Not the greatest Batman story ever, but still a reasonably decent comic. Addmitdly it's probably because Azzarello apparently did the majority of the story but I did enjoy it.
It was mostly nice to have heroes in anything created by Frank Miller not be completely self-righteous, obnoxious assholes.
I was never a fan of Miller's style but the artwork in the epilouge was atrocious. There's a shot of Hal where his head is clearly not aligned with his body, and one where Wonder Woman sends a spear through a dragons head and it's facial expression is just "duh".
Yeah, I kind saw the whole rejuvenation thing coming, and frankly it disappoints me.
People talk a lot about the legacy of TDKR being sullied by the sequels, but I think there's a genuine disconnect between this and TDKR. TDKR was all about Miller (as a relatively young man) dealing with themes of mortality and change, but this straight up ends with what I can only call a retreat from the idea of mortality. It's coming from a much older writer whose relationship with his own mortality has almost certainly changed, and maybe there's something to dig into there, but it's a disappointing nonetheless.
Personally I'm always annoyed by stories set in the future which contrive to put Bruce Wayne back into the Batman role rather than having him pass it on. Here, Superman/Batman Generations, the Scott Snyder version of the future which we saw briefly in his Batman run all did it, and it just doesn't click for me. The whole idea of Batman, almost from inception, has been defined by the people he inspires and trains, so I've always felt that for Bruce Wayne to be a success as Batman his legacy has to be those people whom he inspired.
Founded by girl geeks and members of the slash fandom, scans_daily strives to provide an atmosphere which is LGBTQ-friendly, anti-racist, anti-ableist, woman-friendly and otherwise discrimination and harassment free.
Bottom line: If slash, feminism or anti-oppressive practice makes you react negatively, scans_daily is probably not for you.
no subject
Date: 2017-06-07 04:17 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2017-06-07 04:31 pm (UTC)It was mostly nice to have heroes in anything created by Frank Miller not be completely self-righteous, obnoxious assholes.
no subject
Date: 2017-06-07 04:39 pm (UTC)Who is the new Batman?
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2017-06-07 04:41 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2017-06-08 12:44 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2017-06-08 02:39 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2017-06-08 03:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2017-06-08 03:48 pm (UTC)"Bat... woman.... I'm so proud..."
no subject
Date: 2017-06-09 01:26 am (UTC)People talk a lot about the legacy of TDKR being sullied by the sequels, but I think there's a genuine disconnect between this and TDKR. TDKR was all about Miller (as a relatively young man) dealing with themes of mortality and change, but this straight up ends with what I can only call a retreat from the idea of mortality. It's coming from a much older writer whose relationship with his own mortality has almost certainly changed, and maybe there's something to dig into there, but it's a disappointing nonetheless.
Personally I'm always annoyed by stories set in the future which contrive to put Bruce Wayne back into the Batman role rather than having him pass it on. Here, Superman/Batman Generations, the Scott Snyder version of the future which we saw briefly in his Batman run all did it, and it just doesn't click for me. The whole idea of Batman, almost from inception, has been defined by the people he inspires and trains, so I've always felt that for Bruce Wayne to be a success as Batman his legacy has to be those people whom he inspired.