Catwoman #6
Feb. 18th, 2012 12:11 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
I didn't think it was possible for this book to get anymore problematic, but I stand corrected.
WARNING: for graphic eroticised violence.
4 pages speak for themselves


And then the inevitable confrontation with the Dark Knight himself.


..............
Dear Winick,
Helena Wayne called. And right now she's feeling like unleashing her own personal brand of justice after the way you've shat on both her mum and dad by writing rubbish such as this. And "rubbish" is being *very* polite. This. THIS is just not "sexy" at all.

WARNING: for graphic eroticised violence.
4 pages speak for themselves


And then the inevitable confrontation with the Dark Knight himself.


..............
Dear Winick,
Helena Wayne called. And right now she's feeling like unleashing her own personal brand of justice after the way you've shat on both her mum and dad by writing rubbish such as this. And "rubbish" is being *very* polite. This. THIS is just not "sexy" at all.

no subject
Date: 2012-02-18 06:43 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-02-18 06:55 pm (UTC)As for the art, I don't recall the art ever being like this, nor was the tone of his book like Winnick's, which is setting out to be deliberately cheesecakey, it would seem. Brubaker did, however, have artists like Cameron Stewart and Darwyn Cooke on board.
no subject
Date: 2012-02-18 07:13 pm (UTC)1-25 of Catwoman had brilliant, classy, heavily stylised art. 26-37(I think) however, had a much more classic comic book style of art, which sometimes was quite cheesecakey. Couple of random examples:
no subject
Date: 2012-02-18 08:36 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-02-18 08:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-02-18 08:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-02-18 09:46 pm (UTC)Is this Gulacy? It looks really quite similar to his stuff in Prey, almost.