icon_uk: (Default)
[personal profile] icon_uk posting in [community profile] scans_daily
Now, normally I'm a little dense in spotting some of the more complex or abstract forms of sexism. One of the benefits of being a regular here is that I hope I've gotten better at it...



However, in this case, even for me it's sort of hard to miss.

Courtesy of Newsarama



That's just.... all kinds of wrong....

Also a quote which reminds me why I have so little time for Judd Winick (though I know many do have time for him, and mazel tov to them)

Nrama: Another character who recently came into Generation Lost is Bruce Wayne. You've written both Bruce and Dick, and I know you've said before that Dick has a little more humor to him. How is it writing Bruce as part of the JLI, surrounded by characters who make readers laugh?

Winick: Something I've always said about Dick Grayson is that when he's fighting the bad guys out in the field, there's no joking going on. He's not quipping. As Batman, Dick Grayson knows the role he has to play. But when he's around his friends, people that he knows, he makes jokes. He's still Dick Grayson, and I treat him like that. I got to do that a lot in Power Girl.

But when Bruce shows up, it's a different thing. He's not much older than these characters, but for them, it's almost like, "Dad's home." They have reverence for him. They know what he's capable of and they know his dedication.

It's the "when he's fighting the bad guys out in the field, there's no joking going on. He's not quipping" that I think I take some issue with, Dick is still very prone to quipping IMHO, and that's as it should be; His Batman is the Batman HE created, not Bruce's Batman.

Though this is part of my dislike of Dick continuing as Batman, I'm not sure does the character THAT many favours. Aside from him having no unique identity, in groups shots of DC characters he now is less likely to appear, since two Batmen is confusing and Bruce has precedence.

Re: warning, potential triggers discussed

Date: 2011-03-23 06:21 pm (UTC)
greenmask: (Default)
From: [personal profile] greenmask
I find it's often hard to tell if sex positivists (who label themselves as Sex Positivists, specifically) are just in favour of sex, or in favour of people being at peace with their own sexuality (which may be conservative, or vanilla, or sparse, or something that is a private matter). I'd imagine that, like feminism, it's a term that means way different stuff to different people. Stupid language!

I get that people who like to have more sex than is considered average, and outside traditional guidelines will likely have more investment in the political idea of sex positivity, of course. But.. yeah, it's suuuuuper tricky to set down guidelines that can cover EVERYONE when "society" as a whole is so varied and mired in all that historical blahblahblah!

Profile

scans_daily: (Default)
Scans Daily

Extras

Founded by girl geeks and members of the slash fandom, [community profile] scans_daily strives to provide an atmosphere which is LGBTQ-friendly, anti-racist, anti-ableist, woman-friendly and otherwise discrimination and harassment free.

Bottom line: If slash, feminism or anti-oppressive practice makes you react negatively, [community profile] scans_daily is probably not for you.

Please read the community ethos and rules before posting or commenting.

May 2025

S M T W T F S
     1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 1314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Most Popular Tags