sd_admin: (Default)
[personal profile] sd_admin posting in [community profile] scans_daily
First an announcement: While modbot seemed like a good idea at the time, it's proved to be unpopular with members. From now on we'll be using it only for admin posts, so that they can be edited by all members of the mod team.


We know that some members have had issues with the community and the mod team, and felt like they couldn't bring them to our attention. Here is your chance. If you've got a question, concern or suggestion about Scans Daily, here's where you can post it.

This post will be linked to in our profile, and checked regularly by the mods. Comments won't be screened, so you can suggest amongst yourselves.

Date: 2010-07-21 04:56 pm (UTC)
stubbleupdate: (Default)
From: [personal profile] stubbleupdate
As for how to take the multiple posts re: "if you can't take the ethos, you should probably go elsewhere," that would be one thing if it were simply applied to people who show up and have trouble with the larger minority issues being discussed. But that's not all it's applied to. That warning is liberally applied to anyone, longtime poster or new, who has trouble with the current rules and the moderation policy.

So, because you've been here for a while, rules should apply to you differently than they would to a new poster?

Date: 2010-07-22 08:45 pm (UTC)
From: [personal profile] moneyless_jew
I just realized I missed this one because I was only ordered to shut the fuck up in the other thread, and not this one.

To answer your quick question which had nothing to do with what I wrote - no, I do not want rules applied differently to anyone, that is my entire point in here.

Date: 2010-07-23 04:55 pm (UTC)
stubbleupdate: (Default)
From: [personal profile] stubbleupdate
Perhaps I'm being dense, but when you say That warning is liberally applied to anyone, longtime poster or new, who has trouble with the current rules and the moderation policy. and give the impression that you think it is a bad thing, surely you are complaining about the rules being applied the same way for everybody.

Date: 2010-07-23 06:09 pm (UTC)
From: [personal profile] moneyless_jew
Surely not. That's not what I meant at all. When I refer to old posters and new, what I'm talking about is the blanket assumption on the part of the mods that anyone who might take issue with their recent moderation policy must actually have issues with feminism, queer issues and anti-oppression. This despite longtime posters expressing misgivings about the comm's current system. Everyone is pigeonholed.

Profile

scans_daily: (Default)
Scans Daily

Extras

Founded by girl geeks and members of the slash fandom, [community profile] scans_daily strives to provide an atmosphere which is LGBTQ-friendly, anti-racist, anti-ableist, woman-friendly and otherwise discrimination and harassment free.

Bottom line: If slash, feminism or anti-oppressive practice makes you react negatively, [community profile] scans_daily is probably not for you.

Please read the community ethos and rules before posting or commenting.

April 2025

S M T W T F S
   1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 2223242526
27282930   

Most Popular Tags