Well, fellow scans_daily members, you have voted. In accordance with the wishes of the majority, I will now post an unusual 1953 story (not 1948 story as I originally thought - I really should check the dates beforehand) where a 16-year-old girl marries a 19-year-old guy, sleeps with him, has second thoughts about the whole marriage thing and runs off to enlist in the army when her brush with marriage becomes fodder for town gossip. And that's just the first three pages.

A bit of background is necessary. The story originally appeared in a comic punished by St. John Publishing company. St. John's romance comics were known for being a bit more risque (by the standards of the time) than other romance comics, and for *gasp* having female writers every once in a while. While it would be a stretch to call those comics lost masterpieces, they stick out because they often sidestep or outright avoid the many cliches that plagued romance comics.
Another important note is that, at the time this comic was published, women weren't allowed to enlist in the regular army. Instead, they had to enlist in Women's Army Corps. Originally introduced during World War II. While WAC's creation was controversial, it proved to be effective enough to survive through three wars until 1978, when women were integrated into regular military.
And now, with the background out of the way, lets get on with the show.
The following story originally appeared in Teen-Age Temptation #3. Writing by Dana Dutch, art by Matt Baker (which, interestingly, means that the story had an all-minority creative team).








And, as a bonus - some 1940s jokes (from the same issue):

Tune in next time as we delve behind the meme and take a look at the totally heterosexual adventures of Toni Gay and her boyfriend, Butch Dykeman.

A bit of background is necessary. The story originally appeared in a comic punished by St. John Publishing company. St. John's romance comics were known for being a bit more risque (by the standards of the time) than other romance comics, and for *gasp* having female writers every once in a while. While it would be a stretch to call those comics lost masterpieces, they stick out because they often sidestep or outright avoid the many cliches that plagued romance comics.
Another important note is that, at the time this comic was published, women weren't allowed to enlist in the regular army. Instead, they had to enlist in Women's Army Corps. Originally introduced during World War II. While WAC's creation was controversial, it proved to be effective enough to survive through three wars until 1978, when women were integrated into regular military.
And now, with the background out of the way, lets get on with the show.
The following story originally appeared in Teen-Age Temptation #3. Writing by Dana Dutch, art by Matt Baker (which, interestingly, means that the story had an all-minority creative team).








And, as a bonus - some 1940s jokes (from the same issue):

Tune in next time as we delve behind the meme and take a look at the totally heterosexual adventures of Toni Gay and her boyfriend, Butch Dykeman.
no subject
Date: 2011-02-09 06:14 pm (UTC). . . what?
No, really. What?
There's obviously some kind of slang meaning for at least one of those words, but . . . I can't think of any that make sense. I'd rather be tight than be President.
What.
no subject
Date: 2011-02-09 06:28 pm (UTC)"Tight" can also mean drunk (as in "He's tight"), so in this case, the person is suggesting that unlike Clay, they'd rather be inebriated than President.
Oh my aching sides...
no subject
Date: 2011-02-09 10:20 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-02-10 01:23 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-02-09 06:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-02-09 06:30 pm (UTC)That last one is more like a Zen koan than a joke though.
no subject
Date: 2011-02-09 09:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-02-09 07:49 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-02-09 06:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-02-09 10:11 pm (UTC)ps Haruhi icon! <3 <3 <3
no subject
Date: 2011-02-09 10:26 pm (UTC)Haruhi ♥
no subject
Date: 2011-02-10 01:20 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-02-09 06:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-02-09 07:00 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-02-09 07:04 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-02-09 07:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-02-09 07:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-02-09 07:53 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-02-09 08:09 pm (UTC)Which in ye olden dayes = slut shaming.
no subject
Date: 2011-02-09 09:09 pm (UTC)So, realistic? Yeah. The only thing here I see as the least bit remarkable is the protagonists' maturity at the end. Mom never had that much.
no subject
Date: 2011-02-09 10:28 pm (UTC)"I got a bad reputation because of my hastily-annulled-but-legal marriage" can be read, and I believe was read at the time, to be code for "I got a bad reputation because I banged him like a screen door in a high wind."
no subject
Date: 2011-02-09 10:51 pm (UTC)Good point! A lot of stuff from the '40's/50's reads weirdly today, because we just don't understand the routine use of the "polite fiction."
It's like those old adverts for Lysol douche that are always circulating the internet. They get horrified laughs nowadays because people take them at face value and think you were supposed to use them as a cure for "unfeminine" vaginal odours, but if you read the ad copy carefully they were clearly marketed as a spermicide/abortifacient.
no subject
Date: 2011-02-10 08:27 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-02-10 08:37 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-02-09 07:44 pm (UTC)You misled us, strannik01! However this was actually pretty good, so I forgive you.
Yeah... About that.
Date: 2011-02-09 07:56 pm (UTC)Still, I figured that the story was still interesting enough, so people would forgive me - and I was right :)
Re: Yeah... About that.
Date: 2011-02-09 08:39 pm (UTC)Re: Yeah... About that.
Date: 2011-02-09 09:36 pm (UTC)Re: Yeah... About that.
Date: 2011-02-09 09:40 pm (UTC)Re: Yeah... About that.
Date: 2011-02-10 08:38 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-02-09 07:58 pm (UTC)Go 40s.
no subject
Date: 2011-02-09 08:10 pm (UTC)Neat comic, too.
no subject
Date: 2011-02-09 09:37 pm (UTC)Also this was a much better story than I expected, thanks for sharing!
no subject
Date: 2011-02-09 10:02 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-02-09 10:12 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-02-09 11:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-02-10 12:53 am (UTC)That is all.
no subject
Date: 2011-02-10 01:30 am (UTC)o_O
Good story. By page two I was already thinking, "No Janice! Don't be a fool! Hal's the right one!"
no subject
Date: 2011-02-10 03:11 am (UTC)Also, it is now my life's goal to somehow work each and every one of those jokes into conversation.
no subject
Date: 2011-02-10 03:40 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-02-10 08:40 am (UTC)Also - is that bugle joke a reference to french kissing? I know that for at least some types of horn, playing them involves sticking out your tongue.
no subject
Date: 2011-02-10 02:47 pm (UTC)Most likely. Anything else would be too suggestive for a joke book of the period.
no subject
Date: 2011-02-10 10:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-02-10 05:46 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-02-10 10:12 pm (UTC)