Scans_Daily

-
I am amazed and amused by the knots you are tying yourself into. -

Pot, kettle, black.

-So the Russians "subverted" the election by publishing completely innocuous emails? And if the server was "never breached", and "no harm [was] done," how did the Russians publish her emails and supposedly subvert the election?-

The Russian ones were off a DNC hack- and they *also* hacked the RNC, they just didn't share it.

The server ones? Nope, those were clear.


-
So seventeen intelligence agencies say (without having made public any evidence) that the Russians did it? The same seventeen intelligence agencies who said that Iraq had WMD's?-

Actually, no. The agencies never said they had WMD, that was the Administration's conclusion based on the much less conclusive intelligence briefings. Also, there were significantly fewer involved.

Anyway, long story short, it's quite impressive the misinformation and conspiracy theories people have jumped on to.

-
Also, Clinton is completely innocent because the emails that she didn't destroy don't prove any crimes, because innocent people regularly destroy evidence of their innocence. -

Bzzt.
You're literally assuming guilt based on lack of evidence of guilt.

Hillary had lawyers specifically delete personal e-mails, *which she was authorized to do* because those weren't asked for- and note, they aren't gone-gone, the FBI's actually seen 'em. Included stuff like recipies and birthday party plans.

Note how I mentioned everyone has scandals like this- GWB deleted 33 million e-mails.

-
Seriously, though, four years ago, the eighties wanted their foreign policy back. Now we all have to worry about Russian subversion.-

Well, that and massive unconstitutional religious bans, mass deportations, sec of education who thinks child labor laws are bad, sec of energy who wants the department gone, pissing off trade partnets failures to understand foreign policy....

But the twisting to somehow paint 'but her e-mails' as worse is quite impressive.