Ah.... okay... So is there another reason that everyone in the GCPD reacting like the Joker is the worst criminal EVER then?
If you have to change the premise of the character this much, then it's not really showcasing him as a flipside of Batman is it? (And I don't even LIKE "Super-murder-death-kill" Joker)
Making parallels with how Real World police treat certain people -- Black, Latinx, mentally ill -- as being far worse threats than the actually are, and are thus disproportionately subject to police brutality?
Yeah this doesn't work for me. I mean sure when you apply Real world standards to the Bat comics it falls completely apart and stops being an escapist hero fantasy and becomes a terrifying tale of a guy in a bat suit committing all kinds of legally and morally reprehensible actions in his crusade for vengeance for a tragic event.
Which is why I always hate when writers decide to bring the real world into it rather it is to discredit the claim (news flash it doesn't only sticks out as a shoddy attempt to say how wrong the criticism is) I mean let Batman be the fantasy it is in a world where vigilantes can be good things instead of nightmare fuel incarnate.
Which brings me to my problem with this on one hand every critism this joker levels would apply in the real world and in a deconstruction comic using a batman stand in might make a good story line. But it doesn't work in a Batman comic tied to a wider world and someone like the joker now sane or not should not be the one bringing it up if your going to bring it up at all. Which again IMO is not somethign that hsould be happening in a batman comic.
Not that taken with this. If this Joker isn't a mass murdering dangerous psychopath, then he should be treated as if he's any of a dozen of Batman's far less dangerous villains. If he IS, then sudden bout of sanity or not, he's never getting out, no matter how he appears now. 'He's better now' might allow him some degree of lattitude or legal recourse, possibly even escaping criminal prosecution (thought it would take years to resolve that) but his sanity now would immediately open him up to civil cases from his victims.
My main problem, though, is that if you're going to lean-in to real world elements, firstly you need to fully lean-in to them and second, you need to actually read up on those elements. Joker, for example, should be saying specifically that Batman is agent of the GCPD...the signal is evidential, but there are tons of examples of Batman acting with the tacit approval of the GCPD, thereby making him a legal agent of them (and thus making them liable). Of course, the standards for prosecuting and finding police officers guilty is higher and juries usually expect a higher standard of proof...and even then, penalties are generally lighter.
Plus, if you're going to go down this road, you start wondering about the larger implications. Why hasn't anyone attempted to sue Batman or the GCPD before? Why does everyone accept Batman, the villains or any number of shenanigans with just a shrug. Why hasn't the government intervened in the obvious crisis happening in Gotham? The more realism you introduce, the more the fantasy can't bear the weight and it becomes self-defeating.
I think this is an interesting idea, but this execution seems...muddy for me.
Founded by girl geeks and members of the slash fandom, scans_daily strives to provide an atmosphere which is LGBTQ-friendly, anti-racist, anti-ableist, woman-friendly and otherwise discrimination and harassment free.
Bottom line: If slash, feminism or anti-oppressive practice makes you react negatively, scans_daily is probably not for you.
no subject
Date: 2017-10-04 02:26 pm (UTC)I really, really liked the Jokester. I wish he hadn't been killed :(
no subject
Date: 2017-10-04 02:46 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2017-10-04 03:46 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2017-10-04 03:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2017-10-04 03:57 pm (UTC)If you have to change the premise of the character this much, then it's not really showcasing him as a flipside of Batman is it? (And I don't even LIKE "Super-murder-death-kill" Joker)
no subject
Date: 2017-10-04 04:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2017-10-04 08:48 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2017-10-05 11:19 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2017-10-04 11:00 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2017-10-05 03:40 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2017-10-05 02:37 am (UTC)An odd choice, but I think toning him down like that is the only way a redemption story could work.
no subject
Date: 2017-10-04 07:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2017-10-04 10:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2017-10-04 10:49 pm (UTC)Which is why I always hate when writers decide to bring the real world into it rather it is to discredit the claim (news flash it doesn't only sticks out as a shoddy attempt to say how wrong the criticism is) I mean let Batman be the fantasy it is in a world where vigilantes can be good things instead of nightmare fuel incarnate.
Which brings me to my problem with this on one hand every critism this joker levels would apply in the real world and in a deconstruction comic using a batman stand in might make a good story line. But it doesn't work in a Batman comic tied to a wider world and someone like the joker now sane or not should not be the one bringing it up if your going to bring it up at all. Which again IMO is not somethign that hsould be happening in a batman comic.
no subject
Date: 2017-10-05 12:15 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2017-10-05 01:55 pm (UTC)My main problem, though, is that if you're going to lean-in to real world elements, firstly you need to fully lean-in to them and second, you need to actually read up on those elements. Joker, for example, should be saying specifically that Batman is agent of the GCPD...the signal is evidential, but there are tons of examples of Batman acting with the tacit approval of the GCPD, thereby making him a legal agent of them (and thus making them liable). Of course, the standards for prosecuting and finding police officers guilty is higher and juries usually expect a higher standard of proof...and even then, penalties are generally lighter.
Plus, if you're going to go down this road, you start wondering about the larger implications. Why hasn't anyone attempted to sue Batman or the GCPD before? Why does everyone accept Batman, the villains or any number of shenanigans with just a shrug. Why hasn't the government intervened in the obvious crisis happening in Gotham? The more realism you introduce, the more the fantasy can't bear the weight and it becomes self-defeating.
I think this is an interesting idea, but this execution seems...muddy for me.
no subject
Date: 2017-10-05 03:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2017-10-08 07:57 am (UTC)