Date: 2009-12-02 03:20 am (UTC)
joysweeper: Grand Admiral Thrawn steeples his hands in front of his face. (Thrawn Must Consider This Carefully)
From: [personal profile] joysweeper
It's not that the male villains can't be or aren't portrayed that way. It's that they're also portrayed as Evil Towers of Ominousness, and any sex appeal they have in that state is entirely apart from the writhing sensuality of the female villains.

For the male villains, sexuality is an accessory. Some pick it up casually, some base their entire image or purpose around it. For the female villains, sexuality is built into their entire premise. It's having skin. They'll do different things with it, and for some it's a much bigger part of their image than for others, but there are very few without it. Isard might be one, I suppose. Advances on Fel notwithstanding.

Date: 2009-12-02 03:23 am (UTC)
halialkers: (Default)
From: [personal profile] halialkers
What about when Bastila Shan went to the Dark Side? She didn't exactly turn all stripperific....and then Mary Marvel's evil costume arguably showed as much skin in Final Crisis as the heroine Wonder Woman's did.....

Date: 2009-12-02 03:38 am (UTC)
joysweeper: Grand Admiral Thrawn steeples his hands in front of his face. (Thrawn Must Consider This Carefully)
From: [personal profile] joysweeper
Angry Underwear. And did Wonder Woman get upskirt shots or grab a phallic rod with a look of bliss in Countdown?

Sexuality is always innate to women in comics just in general. Yes, the heroines are skimpy too, I'm not arguing that. I'm pointing out that in comparison to how crucial an element sex is in the men, sex is much more essential to the characters who happen to be women. Bad guys even moreso than good guys.

And I'll peace out here, since it's too late at night for this. Here I promised myself I wouldn't get into arguments about feminism...

Date: 2009-12-02 05:14 am (UTC)
kiplingkat: (Default)
From: [personal profile] kiplingkat
It's true, Moonstone, Goblin Queen, White Queen, etc. but I think it is more indicative of men's feeling about sex and women. It is assumed that an "evil woman" would automatically exploit men's "weakness" for women and sex and therefore gain power over them by hurting them in a place where they feel vulnerable.

Which is just sexist as all hell, on every single level.

Date: 2009-12-02 05:27 am (UTC)
crabby_lioness: (Default)
From: [personal profile] crabby_lioness
The same thing has been noted historically when men write about women rulers. They always sex them up, even when there's no evidence to support that premise.

Date: 2009-12-03 11:04 am (UTC)
greenmask: (Default)
From: [personal profile] greenmask
I'd wonder if it wasn't a power thing too; women are 'supposed' to be supplicant in sex and therefore in a sexual situation men are always "winning". Powerful men, or a majority of men in a patriarchal society, may feel (subconsciously?) threatened by an undeniably powerful woman (Queen, President, Empress, Tower of Psychic Ability..) and therefore introduce a strongly sexual element to her history. Thus, if they met her, they would win because she would allow them to penetrate her.

It is rapey and gross, though, so I hope my armchair is full of bad psychology.

Profile

scans_daily: (Default)
Scans Daily

Extras

Founded by girl geeks and members of the slash fandom, [community profile] scans_daily strives to provide an atmosphere which is LGBTQ-friendly, anti-racist, anti-ableist, woman-friendly and otherwise discrimination and harassment free.

Bottom line: If slash, feminism or anti-oppressive practice makes you react negatively, [community profile] scans_daily is probably not for you.

Please read the community ethos and rules before posting or commenting.

June 2025

S M T W T F S
1 2 34567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930     

Most Popular Tags