Justice #2

[history79]

10 pages of 30

Comments

[captainbellman]

Once again...Pamela, I love you, but what is your motivation, honey? What is it that you want?

[rainspirit]

Apocalyptic visions of the future making her regrow empathy for humankind, making the world a better place in the small time she has to atone?

[lego_joker]

This probably makes me sound like a Neanderthal, but the only time I could really get behind Ivy as a character was when she had a twisted crush on Batman.

Objectively speaking, it's probably insanely regressive for the character. Subjectively speaking, it was a view carried out by the likes of Neil Gaiman and P. Craig Russell, and the other takes on Ivy have *never* been executed with that level of talent (even Greg Rucka can only go so far).

[shadur]

A regressive view written by a superb writer that conveys depth to the character is preferable over a progressive view written by a hack that has no idea where he's going, I suppose.

[icon_uk]

The motivation that the Riddler is given in this series is still my favourite. He was beaten whenever he told a lie as a child, to the point that he's pathologically truthful. So he CAN'T commit a crime without admitting to it, so he's masking it by making the truth as cryptic as possible,