30 Days of Night #3
Dec. 11th, 2018 08:24 am
"Vampires weren’t scary anymore. Dracula has become a joke, on TV vampires date teenage girls and we have breakfast cereals named after vampires. When Anne Rice 'humanised' vampires she was pulling vampires from B-movies and making them sophisticated creatures with feelings and emotions. That was new then. It revolutionized vampires.
Unfortunately it also tamed them. Rice made us want to be vampires. I wanted to make them scary again. It really was just that simple. The vampires in 30 Days of Night could care less about seducing you. They want your blood and all the begging and praying in the world won’t stop them." -- Steve Niles








no subject
Date: 2018-12-11 02:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2018-12-11 02:54 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2018-12-11 03:49 pm (UTC)plus they had that spooky little girl with the pigtails which has uh. been done.
Not a comment on the comic's quality or anything.
no subject
Date: 2018-12-11 04:06 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2018-12-11 04:27 pm (UTC)I like what Templesmith said last time more- that they've just been done so many ways- but even he gets in on that whole vampires that aren't my vampires suck thing. I don't know. I guess I'm not seeing what's so strikingly original about them, though I do like the lamprey-shark mouths.
no subject
Date: 2018-12-11 09:14 pm (UTC)This doesn't ring as true today. A lot of people have told Scary Vampire stories since 30DoN came out. American Vampire is a favorite of mine.
This series is very much an artifact of it's time, but it was innovative in that it was the tipping point back to Vampires being monsters.
no subject
Date: 2018-12-12 09:41 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2018-12-12 10:05 pm (UTC)That said, people have a right to not like things. You can't take it as a personal affront if someone dislikes something you enjoy. Criticism is not a bad act.
If he were making fun of people who like Twilight, that would be rude, but he isn't. He is saying that he found them (Sparkle-Pires) laughable. That's his opinion. You are welcome to not like it, but it's a bit of a stretch to say he is insulting you just because he criticizes things you like.
Hell, turn it around and make fun of him for viewing a monster that was meant to be an incarnation of Victorian fears of female sexuality: a curruptor and a defiler, and making it a simple tooth and claw monster story.
no subject
Date: 2018-12-13 01:00 pm (UTC)Where we disagree is that I think he /is/ making fun of people who like things that aren't the things he likes, and that specifically here he's aiming it at the stereotypical twilight fan- teenage girls. The vitriol aimed at teenage girls for everything they do is unpleasant. That's the issue.
no subject
Date: 2018-12-13 01:36 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2018-12-13 01:55 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2018-12-13 02:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2018-12-13 02:17 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2018-12-13 02:28 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2018-12-13 02:30 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2018-12-12 03:43 am (UTC)Yeah, along with misrepresenting the history of horror (funny 'defanged' vampires go way back, man).
no subject
Date: 2018-12-12 03:41 am (UTC)//eyeroll
Blame Bela Lugosi if you want to whine about people who made vampires sophisticated and desirable, buddy.
(First successful horror comedy film with vampires: Abbott and Costello Meet Frankenstein. With Lugosi. 1948.)
no subject
Date: 2018-12-12 03:48 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2018-12-12 09:41 am (UTC)