superfangirl1: (Default)
[personal profile] superfangirl1 posting in [community profile] scans_daily



Superman just wants to have a chat with Starfire, but things are never really that simple in comics, are they?









Isabel tells everybody to chill and just talk instead of keep on fighting.



Joker's diabolical plans for Jason is framing him with looking like he overdose Isabel with drugs. Which of course is taunting Jason about the circumstances concerning his own mother's death.

Date: 2012-11-22 05:42 am (UTC)
shadowpsykie: Information (Default)
From: [personal profile] shadowpsykie
fun issue. it must irk Jason just a tad that Bruce vouched for him. "Damnit dad! i can handle this on my own"

also... I really hope Jason and Barbara give Joker SUCH a beat down...

Date: 2012-11-22 06:27 am (UTC)
From: [personal profile] darkknightjrk
also... I really hope Jason and Barbara give Joker SUCH a beat down...

This classic scene comes immediately to mind...

Date: 2012-11-22 06:37 am (UTC)
shadowpsykie: Information (Default)
From: [personal profile] shadowpsykie
Yes..... Yesssssds.this....this must happen... Maybe have Harley join them too...

Date: 2012-11-22 06:54 am (UTC)
From: [personal profile] darkknightjrk
Hell, the ideal end of that story would probably be the whole Bat-Family just enveloping Joker in a punching circle like in Death Proof.

Date: 2012-11-22 07:03 am (UTC)
shadowpsykie: Information (Default)
From: [personal profile] shadowpsykie
hmmm that would be better than he deserves... but yes.... yes...

i should watch that movie...

Date: 2012-11-22 07:23 am (UTC)
From: [personal profile] darkknightjrk
Yes you should--Grindhouse in general's a really fun experience. :D

Date: 2012-11-22 04:41 pm (UTC)
silverhammerman: (Default)
From: [personal profile] silverhammerman
I feel like I'm in the minority here, but I didn't care for Deathproof at all. I enjoyed Planet Terror Deathproof just didn't do it for me.
The beat down at the end was cool, buying general the film was the first hint to me that Tarantino was getting a bit up his own ass. The first half was plodding and incredibly boring, I don't care if it was a deliberate reflection of the kind of crap that was in the movies Tarantino was homaging, it was still unforgivably boring. And while they were cool, they send batch of would be victims was incredibly unlikable. Taking that car out to play a dangerous and irresponsible game with no intention of buying, and then leaving the friend with the rapist from Kill Bill and implying to him that she'll have sex with him. I was just not inboard at all.
Did not enjoy it.

Date: 2012-11-23 01:24 am (UTC)
From: [personal profile] darkknightjrk
Actually, I think you might be in the majority there. There isn't a whole lot of love for Death Proof, even among Tarantino fans, mostly for the aforementioned boring first half--which I didn't find all that boring due to the actors involved (the lapdance sequence certainly didn't hurt).

Date: 2012-11-22 08:52 am (UTC)
mrstatham: (Default)
From: [personal profile] mrstatham
Yeah, Stuntman Mike really kind of earns the beatdown. I do love how he basically starts shitting bricks the second they come after him - Definitely not my favourite Tarantino movie, but it's still a lot of fun.

Date: 2012-11-22 01:03 pm (UTC)
eyz: (Default)
From: [personal profile] eyz
YEAH!

Date: 2012-11-22 05:52 am (UTC)
ensiform: (Default)
From: [personal profile] ensiform
Art unappealing. Same old same old "heroes fight then grudgingly team up" thing is very cliched and unappealing. That baseball cap is unappealing. Superman's completely dickish personality is unappealing. Everything is unappealing.

Date: 2012-11-25 05:10 pm (UTC)
junipepper: (Default)
From: [personal profile] junipepper
This.

Date: 2012-11-22 06:05 am (UTC)
nate_abril96: (Default)
From: [personal profile] nate_abril96
This is how you not write Superman! Superman is a nice guy who just wants to do the right thing, but I don't know who the hell this arrogant douche is?

"I'm going to go out on a limb and predict: it does you no good whatsoever." Since when does Superman talk like that, he's supposed to be a nice guy. Also, if Red Hood and his gang did rank up a "multitude of crimes" like Superman says they did. He would take them down and make sure they go to court to pay for them, not look the other direction. I mean Jason and his gang have killed people in the past, sure they were bad people but they still killed them. Since when is Superman okay with killing?
Edited Date: 2012-11-22 06:07 am (UTC)

Date: 2012-11-22 06:32 am (UTC)
From: [personal profile] darkknightjrk
What's weird is that so far Lobdell's Superman is pretty much a nice guy--I can take his wanting to lock them up as anger about them relating to his encounters with Helspont, which did kind-of shake him.

As for his prediction, I don't think that's all that new, just something that wasn't done often in modern times because they pretty much watered Superman down after a while. This is no different from him play acting getting hurt when some crook threw his gun at Superman after unloading on him back in the 50s show.

Date: 2012-11-22 06:34 am (UTC)
From: [personal profile] thezmage
That Superman is gone. Has been since Flashpoint. This Superman dangles people out of windows and stuff like that.

Date: 2012-11-22 06:59 am (UTC)
From: [personal profile] darkknightjrk
He really hasn't done anything like that in the modern day, though. He did a lot more physical/grandstanding acts when he first started out, but he was just a twenty-one year-old who thought he could fix the corruption in Metropolis with his own two hands.

Date: 2012-11-22 09:28 am (UTC)
nate_abril96: (Default)
From: [personal profile] nate_abril96
I don't think that Superman's gone in the New 52, I just think that this is a bad characterization. He's still written well in Action Comics, in my opinion, and some of the time in the main Superman title. Also he only did that once in Action Comics, and that was suppose to be an homage to his first few years in publication. Don't forget that Siegel and Shuster's Superman was kind of a cocky jerk. Plus, when he did do that in Action Comics, he was still very young, and hadn't grown into the Superman that we all know and love yet. Finally, I think the reason why he was a bit more rougher, when he first started out, was to show how Clark would have turned out without the Kents to guide him through his years of Superman. So unlike the pre-New 52 Superman--who had the guidance of his parents--this Superman had to learn the ropes himself.

Date: 2012-11-22 11:12 am (UTC)
icon_uk: (Default)
From: [personal profile] icon_uk
When an established (anti)-hero reacts to Superman's presence by firing a pointy sticky at him, I'm tempted to give him a pass on the "Really?" reaction. You might as well lob a snowball at him.

Date: 2012-11-22 11:55 am (UTC)
icon_uk: (Default)
From: [personal profile] icon_uk
There's an interesting essay on Superman's nature over on tor.com

Superman Vs. the Myth of Aristocracy

Date: 2012-11-22 01:08 pm (UTC)
nate_abril96: (Default)
From: [personal profile] nate_abril96
I don't know Superman's reaction to Roy using his arrows seems kind of dickish to me; however, I will give him a free pass on him being annoyed that Jason and his gang want to fight him. You can tell that Superman has really been through these kinds of situations way too much, and is actually tired of fighting every hero he first meets.
Also, that essay about Superman was interesting indeed. It's the way that I see Superman and how he should act. It also gave me more appreciation for Byrne's vision of Krypton. My only complaint--as stated in the comments if this essay--is that it seems to imply that the only good Kryptonians are those whom are related to Superman (e.g. Supergirl, Jor-El, and Zor-El). It actually makes me wish that we can have Kryptonians whom are good, but are not related to Superman in any way. So New 52: bring back Christopher Kent (or Lor-Zod) and Van-Zee!!!

Date: 2012-11-23 10:58 pm (UTC)
icon_uk: (Default)
From: [personal profile] icon_uk
Chris worked best as Clark and Lois' kid. Alas, nu52 = no Lois = no Mama-Lois = no fun.

Date: 2012-11-23 02:24 am (UTC)
silverhammerman: (Default)
From: [personal profile] silverhammerman
Good essay. I always enjoy detailed examinations of Superman's character and motivations, and it forms a nice rebuttal to the tired "Superman is a fascist patriarchal figure blah blah...... And another thing..... blah blah..... Man of Steel, Woman of Kleenex hur hur..... Why doesn't he go after the real criminals? .... blah blah." crap.
The essay on that site about Batman is interesting too, though I'm not sure I agree with it quite as much. I don't necessarily think it's wrong, but it's a pretty pessimistic view of Batman, not really the sort of interpretation that you can easily apply to a sympathetic main character. I did find the point about the link between Batman and myths like King Arthur interesting though.

Date: 2012-11-25 07:17 pm (UTC)
theflames: The Joker best expression. (Default)
From: [personal profile] theflames
I found this comment by one of the readers of the essay really odd:

"This demonstrates why Superman is a uniquely American hero. He's an immigrant who personifies the idea that America is about new beginnings and new opportunities. A place where you're not defined by your past."

Superman is by the thinnest description 'an immigrant' - he came here as a baby. He's essentially 100% earth raised, his biological parents almost equalling up to surrogates. Which is why I find the characterisation of him being an 'outsider' really weird sometimes.

Date: 2012-11-22 06:12 am (UTC)
mrstatham: (Default)
From: [personal profile] mrstatham
Okay, so.. I'm kind of intrigued by the setup for the DOTF tie-in, but what struck me as hilarious was that of the three GCPD guys we can see, one seems to be flying in horizontally as opposed to doing any kind of a jump?

Unless, you know, that's foreshadowing for next month or whatever.

Date: 2012-11-22 06:24 am (UTC)
From: [personal profile] silicondream
Unless Jason's overdosing himself and that's his POV, I really have no idea what kind of perspective is going on behind him. Who are all these differently-sized people looking in different directions? Are they outside or inside? Is the one cop without the mask regretting the fact that he just stuck his face into a room (area? I dunno) full of tear gas grenades?

Date: 2012-11-22 06:33 am (UTC)
From: [personal profile] darkknightjrk
I'm thinking the one flying in is Max Payne. It's the only logical explanation.

Date: 2012-11-22 06:16 am (UTC)
littlepunkryo: (Default)
From: [personal profile] littlepunkryo
Wow Jason's helmet is way more hideous than usual.

Date: 2012-11-22 06:24 am (UTC)
beoweasel: (Default)
From: [personal profile] beoweasel
Getting so sick of this Joker.

Date: 2012-11-22 06:41 am (UTC)
From: [personal profile] darkknightjrk
Man, if they continue on this course they hinted at in the Superman Annual, and we get Superman, Starfire, Martian Manhunter, Hawkman, maybe Grifter and Voodoo versus Helspont, I'm gonna be so jazzed. XD

Date: 2012-11-22 07:52 am (UTC)
protogarrett: (Default)
From: [personal profile] protogarrett
Red Arrow looks TERRIBLE in that second page. Just... Jesus power-bottoming Christ who is this "artist"?

Date: 2012-11-23 12:47 am (UTC)
From: [personal profile] whitesycamore
And is it just me, or does Jason look like he's starting to transform into a werewolf on that last page?

No, that was my reaction too. But then my mind wandered to whether he was wearing a towel in that scene, and if there were any saucy semi-nude scenes elsewhere in the book.

Hey, they need to throw me a *little* something if I am to retain any interest in this series.

Date: 2012-11-22 08:17 am (UTC)
icon_uk: (Default)
From: [personal profile] icon_uk
I'm not even sure I see this Super as being that much of a douche, he's floating there, he's SUPERMAN, and Roy fires a metal tipped arrow at him, now I'm all for the little guy beating the big guy in such situations, but that level of insane optimism is akin to Golden Age Bucky picking up a baseball bat and going out to attack Galactus

Weirdly, I have more of a problem with Superman using his HEAT vision as a force blast. It wouldn't "Knock them on their asses", it would incinerate them

Date: 2012-11-22 09:43 am (UTC)
lieut_kettch: (Default)
From: [personal profile] lieut_kettch
Weirdly, I have more of a problem with Superman using his HEAT vision as a force blast. It wouldn't "Knock them on their asses", it would incinerate them

No weirder than the same way a lot of people (myself included) nitpick about Cyclops' optic blasts having a thermal effect.

Maybe he just heats the air in front of them and subsequent pressure differential knocks them off their feet.

Date: 2012-11-22 10:30 am (UTC)
icon_uk: (Default)
From: [personal profile] icon_uk
I usually give them a little leeway on Cyclops, since they are usually called "optic blasts", a vague term which doesn't actually tell you what their function is. (Yes, it should be pure kinetic energy, but a bit of friction will generate SOME heat.)

Heat vision is much, much more specific, and any time it's been used that I can recall, and that's over a good few decades now, it's shown as beams of red energy (or even invisible energy) which cause things to combust/melt, but are not forced away from him as a side effect.

This looks desperately like a writer waffling a little to fix a problem that an artist not understanding what a power is supposed to be able to do, caused, and frankly if you're not aware of how SUPERMAN'S powers work, what are you even doing in the genre? they're not exactly complicated.

Date: 2012-11-23 10:48 pm (UTC)
From: [personal profile] silicondream
I don't think he's directly knocking them down with the heat vision; I think he's using it to fuse the sand under them into glass so that they slip on it. Which, you know, nonsensical, feet on fire, but whatever.

Unless that shiny stuff under them is water and he forced it to the surface with steam pressure. Or something. Hard to tell with this art.

And I don't mind Superman being dismissive, but if he's not going to try to tactfully talk them into surrendering, I think it'd be more in character for him to just speed-disarm them at this point. That said, I have no idea what anyone else expected to accomplish in this fight either.

Date: 2012-11-22 03:31 pm (UTC)
blunderbuss: (Default)
From: [personal profile] blunderbuss
It's not so much optimism as it is sticking to your pride and dignity. So you're fighting a guy whom you don't stand a chance against; so, what, you're just bow your head and do what you're told just because Mr. Superman said so? Not to mention that his douchey attitude really is asking for a smack in the face.

Date: 2012-11-23 10:38 pm (UTC)
icon_uk: (Default)
From: [personal profile] icon_uk
You might want to save your finite supply of actual weapons for a situation where they will be of some use. Verbally snark all you like, in fact that would have impressed me more "You think I'd waste arrows on you? What would be the point of that?"

Date: 2012-11-22 11:39 am (UTC)
kurenai_tenka: (Default)
From: [personal profile] kurenai_tenka
Holy shit Roy's face on the second page may be the scariest thing I've ever seen.

Date: 2012-11-22 01:35 pm (UTC)
From: [personal profile] jlbarnett
It always irritates me when anti-heroes or jerkass type characters take offense at more straight up characters disliking them

Date: 2012-11-22 03:57 pm (UTC)
sun_man: this is Dick Grayson (Default)
From: [personal profile] sun_man
meh

Date: 2012-11-23 12:54 am (UTC)
From: [personal profile] whitesycamore
SD should consider banning one-word nothing comments. They're juvenile, and they don't contribute to either the discussion or a pleasant atmosphere.

Date: 2012-11-23 07:51 pm (UTC)
salinea: (mod hat)
From: [personal profile] salinea
We're not in the business of policing non-problematic or inflammatory language.

Date: 2012-11-25 12:31 pm (UTC)
From: [personal profile] whitesycamore
I think I confused sun_man with another poster who was in the habit of repeatedly leaving one single comment that said 'meh' on anything related to this title/character.

When it becomes regular, it *is* inflammatory. Because it's basically the equivalent of writing "I don't care about this. So I'll keep leaving annoying one-word comments until you stop posting it." Which is really quite rude in an interpersonal sense.

But as it happens, I don't think sun_man is the same person who does this habitually. I still think 'meh' is a stupid comment in general though, so if someone leaves it on any of my posts I'll let them know that. In a non-problematic or inflammatory way of course.

Date: 2012-11-23 02:34 am (UTC)
silverhammerman: (Default)
From: [personal profile] silverhammerman
Goodness gracious that shot of Roy's face on the second page is bad. Just really, really ugly, and the combination of the trucker hat with a mask/cowl that I'm still at a loss to explain (I thought he was just wearing a basic domino mask these days?), doesn't help matters.
Superman doesn't come off great here, but I do always like when he's shown as the heavy that he should be. I hate seeing the Worf Effect come into play to establish how cool and badass a character is supposed to be "They beat up lame old Superman, buy our book! It's so XTREME!"
And yeah, that last page is a hot mess. Just terrible. The TV is on the same level as the floor and not even at the same angle as the wall, and all of the cops seem to be doing completely unrelated things.
Edited Date: 2012-11-23 02:34 am (UTC)

Date: 2012-11-23 10:41 pm (UTC)
icon_uk: (Default)
From: [personal profile] icon_uk
Given that Jason recently openly shot a woman dead in Gotham (the vengeance obsessed crime boss woman) I'd have thought that "death by maybe possibly arranging for someone to overdose" would be a singularly low rent crime for the Joker to frame Jason with and the Blue Brothers level of reaction to it seems odd.

Date: 2012-11-25 05:58 am (UTC)
zyriex: Best Spiders Ever (Default)
From: [personal profile] zyriex
Out of curiosity that is Superman and not Superboy right? I can't exactly tell with this art.

Also, even if I could the instinctual cringe whenever this series's name pops up, it still doesn't interest me enough to think about buying it.

Profile

scans_daily: (Default)
Scans Daily

Extras

Founded by girl geeks and members of the slash fandom, [community profile] scans_daily strives to provide an atmosphere which is LGBTQ-friendly, anti-racist, anti-ableist, woman-friendly and otherwise discrimination and harassment free.

Bottom line: If slash, feminism or anti-oppressive practice makes you react negatively, [community profile] scans_daily is probably not for you.

Please read the community ethos and rules before posting or commenting.

June 2025

S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 2021
22232425262728
2930     

Most Popular Tags