rockslide story, One Month 2 Live) in his function as Chinatown mobster.
It's in that capacity Spencer'll be writing him during the Cloak and Dagger mini, so I thought this also a preview of that.
If it's an accurate enough one, then, he'll definitely be letting a bit more of that Martin Li affability bleed through..

(Those are the most casual his Inner Demons've been yet.. the most eyehole-y, too.)
..tempered with a bit of his darker side, of course.

(I take it he didn't spring for the flamethrowers?)
Perhaps given to a little less mercy..

..but definitely to a quick hand.
(What, no shadowy charge-up of the blade?)
Yes, he should definitely be a fun Cloak and Dagger foe, combining some of Spencer's favored traits in the writing of main villains as he does: urbane subtlety, wearing suits, and ruthlessness.
(The would-be Cap was also pretty good, though definitely more misguided idiot. Loved the panel that followed his "YOU'RE A CORRUPT SUPERCOP, CAPTAIN AMERICA!" rant..)
no subject
Date: 2011-05-11 10:49 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-05-12 12:56 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-05-12 01:27 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-05-12 02:18 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-05-12 03:04 am (UTC)Didn't they go to 1907?
Date: 2011-05-12 10:27 am (UTC)Re: Didn't they go to 1907?
Date: 2011-05-12 02:53 pm (UTC)Unless I'm severely mistaken they kissed before Moore's run even back in Vaugn's run and defidently in Whendon's run. My biggest problem with Moore's run wasn't his fault but he had no idea what to do with Klara so she was just kind of there.
My Immonen's run was not only did it not end it didn't end on a cliff hanger that heavily resembled the Cliff hanger of the Teen Titans cartoon.
Re: Didn't they go to 1907?
Date: 2011-05-12 07:01 pm (UTC)That's exactly what I'm talking about in the Immonen run, it ended on a cliffhanger because Marvel canceled the book before she even got to finish her first story. It never even had a chance.
no subject
Date: 2011-05-12 04:40 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-05-12 04:41 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-05-12 06:01 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-05-12 10:09 am (UTC)That' pretty much standard procedure.
no subject
Date: 2011-05-12 04:42 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-05-12 10:32 am (UTC)They do look more like the Fistigons, and in Whedon's run Chase retrieved new versions of the gauntlets which could generate electricity and shoot rockets, in addition to being flame throwers.
no subject
Date: 2011-05-12 12:12 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-05-13 10:23 am (UTC)..and why is he popping up everywhere lately??