![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
Two new covers for the upcoming relaunches of Avengers and New Avengers, revealing a few more potential team-members.
First, for New Avengers:

Four of the five were previously announced, but this clears up any lingering speculation that Ms. Marvel is going to be Siege cannon fodder. I never thought that was likely, but nice to see it put to rest.
Over in Avengers:

Are Peter and Logan pulling double-duty, or are they just guesting? I'm guessing the generic blond guy in the back there is Steve.
Hi Simon...oh dear.

title: new avengers, title: avengers, creator: john romita jr., creator: stuart immonen, publisher: marvel comics
no subject
Date: 2010-03-19 11:47 pm (UTC)"My hands are growing out of my back! Oh the humanity! I never should have taken those ionic steroids."
no subject
Date: 2010-03-19 11:48 pm (UTC)Also, I sort of want Steve to be heroing in a t-shirt and jeans. Eh, why bother with a costume.
And everyone's fingers are rolled flat. I see you, John Romita Jr. And I don't know what position Wonder Man's legs are meant to be in but I guess it might explain all the looks of shock.
I like the first one. Wolverine's jaw is a little alarming, but overall, I like it. That's an absolute tank of a team.
no subject
Date: 2010-03-20 03:02 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-20 07:51 am (UTC)I like him on his own creator owned projects. His art is very interesting, and he has a good eye for storytelling. But I really don't like his art on established Marvel characters.
no subject
Date: 2010-03-20 11:39 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-21 02:17 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-20 10:18 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-22 05:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-19 11:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-19 11:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-20 12:11 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-20 12:26 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-20 02:29 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-20 02:22 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-20 02:24 am (UTC)Carol has energy blasts too.
I agree it's not a diverse lineup, but I imagine Bendis will be using this team for lower level crime stuff.
no subject
Date: 2010-03-20 07:25 am (UTC)But, yeah... lotta tanks there.
no subject
Date: 2010-03-20 12:07 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-20 12:12 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-20 02:02 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-20 03:11 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-20 04:06 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-20 03:41 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-21 11:29 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-20 02:30 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-20 05:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-20 12:20 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-20 12:35 am (UTC)The Avengers roster is going to be an all-white team? Okay, admittedly, that's certainly very retro. I'd hardly say it's something I'm nostalgic for, though.
I just have to...
Date: 2010-03-20 01:03 am (UTC)Re: I just have to...
Date: 2010-03-20 05:34 am (UTC)Re: I just have to...
Date: 2010-03-20 09:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-20 07:29 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-21 01:58 am (UTC)In all honesty, this is sad. Maybe I'm wrong, I probably am, but when I came into comics in the mid 90s, it seemed the Avengers were all characters who I (Mostly) had not heard of before. And it *worked* for me. That became the type of team book I want. The one whose full of heroes who don't have their own books. In a better selling system, maybe their own mini series, but not their own books. It made the book seem more...important.
Because for me, I'm all about the character. I don't care what gender the character is, or the colour of their skin (Unless the writer just loves stereotypes or colorist can't handle it. Hi Monet, and Conner), I just love *characters* and the story arcs they can go through. So team books always felt to me as if they were a deal. You got the same amount of story in 22 pages as other books, but more characters, so (possibly) more character development.
Of course this was the 90s. So maybe the development wasn't always good....
no subject
Date: 2010-03-20 12:48 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-20 01:02 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-20 03:05 am (UTC)And Luke needs his old name back. I like "Power Man". And he needs a costume. Not that ugly thing he used to wear, but something cool. I remember they had a crossover where he was wearing PRIME's costume. Very cool.
no subject
Date: 2010-03-20 03:14 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-20 06:09 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-20 08:15 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-20 09:02 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-20 01:25 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-20 03:41 pm (UTC)I mean the idea that superheroes have to wear a costume is just ridiculous. I don't see a problem at all with Cage wearing just casual clothes. I've never really seen what he's wearing as grunge either. The casuals fit his character extremely well, and if anything, I would love for Jessica to go into battle wearing casuals, alongside of him.
Costumes are all well and good, but, really I don't read superhero comics for them. Especially since most of them are horribly impractical and stupid.
If he absolutely had to wear a costume, I'd prefer it be a team-wide, low key affair like Quitely's X-Men designs.
Ask ME a rhetorical question will you
Date: 2010-03-21 02:09 am (UTC)Ah. Yes, I was being slightly mocking. But 'there is truth in humor!'
The problem is definitions. Stories about people with extranormal powers are either scifi or fantasy. People who dedicate their lives to heroic altruism are often termed 'adventurers' in modern settings; to my knowledge, only the Greeks called such people 'heroes' (I expect this is where the definition of the hero as the protagonist came from. The protagonist might be the hero of the story, but he does not have to be a hero.). There was no expectation of a particular moral code, killing the enemy was pretty much expected. The morality play part came in from the conflicts with the orders of actual gods or large-scale politics.
However, the modern definition of 'hero' is different. Quickly checking the dictionary to avoid rampant stupidity..
1. a man of distinguished courage or ability, admired for his brave deeds and noble qualities.
2. a person who, in the opinion of others, has heroic qualities or has performed a heroic act and is regarded as a model or ideal: He was a local hero when he saved the drowning child.
3. the principal male character in a story, play, film, etc.
4. Classical Mythology.
a. a being of godlike prowess and beneficence who often came to be honored as a divinity.
b. (in the Homeric period) a warrior-chieftain of special strength, courage, or ability.
c. (in later antiquity) an immortal being; demigod.
For this conversation, I shall define hero as a person who attempts brave, noble deeds. Feeding the hungry is noble, but not brave. Jumping over Niagara Falls is brave, but not noble.
The superhero genre is a particular form. Not mere scifi or fantasy, it's characterized by a costume, probably originally meant to be part of the 'show' of the story, but definitely underlining that this person was outside the norms of society. Not all superhero-types have powers, the pulp heroes fall within this genre. To give an example, I love the anti-hero Mike Hammer, who runs around shooting bad guys, but he isn't a pulp hero. He's just a a guy. His setting is--I think--noir, meaning he is the only one who sees injustice and is willing and able to do whatever is necessary to combat it, the cops usually being useless or corrupt. In order for Hammer to be a pulp hero, he'd have to wear a distinctive outfit and deliberately go out looking for injustice, instead of nonchalantly waiting for it to be brought to his PI office.
So, thinking as I go...the 'superhero' is generally defined by looking for injustice in some manner and having a distinctive look, and more narrowly by being heroic--anti-heroes using more ignoble means to combat injustice (ignoble varying depending on your point of view). Nexus and Punisher are super-anti-heroes.
Now, Luke was always a little different. He dressed like a hero, but he tried to get paid for his heroics..things just aren't the same as ancient times, when people felt more obligated by your protection...but he was NEVER just a mercernary. I remember one time when Luke took down some muggers and the cops mocked him by throwing him a dime, because they said that was the only reason he did the heroics. He was deeply hurt and offended. But, as evidenced by those ancients and the modern Avengers' paychecks, getting PAID does not make your actions not heroic. Firemen are always heroic. Police are often heroic. Soldiers are sometimes heroic. But most of us who took the job *for* money wouldn't get offended if someone suggested we *only* did it for the money. People who joined the military because of 9/11? VERY upset at the idea of being used against someone who may not be a bad guy.
What you're talking about is wanting to read a story about bodyguard/private detectives/cops with cool powers. Like the Daughters of the Dragon. But they're not strictly superheroes. Almost..but not quite. The Black Widow is also on the shady side of the genre, but she is portrayed enough acting as a superhero to count. Also, the costume. Defying some conventions can make a character interesting, but too many and the character becomes pointless in that particular setting.
Especially in comic books, the visual is important. We see that these people are different. We see that they have really interesting looks that most people can't get away with in real life. Many of those looks serve double purpose to call back to the gods whose superegos ruled morality. Most unfortunately, when I say Luke looks like Generic Black Man, its due to the poor artwork that means you can't really tell him apart from any other black man who might happen to be in his civilian clothes in the picture. Costumes allow us to figure out that this blond woman is Invisible Woman, instead of Ms Marvel, or any other blond woman standing around. They allow us as fans to feel good when we see the costume, not go "who the hell is that?" They allow marketing, and the publicizing of this particular person. Luke hasn't got a lot of marketing/publicizing ability right now.
Luke as superpowered guy is fine if that's the kind of story you want to read, but in my superhero comics I like when the heroes are actual superheroes. Not just guys. If you're going to read a genre, respect it's conventions.
I freely admit I've never been to college and I might be wrong in my literary assumptions.
no subject
Date: 2010-03-20 01:03 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-20 01:16 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-20 02:32 am (UTC)As there's already plenty of Avengers books, why not make every team book an Avengers book and cut to the chase?
no subject
Date: 2010-03-20 01:05 am (UTC)If you have two people who run around in very similar costumes, if only a small piece of the full costume is show, it's best if you get the elements that are visible right. Head wings, for example, aren't interchangeable.
Signed,
Fans of Steve Rogers and Bucky Barnes
no subject
Date: 2010-03-20 01:12 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-20 01:34 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-20 01:37 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-20 01:38 am (UTC)I don't really mind Bendis as much as some, but I could use SOMEONE else too on the Avengers.
no subject
Date: 2010-03-20 02:11 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-20 02:14 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-20 02:32 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-20 01:59 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-20 02:24 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-20 02:28 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-20 01:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-20 02:44 am (UTC)...Also, are there going to be two Hawkeyes now?
no subject
Date: 2010-03-20 02:46 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-21 12:34 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-20 09:42 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-20 01:46 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-20 09:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-20 03:01 am (UTC)Personally, I like WonderMan as a good guy. One of the very first books I made sure I had a full run of was Wonderman, back when I first got into comics. I found him to be an interesting character for one reason or another. I'm a bit bummed that it looks like he will be eeeevvviiillllll now.
no subject
Date: 2010-03-20 03:16 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-20 06:11 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-20 03:24 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-20 04:24 am (UTC)Ugh, Romita Jnr
Date: 2010-03-20 07:28 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-20 08:36 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-20 09:48 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-20 12:00 pm (UTC)Wolverine is on 4 teams (X-Men, X-Force and the 2 different avengers teams) and appearing in in six different team books. Not counting his other titles.
Spider-Man is on two Avengers teams has a million of his own books and is guest starring everywhere. So much for being a loner.
The Thing is on the FF *and* the Avengers now. What is he the Flash???
Luke Cage is an Avenger and in charge of the Thunderbolts.
All the characters that Marvel has at their disposal and these are the teams we get?
Guess Hank Pym is going back to being a nobody again, huh?
no subject
Date: 2010-03-20 05:09 pm (UTC)A girl can dream.
no subject
Date: 2010-03-20 05:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-20 05:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-21 06:20 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-20 04:48 pm (UTC)Luke Cage.
Ms. Marvel.
Wolverine.
Spider-Man.
EARTH'S MIGHTIEST HEROES!!!
That's a weak, weak-ass team.
no subject
Date: 2010-03-20 05:55 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-20 07:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-21 03:39 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-21 06:20 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-20 08:38 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-20 10:38 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-22 05:41 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-21 04:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-20 05:54 pm (UTC)As for the Thing? Why?
Honestly though, I was very meh when they debuted the cast for the current Mighty Avengers and that, IMO, has been the best Avengers team in a long time.
no subject
Date: 2010-03-21 12:14 pm (UTC)"Where is team two? We'll..ah...get back to you on that."
Three issues and lots of shredded clothing later, they show up.
no subject
Date: 2010-03-21 05:46 pm (UTC)