![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
From Alan Moore and John Totleben in SWAMP THING 60(1987), and brought to mind by this post, which also shows another DC character(Brainiac) being taken over by something very, very similar, making me wonder--perhaps they were the same? Something DC has NOT brought back and explored, and yet they probably should, especially as there are little Swamp Thing/Machine hybrids out there. This is when Alec was exiled to space by Lex Luthor(yep). One day an alien machine intelligence decides it wants babies. It comes across Alec's disembodied consciousness careening through space. What follows? Well...basically it kinda rapes him; sorry, I'm really not sure what else you can call it.
And some amazing collage work from the god known as John Totleben. Remember when experimental art actually appeared in mainstream comics? And when artists could do all this without any computers at all? And when you could buy this for 75 cents?
An excerpt. It was very hard to choose which pages, btw.









no subject
Date: 2010-05-30 02:06 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-05-30 02:07 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-05-30 02:26 am (UTC)You look at his work back then and it's no wonder his eyesight ended up suffering. The amount of work Totleben would put into just one page frightens me.
no subject
Date: 2010-05-30 02:24 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-05-30 02:41 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-05-30 02:42 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-05-30 02:59 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-05-30 03:20 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-05-30 03:29 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-05-30 03:54 am (UTC)A Possibly Sexist Joke, But Humor Has No Ethics
Date: 2010-05-30 04:14 am (UTC)Re: A Possibly Sexist Joke, But Humor Has No Ethics
Date: 2010-05-30 04:30 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-05-30 04:30 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-05-30 09:14 am (UTC)I thought I'd never say this...
Date: 2010-05-30 03:38 am (UTC)I think probably read this issue, I must have, I remember the whole Swamp Thing in space and the planet of blue. I loved the planet of blue issue. But I do not for the life of my remember this.
no subject
Date: 2010-05-30 03:42 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-05-30 03:44 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-05-30 03:52 am (UTC)I have a soft spot for pre-computer era graphics. Some stuff, THIS STUFF, just can't be done anymore, and the world is a sad place because of it.
no subject
Date: 2010-05-30 04:13 am (UTC)People could still do this kind of stuff--it's just that they don't. The means are all still there.
no subject
Date: 2010-05-30 05:37 am (UTC)I still do hand-collaging. Photoshop just doesn't give me the same satisfaction.
And these pages rock. 8)
no subject
Date: 2010-05-30 01:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-05-30 04:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-05-30 04:15 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-05-30 04:19 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-05-30 11:36 am (UTC)Alan Moore writes the *weirdest* sex-scenes.
no subject
Date: 2010-05-30 01:44 pm (UTC)It just gets weirder, doesn't it?
no subject
Date: 2010-05-30 11:56 am (UTC)(The bastards started reprinting it in a new edition, with (IIRC) new volume-divisions, just after I started buying up the old ones.)
no subject
Date: 2010-05-30 12:11 pm (UTC)Yep. And MIRACLEMAN as well, especially OLYMPUS.
John Totleben(along with Steve Bissette) is one of the reasons I do comics.
no subject
Date: 2010-05-30 12:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-05-30 12:55 pm (UTC)And in anticipation of same I made a killing on Ebay with the volumes I had since the 80s...after scanning them, of course...
no subject
Date: 2010-05-30 01:10 pm (UTC)This may still leave the ownership of the Moore/Gaiman run in doubt. Could be owned by Neil Gaiman (who has said in the past he'd be happy to work with Marvel), could be owned by Todd McFarlane.
Marvel has stated intentions to reprint a lot of the old Mick Anglo stories, and been resolutely silent on the subject of the later Moore/Gaiman run. What really scares me is how excited Joe Quesada is about the Anglo stuff. As though acquiring the rights to thse generic late-Golden-Age Captain Marvel knockoff stories is the exciting part. Whenever an interviewer asks JQ about the Moore/Gaiman stuff, he changes the subject.
no subject
Date: 2010-05-30 01:12 pm (UTC)Well, very glad I made CBRs of 'em. I was starting to be afraid reading the books might damage them over time. Those awful brittle bindings Eclipse had and all...
no subject
Date: 2010-05-30 01:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-05-30 01:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-05-30 01:24 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-05-30 01:25 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-05-30 01:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-06-02 07:25 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-06-02 07:43 am (UTC)You can hold onto a trademark forever, but only if you keep it in use. This is why, for instance, Xerox fights the genericization of their name, and also why DC and Marvel periodically revive characters*--if in disuse long enough, they would lapse like the Nedor characters did. Without the trademark basis, i.e. a comic appearance(because comics is the primary medium of the creation--also why you still see a Popeye strip in a few papers), the value of their intellectual property bank goes down, with ripple effects. And merchandising is put at risk.
*Making me wonder what the period in trademark law is that has to pass before a lapse, and if there's any correlation to the cycles of character revivals were you to try to correlate it. But I am no statistician.