![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)

I really liked Yondu in 'Guardians of the Galaxy' (Michael Rooker steals the show as usual). But for all intents and purposes he was a pretty different character from the comics.
And now with the upcoming Star-Lord #2...

Yep, looks like MCU Yondu is now in the comics. They also seem to be lifting the father figure/Ravagers leader angle from the film as well.
Not something I'm losing sleep over but it's one of those things where you just have to shake your head at how transparent Marvel has become in making their comics movie tie-ins.
no subject
Date: 2015-09-15 09:36 pm (UTC)Plus, if they ever want to undo it or "fix" it, they could easily just explain that the original Yondu, in the future, is an ancestor with the same name.
no subject
Date: 2015-09-15 09:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-09-15 10:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-09-15 10:06 pm (UTC)There was an accident with a contraceptive and a time machine."
no subject
Date: 2015-09-16 03:36 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-09-15 11:45 pm (UTC)I'm not sure how they'd explain the head-crest/fin... how often have we seen members of his species in the present to know if they have full-on fins or not? I guess they can either go with the "things change over time" or "different sub-species" like with the Klingon discrepancy.
As changes made to get closer with the movies go, this one bothers me less than many. If it helps draw the movie-watching audience into the comics at all, it means sales improve and Marvel is willing to take chances. :)
no subject
Date: 2015-09-16 12:01 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-09-16 01:06 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-09-16 11:13 am (UTC)