![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
I have a question about Huntress and Arsenal's one night stand so of course I turn to the lovely ladies and gents of scans_daily to hopefully find the answer.
The first I heard of it was in BoP: Dinah, Babs and Helena are meeting in a park to discuss whether or not they can work together as a team and the subject of Helena's one night stands with Dick and Roy comes up and Helena has the brilliant line 'Archers... they pull a mighty bow but they're quick to let fly'. Which of course pisses Dinah off royally and nearly ends the team before it even begins.
I went back and read the Outsiders issues where Helena takes Roy's place on the team while he recovers from being shot, thinking that would be where I could find the Huntress/Arsenal stuff (I'm a massive Huntress fan and I've been trying to track down and read pretty much everything she's been in because yes I am obsessive) but apart from the kiss at the end

there's not really any interaction between the two and certainly no sexy times going on between the pair.
So folks my question is this: is this the first time it's ever referenced or is does the Helena/Roy stuff happen in different issues to the ones I've been reading?
The first I heard of it was in BoP: Dinah, Babs and Helena are meeting in a park to discuss whether or not they can work together as a team and the subject of Helena's one night stands with Dick and Roy comes up and Helena has the brilliant line 'Archers... they pull a mighty bow but they're quick to let fly'. Which of course pisses Dinah off royally and nearly ends the team before it even begins.
I went back and read the Outsiders issues where Helena takes Roy's place on the team while he recovers from being shot, thinking that would be where I could find the Huntress/Arsenal stuff (I'm a massive Huntress fan and I've been trying to track down and read pretty much everything she's been in because yes I am obsessive) but apart from the kiss at the end

there's not really any interaction between the two and certainly no sexy times going on between the pair.
So folks my question is this: is this the first time it's ever referenced or is does the Helena/Roy stuff happen in different issues to the ones I've been reading?
no subject
Date: 2011-01-16 08:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-01-16 08:53 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-01-16 10:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-01-17 08:20 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2011-01-16 09:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-01-16 09:32 pm (UTC)Of all the men she's been linked with - Charlie, Dick, Roy and Thomas - she didn't sleep with a single one of them 'because they're hot'.
Well, except Roy. I don't know WHY she got with Roy which is the thing that's bugging me most about the way it's just kind of dropped in at the end of her time with the outsiders.
As for the others, well they ARE hot of course but there where other reasons for her to be with them apart from just hotness.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2011-01-16 10:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-01-16 10:17 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-01-16 11:16 pm (UTC)maybe its just this community but his "Is there anyone you WONT sleep with" came out like either "Roy, YOU bitch, i thought i was the only one," or "Dammit Roy, why won't you LOVE ME!"
no subject
Date: 2011-01-16 11:19 pm (UTC);D
no subject
Date: 2011-01-16 11:20 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-01-16 11:31 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2011-01-17 12:11 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-01-17 01:11 am (UTC)The reading order is all over the goddamn place.
no subject
Date: 2011-01-17 02:45 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-01-17 03:03 am (UTC)At least it's an archer's bicep and not, say, Plastic Man. Yay for the small things?
(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2011-01-17 03:16 am (UTC)I think that in looking over the art, the blackness of the cape created a visual "mass" there and I completely missed that her waist is about the size of two forefingers.
That is really shameful.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2011-01-17 04:13 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-01-17 04:50 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-01-17 10:12 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-01-17 06:52 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-01-17 10:09 am (UTC)Quite possibly what I find most offensive about this issue, far more than the idea of Helena sleeping with Roy, is that Winnick has her talking like an extra from Cluseless ('Aw man it's all under my costume and stuff. Dude.') and she apparently only has one comeback in her vocabulary ('eat this, hero.') which she uses twice in as many pages.
Score zero for meaningful and snappy dialogue, Winnick.
no subject
Date: 2011-01-17 12:14 pm (UTC)Also, ew, Soulpatch
no subject
Date: 2011-01-17 12:24 pm (UTC)Simone and Rucka do a pretty good job of it IMO.
But to be honest Simone and Rucka are pretty much the only writers that seem to understand how to write Helena at all.
no subject
Date: 2011-01-17 03:16 pm (UTC)Now, thanks to Winick, all of a sudden she'll go to bed with anyone - whether it be Roy or Josh the parking attendant who treated her like a piece of meat (though I think Gail was actually using that to move Helena away from this characterization). Prior to her "guest" appearance in Outsiders she had not only never seen to be the slightest bit interested in Roy - she had never had scenes with him, and after this (aside from the BoP mention which seemed like another Gail meta-comment on this Outsiders thing) she never mentions him again - and has had no scenes with him since.
Winick basically brought her onto the book just for this. So she could be used as a sexual sparring joke between Roy and Dick (who've both slept with her - ha, ha, right, Judd). It's not even about her.
Winick does that a lot. Reading back the Lost Days of Red Hood mini he sexed up Talia more than she had ever had been before (she has sex with nameless minion AND Jason in story where she's a supporting character) and the whole point of the story seemed to be getting to Jason and Talia having sex. Literally that was the climax (pardon the pun) of the entire mini-series and what it seemed all to be building up to. And just like this Outsiders story it was a story about the GUY where the woman in question is basically used as a prop and nothing more.
In case anyone missed I really, really, REALLY hate this story.
no subject
Date: 2011-01-17 06:18 pm (UTC)Except that if anything, the exchange seems to be about Roy and his promiscuity. He's the one getting negative judgement from Dick, however mild it might be. Dinah and Helena's joking over Roy was in much, much poorer taste than anything Dick and Roy said - particularly considering Dinah's relationship with Roy.
prior to this she was never presented as a casual sex with no feelings kind of person
Not everyone agrees that that is such a terrible thing to be. I actually find Simone's portrayal of Helena's sexuality far more offensive. I'd take a happy slut any day over a woman who sleeps with Josh just because she has low self-esteem, then decides to "reform." Ugh. Then again, I've always hated the trope that women only sleep around because they have emotional issues.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:Mod note!
From:no subject
Date: 2011-01-18 12:17 am (UTC)