![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)




And....that was rather predictable.
Also, considering how the rest of the book played out, I have to ask...who at DC has woman issues to the extent of needing to commit all kinds of acts of violence against female characters, including established ones like Harley Quinn (and Lois Lane and the rest of the Amazons on Earth-2 for that matter)? Jesus fucking Christ man, you need therapy whoever you are.
Between this issue and the last I'm glad this isn't a regular title on my pull list.
no subject
Date: 2012-03-15 05:08 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-03-15 05:13 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-03-15 05:16 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-03-15 05:18 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-03-15 07:59 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-03-15 12:49 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-03-15 10:00 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-03-16 12:02 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-03-16 12:21 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-03-16 12:36 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-03-15 06:02 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-03-15 08:37 am (UTC)And we all know how magic doesn't need any more explanation..
no subject
Date: 2012-03-15 03:39 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-03-15 10:02 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-03-15 06:05 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-03-15 06:22 pm (UTC)I preferred the original Harley's pancake makeup to this version. It seems more appropriate to the character if she changes herself for her man, rather than Joker doing it to/for her. I think that I feel this way because I was introduced to Harley via the "Birds of Prey" TV series and B:TAS.
It's my headcanon that Joker finds Harley rather annoying, like a wannabe.
no subject
Date: 2012-03-15 10:05 pm (UTC)I can see that--but I can also see that it seems like DC's pushing her from being Joker's henchwench to being a female Joker, so giving her the permawhite treatment makes sense. With what you said in mind, it might have made for something even more twisted if she dived into that chemical bath herself.
no subject
Date: 2012-03-15 10:17 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-03-15 06:46 am (UTC)I know there are rules and laws regarding that sort of thing. I just find it strange how in comics, practically everything else can be shown but the moment a nipple is involved it must be covered up.
Just IMO.
Also disappointed by the lack of creativity changing Harley's origin. This origin is essentially the same so why did the DC multiverse have to implode to make stories like this possible?
Here's an idea, keep Harley's old origin, build up her character again in this new continuity. Show how her insanity is making her do terrible things but she still retains some morality and doubt about helping the Joker.
Then, have her take an acid bath herself, of her own free will. To show her devotion to the Joker and to indicate that her psychosis has reached its apex and her sanity is truly lost.
That to me would be much more poignant and meaningful. Again, just IMO
no subject
Date: 2012-03-15 08:38 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-03-15 12:50 pm (UTC)That's how I thought it was going to play out actually.
no subject
Date: 2012-03-15 07:36 am (UTC)Used to be that the Pit was Ra's and Ra's alone, with Batman using it once and nearly dying in the process. Nowadays he might as well open a health spa there.
The Joker surviving the acid dip SHOULD be a complete fluke, a one in a billion chance. Not something that COULD work a second time.
no subject
Date: 2012-03-15 07:56 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-03-15 08:40 am (UTC)So she can still look sexy while kissing the joker or posing around in those last panels, not looking like someone totally disfigured by chemical products.
*rolls eyes*
no subject
Date: 2012-03-15 08:52 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-03-15 09:00 am (UTC)But perhaps that is another New 52 retcon :P
no subject
Date: 2012-03-15 09:13 am (UTC)I tried GISing Joker to check, but I just got a load of Heath Ledger pictures, haha.
no subject
Date: 2012-03-15 11:23 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-03-15 04:30 pm (UTC)I also thought Joker Venom was supposed to be the same stuff, which means he should be Jokerizing people, not killing them
no subject
Date: 2012-03-15 11:06 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-03-15 11:53 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-03-15 10:13 pm (UTC)Modifying a designer toxin specifically designed to create the white skin and grin is one thing, random waste acids is quite another IMHO.
no subject
Date: 2012-03-15 04:17 pm (UTC)It also means Joker threw her in there assuming she'd die from it. Which I like.
no subject
Date: 2012-03-15 10:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-03-15 10:42 am (UTC)Also...as per usual - the art. Good lord, what...why...Joker looks like his face is melting and/or he's going to eat Harley's head in that one panel. Gah.
no subject
Date: 2012-03-15 11:34 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-03-15 04:22 pm (UTC)Here's what I don't like about this. Harley was crazy but at times she displayed sharp rationality which is what made her so dangerous. Now she's just a female Joker.
On the other hand, I like the idea of the two skeletons being other women who the Joker tried to Jokerize but it didn't take.
no subject
Date: 2012-03-15 08:43 pm (UTC)Why does DC think ALL these characters - some of whom aren't even that old (like Harley) need "updating" and modernization? When there was NOTHING wrong with them in the first place.
This is the kind of stuff that makes Harley's last turn in Gotham City Sirens look great in comparison.
no subject
Date: 2012-03-15 10:13 pm (UTC)Nah--I think this is a little better than the end of GCS, but then that's really not a HUGE compliment.
no subject
Date: 2012-03-15 10:15 pm (UTC)