Hulk and Iron Man take the walk of...

[icon_uk]

Well, "shame" might not be the right word...

From Avengers Assemble #11





I ADORE Carol's reaction.. and that Logan brought pop-corn... well, wouldn't you? :)


 

Comments

[shadowpsykie]

there is more than one reason they call him the INCREDIBLE Hulk... :D

and it s like they made this comic just forus :D

[mishalak]

Now I am terribly curious as to the nature of the wager that Hulk and Iron Man lost.

Spoilery answer

[fairestcat]

It was a scientific scavenger hunt type thing, looking for a missing scientist. Team Happy (Tony and Thor) vs. Team Sad (Bruce and Jessica Drew).

The wager involved the loser walking naked from Stark Tower to the Baxter Building, and the final conclusion from the rest of the group was that Tony and Bruce had both lost, so both had to do the public walk of well, not shame in Tony's case...

Re: Spoilery answer

[lbd_nytetrayn]

How were they able to lose, but not their teammates?

Re: Spoilery answer

[fairestcat]

Their teammates ganged up with Steve, Carol, Peter and Logan and elected Bruce and Tony as the representatives from their respective teams.

[bjornwilde]

I know the entire reason of this post has nothing to do with my point here, but I just realized, we now have proof of a date of year for the MU. I think that's the first time I have ever seen an actual year give for the present time.

[icon_uk]

Every Marvel story not deliberately set in the past or future has always been set "no".... it IS supposed to be "the world outside your window" after all.

[bjornwilde]

I know. I just can't think of any other time I've seen an actual date. They always seem to obfuscate it somehow to leave it open for whenever is current.

[his_spiffynesss]

I've seen them refer to years occasionally. And indirectly when they cast te current President in some role, but yes, I can't hink of many other times they specified the date.

[kevinroc]

1/16/13 was the date the comic was released.

[mrstatham]

But they still specify that date in the actual comic itself. They usually don't.

[thezmage]

Shouldn't Tony have some form of chest thing? Scarring at least? Or has he fixed that?

[icon_uk]

Hologram generating nano-implants? He's actually found a use for nipples on men.

[baroncognito]

Which Spider-man is this?

[icon_uk]

I'm going to say it's Peter, and if it gets revealed at some point it's Otto, please don't shatter my illusion.

[sir_razorback]

heh.. Definately a Pete-prank.

[drmcninja]

Until proven otherwise, I still maintain that Superior Spiderman slipped out of continuity, and all spider-antics remain pure.

[darkknightjrk]

First issue of this story came out before all the Freaky Friday stuff, so I'd definitely go with Peter.

[mrstatham]

I think Hickman's said there will be a distinct switchover point where we will distinctly know that the Spider-Man on the Avengers is Otto in Peter's body, sometime after the first arc wraps. So, given he's leading the Avengers titles, I'd imagine Deconnick (she is the one writing this, right?) will be following his lead.

[darkknightjrk]

Yeah, I believe Hickman said the change would come around Avengers #6. And I imagine that Deconnick's stuff will be much the same way--once it changes over, we'll know.

[lencannon]

Hulk, I think you probably don't have a lot to be ashamed about.

[icon_uk]

Yeah, it's that sort of assumption that's the REASON he's ashamed... He's nicknamed it his "puny Banner" for a reason you know...

[akodo_rokku]

Whenever Hulk drops his "the"s and such, he's got the mind of a child. Most kids *would* be pretty embarrassed by this.

[bruinsfan]

Depends on how young a child. I seem to recall kids up to about 5 being perfectly fine running around naked in front of family and assorted visitors without a care in the world.

[thatnickguy]

And suddenly, all the models who were interested in boffing Tony are now trying to get The Hulk's number.

[zabilac]

*smirk* If they're lucky, they might be able to get the Tony/Hulk double package.

[thanekos]

Daily Bugle, pg. 3: " Spider-Man caught taking pictures of naked men in public! "

[deleonjh]

Just erase the last part: "Spider-Man caught taking pictures of naked men!" Factually accurate and borderline libel, it's classic tabloid.

[ladymoondancer]

Ha ha haaaa, oh my God.

Nice job, Peter!

[team_mummy]

Spidey with an un-jammable camera and Daily Bugle hook up for the win

[featheredserpent]

The ultimate in paparazzi shots; You know Peter is thinking "After this, I'll never have to eat instant ramen again!"

[cainofdreaming]

You just know he held on to an analog cam just for such occasion.

[zabilac]

Guess, it payed off after all.

[jenni411]

The part that had me splorting tea out my nose was the scene before this, where Carol says "All right, losers, drop your pants!" and Tony *immediately starts to comply* without actually knowing what's going on.

[bradygirl_12]

The part that had me splorting tea out my nose was the scene before this, where Carol says "All right, losers, drop your pants!" and Tony *immediately starts to comply* without actually knowing what's going on.

LOL! Thank you for cheering up my morning! :)

[jenni411]

You're welcome; it sure cheered up mine!

[bookish_dragon]

Oh Tony, never change...

[dragontail]

That was my favourite part of the issue, too! Made the whole joke even funnier :)

[laurie_ky]

Thanks for posting this. It's made going into work today bearable.

Laurie

[bruinsfan]

The fact that the Baxter Building is one end of the march results in me imagining a disapproving Sue Richards yelling "Gentlemen, need I remind you that MY CHILDREN live here?!?"

And then selectively using her powers in a way that would make our streakers a lot less happy about any pictures being taken...