![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
In the first Perfect Moment, we saw Dick announce his intention to give up being Robin to the Titans, these are his oldest friends and staunchest allies, people he trusts implicitly and shares a bond with.
Now comes the trickier part, telling his Dad..
It's important to remember that this is pre-Crisis, Jason Todd was also an orphaned acrobat, a genuinely nice kid, No street punk angst here.
Also that Batman would never DREAM of telling Dick (especially one over the age of 18) what heroic identity he could, or could not hold. It's a consistent flaw in the post-Crisis Jason Todd Mk2 universe that Bruce Wayne feels he has the right and authority to dictate what identity Dick uses, never mind relieving him of duty because he either A) was injured in a case as an adult (despite having suffered much more grievous injuries as a minor) or B) failing to be there for Batman when Batman wanted him there (Note "wanted", not necessarily "needed"), depending on whether you're reading the original or the modified version of the scene.
The "firing" depicts Bruce's control freak tendencies trumping his parental responsibilities to Dick, and is pretty much entirely reprehensible. Batman saying he's not prepared to take responsibility for Dick is one thing (Though should be very OOC) but to deny him the heroic identity he created for himself and earned the respect of much of heroic population with just comes across as spiteful.
This though is 1984, in DC terms a gentler time, one much less dependent on Batman being a mega-jerk to all and sundry (never mind his oldest son) for cheap drama, this is about people, a parent and the young man he adopted and raised.
From writer Doug Moench, and exquisite art team of Don Newton and Alfredo Alcala, I present, One Perfect Moment from Batman 368
Leafing through this issue again I wish I could post more of it, the art is absolutely beautiful, and the story a powerful one, but ones has to keep ones own rules.
Anyway, back to the plot at hand. Strawberry blond Jason has tried being Batman's sidekick but initially hasn't got a hero name of his own. Then he dyes his hair black and borrows a Robin costume, which infuriates Batman because it's not Jason's ID to use.
So Jason has switched back to his original costume, but keeps the black hair. He and Bruce have spent several pages trying to come up with new names... none of which work.

..we cut away to a scene involving Crazy Quilt setting up shop again, but that's not relevant to his sequence. Then we head back to...


Newton drawing Robin's = Love

And that was how it used to be done folks. Mutual respect, paternal pride in a son who has outgrown his original role and is ready to embrace a new one, whilst at the same time wanting to hand on his own legacy to the newest member of the family.
Yeah, that was worth losing to "You're FIRED Dick!" wasn't it... :(
Now comes the trickier part, telling his Dad..
It's important to remember that this is pre-Crisis, Jason Todd was also an orphaned acrobat, a genuinely nice kid, No street punk angst here.
Also that Batman would never DREAM of telling Dick (especially one over the age of 18) what heroic identity he could, or could not hold. It's a consistent flaw in the post-Crisis Jason Todd Mk2 universe that Bruce Wayne feels he has the right and authority to dictate what identity Dick uses, never mind relieving him of duty because he either A) was injured in a case as an adult (despite having suffered much more grievous injuries as a minor) or B) failing to be there for Batman when Batman wanted him there (Note "wanted", not necessarily "needed"), depending on whether you're reading the original or the modified version of the scene.
The "firing" depicts Bruce's control freak tendencies trumping his parental responsibilities to Dick, and is pretty much entirely reprehensible. Batman saying he's not prepared to take responsibility for Dick is one thing (Though should be very OOC) but to deny him the heroic identity he created for himself and earned the respect of much of heroic population with just comes across as spiteful.
This though is 1984, in DC terms a gentler time, one much less dependent on Batman being a mega-jerk to all and sundry (never mind his oldest son) for cheap drama, this is about people, a parent and the young man he adopted and raised.
From writer Doug Moench, and exquisite art team of Don Newton and Alfredo Alcala, I present, One Perfect Moment from Batman 368
Leafing through this issue again I wish I could post more of it, the art is absolutely beautiful, and the story a powerful one, but ones has to keep ones own rules.
Anyway, back to the plot at hand. Strawberry blond Jason has tried being Batman's sidekick but initially hasn't got a hero name of his own. Then he dyes his hair black and borrows a Robin costume, which infuriates Batman because it's not Jason's ID to use.
So Jason has switched back to his original costume, but keeps the black hair. He and Bruce have spent several pages trying to come up with new names... none of which work.
..we cut away to a scene involving Crazy Quilt setting up shop again, but that's not relevant to his sequence. Then we head back to...
Newton drawing Robin's = Love
And that was how it used to be done folks. Mutual respect, paternal pride in a son who has outgrown his original role and is ready to embrace a new one, whilst at the same time wanting to hand on his own legacy to the newest member of the family.
Yeah, that was worth losing to "You're FIRED Dick!" wasn't it... :(
no subject
Date: 2010-07-29 07:11 pm (UTC)"Looks like this is one time when a rose is NOT a rose by any other name..."
YEEEEEAAAAAAHHHHHHH
no subject
Date: 2010-07-29 07:38 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-07-29 07:43 pm (UTC)Whatever, Morrison.
Interesting to compare the relations between Jason and Dick here to the last time we see them in BftC (aka Crazed Gattman Jason) to Morrison's B&R (balding red-haired Red Hood Jason). They've come a long way.
no subject
Date: 2010-07-29 07:54 pm (UTC)yeah, totally. Absolutely :/
This is a perfect moment. I love it when the Bat-boys act like a proper family like this. It makes my heart happy.
no subject
Date: 2010-07-29 09:01 pm (UTC)Yeah, it's a shame this is no longer in continuity (or is it again? I tend to lose track) as it's much better than Batman being borderline sociopathic in his driving away of Dick.
no subject
Date: 2010-07-30 04:39 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-07-29 09:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-07-29 10:41 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-07-29 10:39 pm (UTC)Miss this Jay. Miss the caring Dick and Bruce showed each other. I need to go read some pre-Crisis Bats.
And okay, back to hating the first Crisis. Again. D:
Also, Morrison? You need to get your Jay continuities straight. *eyeroll*
no subject
Date: 2010-07-30 12:54 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-07-30 12:58 am (UTC)Out of curiosity, what issues are the post-crisis "relievings of duty" in?
* before reading the second and third word balloons I was all "what's mustard got to do with this??" :P. I think I even went back and read the previosu panels to see if I'd missed anything.
no subject
Date: 2010-07-30 04:13 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-07-30 04:41 pm (UTC)A shame I couldn't include the discussion that Bruce and Jason have immediately after this, where they discuss the fact that Jason has been given not just a legacy, but a repsonsibility, and acknowledging the fact that Dick has taken it upon himself to start from scratch again. (More or less)
no subject
Date: 2010-07-30 03:23 am (UTC)Okay, feel free to throw virtual objects at me. I'm ready!
no subject
Date: 2010-07-30 04:11 am (UTC)I guess I'm just an old, old school girl. Overly angsty Bats get on my nerves, possibly because there really is such a thing as too much angst, and the Batfamily filled that quota years ago.
no subject
Date: 2010-07-30 12:18 pm (UTC)Hm. What does it say about me if I say "both, please!"?
See why I like an angsty Batman? Glutton for punishment. :P
no subject
Date: 2010-07-30 02:03 pm (UTC)The problem with angsty-Bat is that is, IMHO, makes him seem insufferably juvenile and thus unfintely less admirable. The Batman who would irrationally fire Dick the way he did is not the same Batman who could empathise enough to take on Dick in the first place.
Essentially he abrogates repsonsibility for Dick because it's inconvenient to him, no matter how he tries to dress it up.
Ironically, with Jason Mk1, Bruce would have had a sort of claim to the Robin identity since he created it for his own training as a teenager. With Jason Mk2's timeline Robin is, and always has been, Dick's creation. Batman had no more right to say he couldn't be Robin than he would have to say that Clark couldn't be Superman, or Diana Wonder Woman.
Instead of a gradual shift, highlighting maturity in Dick, with Dick having learned independence from his college days, and his leadership of the Titans showing that he has a new role to fulfil, we have his father figure acting like a complete idiot, with the emotional maturity of a three year old shouting at him hysterically "If you won't play my way then you won't play at all... so there... Nyah!" it's only a wonder Dick didn't tell him to sod off an continue being Robin just to spite him.
no subject
Date: 2010-07-30 08:40 pm (UTC)To a certain extent, this is a Watsonian attempt to explain major differences in characterization, but is it feasible? Esp with the right Bruce-POV fanfic, probably a series of vignettes spanning several incarnations of Robin ...
no subject
Date: 2010-07-31 01:26 am (UTC)Bruce before the Crisis was an entirely different creature from Bruce after the crisis. And there was no good explanation for the change aside from the fact that the writers wanted to make the Bat family interactions 'edgier'.
In 1986, you had forty-some odd years of Bruce and Dick caring for each other, showing that caring, pretty much working together and hearing each other out and not being dicks to each other. I'm sorry, but there is no good in-continuity explanation for the abrupt change. Which is why a number of older Batman fans who still read Bat comics roll their eyes at the progression of the newer continuity.
Is what you're describing feasible? Imo, no. There isn't much that can explain the dividing line of the crisis except for, oh, the crisis itself making a bunch of DC characters suddenly OOC. Which is patently ridiculous, but you know, comics. *shrugs*
no subject
Date: 2010-07-30 05:21 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-07-30 05:46 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-07-30 07:09 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-07-31 01:07 am (UTC)Actually, it was a joke -- you have to have read the issue in question, and it was pretty funny. XD
no subject
Date: 2010-07-31 01:11 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-07-31 01:30 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-07-31 01:57 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-07-30 04:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-07-30 09:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-07-30 09:19 pm (UTC)"Cardinal" isn't bad, but it just wouldn't work for me because when I hear the word, my first thought it for the Roman Catholic role, not the bird.
no subject
Date: 2010-07-30 09:43 pm (UTC)So do I, but in both instances, whether religious or bird, one of the first things that comes to mind when I hear 'Cardinal' is 'Red', which is a prominent color in the Robin-costume.
no subject
Date: 2012-08-13 03:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-07-30 05:53 am (UTC)It's a) damn good art (I learned about Don Newton on SD), and b) entertainingly mildly purple prose. ("The atmosphere of the Batcave congeals awkwardly," is an /awesomely/ ridiculous and yet wonderful line.)
Also, I heart Dick & Bruce-as-Dad stuff.
no subject
Date: 2010-07-30 09:20 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-07-30 04:16 pm (UTC)Bruce just acted like an idiot. I can understand his fear for Dick's safety, but after all they've faced together? Seemed a little weird to me. And taking away an identity of Dick's? Douchebag territory, Bruce!
I like seeing a rational Bruce who has his issues but can interact with his family without being a jerk all the time! :)
no subject
Date: 2010-07-30 05:30 pm (UTC)That's a very touching scene, well written and beautifully drawn. Is it too hard to produce more high quality comics like this today?
no subject
Date: 2010-09-28 12:04 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-08-12 09:44 pm (UTC)