So much of the issue is Doc Ock as Spidey trying to seal the deal with Mary Jane with the real Spider-Man's ghost (whose presence is unknown to Ock) as a witness.
The next day, MJ is attacked by some of Vulture's new henchmen, who throw her from the sky.
I like how the disturbing rape implications are addressed here with a firm "not gonna happen." I like how MJ, while she never quite figures it out, still knows something's off enough to never give Otto anything more then a peck on the cheek. And I like the reason Otto gives up at the end - because he gets Peter's feelings for MJ. He doesn't leave her until he genuinely starts caring for her.
well... it doesn't make that whole mental masturbation scene any better.... but yeah at least they don't leave teh whole "will he" or "Won't he" rape her dangling over our heads....
i am a little annoyed that it seems more like Carlye is the one who is piecing it together....
though i do LOVED Peter saying that he and MJ are soulmates....
Peter in Otto's body did tell Carlie "Ock and I have switched bodies!" She didn't believe him but she's the only one who heard that bit of information.
At least MJ suspects something funky is going on. Even if she can't quite piece it together. (It would be funny if she thought it was the Chameleon again.)
Yeah, I'm glad there's no incipient rape, but when they couple it with the mental voyeurism thing I have a "what do you want, a cookie?" reaction. I mean, yay Marvel for not having MJ violated physically, but....
The upside-down Raimi kiss is canon now. I can't remember a specific issue where Peter and MJ did that before in a comic but it's a pretty iconic image from a successful film series so I have no problem at all with that.
Well the good news is that Doc Ock didn't actually succeed in his attempts to seduce Mary Jane into bed. In fact, I was rather impressed that, due to having developed feelings for MJ herself, he did the right and honorable thing by letting her go--much to Ghost Peter and MJ's surprise--because of it. However...
1. Doc Ock, and this issue apparently, is making a similar argument that One Moment in Time used--that even though Peter and MJ love each other, they can never be together so long as Peter continues to be Spider-Man. It's an argument I didn't buy then, and an argument I don't buy now. Plus, the way this is set up now, even if Peter does get his body back and explains to MJ what really happened, this issue now establishes suggests MJ believed what "Peter" said was right regardless (though in [I]One Moment in Time[/I], she was the one who made the argument herself to Peter).
2. Even though Doc Ock is no longer going to sexually take advantage of MJ, he's still free to do so towards any other female supporting cast member, as when he starts to flirt with Salani Jaffrey in this issue. As Ghost Peter even points out, just because MJ is safe doesn't make it okay for SpOck to put other unsuspecting women to be in his cross-hairs.
3. Despite the fact that MJ acknowledges the fact that "Peter" is behaving like a completely different person, she STILL hasn't come to the conclusion that maybe "Peter" is actually an imposter. And this is the woman who is supposed to be Peter's soulmate who knows him better than anyone else and lived with him for years.
4. Speaking of which, this issue also pretty much confirms that Carlie does indeed suspect that "Peter" may in fact be Doc Ock based on what "Doc Ock" told her in Amazing Spider-Man #700. But does Carlie bother to tell MJ these suspicions? No. If SpOck and MJ dated for a two week period, that means that Carlie has known that MJ is potentially putting herself in danger all that time, yet hasn't said a single word. Correct me if I'm wrong but isn't Carlie biggest pet peeve is when friends and loved one lie and keep secrets from her, and wasn't that the reason she broke up with Peter in the first place?
5. If what that scene with Doc Ock recalling Peter's memories of his "sexy time" with MJ suggests, doesn't this also mean that Doc Ock pulled a Skip Westcott on Peter? Cause remember, it's not his body he's playing with, it's Peter's.
Yeeeah. I'm glad Ock is backing off, but DAMMIT I HATE HATE HATE the "you would never be safe with me I have to break up with you for your OWN GOOD" argument. Just, dammit. She is not a child. She is an adult, supposedly your equal, who is allowed to make informed decisions for herself about what constitutes acceptable risk. You do not get to decide what is too dangerous, and what is and is not worth it.
I know Ock is just scraping together an excuse, but then they have Peter AGREEING with him, implying Ock is the stronger man for "doing what he couldn't." HORSE HOCKEY. I'd be fine with this scene if Peter was going "thanks! But, um, you KNOW MJ isn't going to put up with that bullshit excuse for more than five seconds, right?")
You do not get to decide what is too dangerous, and what is and is not worth it.
Why not? If one half of a potential relationship decides it would be too dangerous and doesn't want to do it, why should the other half have the right to try and force a relationship? You can't have a good relationship unless both sides actually think it's agood idea.
He is making it all about her safety, though, "the only way to free you", etc. There are kinder ways to tell someone you can't handle the responsibility of bringing your lifestyle into their life. It's pretty passive-aggressive to be all, you couldn't handle it [because you might get murdered].
Considering that Peter lived though exactly that, he probably has that thought going through his mnd every time he's on a date, but I don't think he was talking about that here, though. It sounded more like "the reason we broke up before is still there and it always will be."
"But does Carlie bother to tell MJ these suspicions? No."
I guess you could say that Carlie would assume that she'd need more than a story and a gut feeling to make the case. This is a CSI person, after all. My guess is that now she's going to try to find a way to get definitive proof.
Oh, I'm sure that's how Carlie will defend herself, saying that she had to be 100% certain her hypothesis was correct. At the same time, though, it does make her out to a hypocritical and crappy friend to MJ, IMO, because she's basically put MJ at risk of Doc Ock's attempts to seduce her for two weeks and is also continuing putting at risk any one Peter cares about. And what I hope is that once Peter gets his body back and MJ learns the full truth, she gives Carlie a good piece of her mind over just how wrong she actually was in NOT telling her.
... at least they didn't try to joke how their relationship would be a failure.... nor do they succumb to low move having them be together while Oct is Peter....
Damn it. Now I have to get this book. This is a prime example of a writer who knows EXACTLY what he is doing. Slott is even taken his audience's abused history and expectations into account. Superior Spiderman is turning out to be a masterwork of craftsmanship.
Quite pleased to see this, I might actually consider picking up this series now, though I still think it's pretty uncool that Spider-Ock getting with MJ was ever even a possibility in the story. It remains skeevy as a plot element. I still don't like the implications of Ock getting together with any woman though, even if he gets together with someone who didn't know Peter before, I'm generally put out by the idea that Ock is using Peter's body for something that Peter doesn't want to do. And boy was that scene with Ock reliving Peter's memories with MJ uncomfortable. Really voyeuristic and gross. Glad that Slott's putting Ock on the path to heroism though.
As glad as I am that Ock is going to stay away from MJ, here's the problem I have with the story:
MJ wants to get back with Peter.
And she wouldn't want to do that if she had the slightest suspicion that he wasn't who he said he was, or that he was possessed, or any of the things that Wolverine suspected over in Avenging.
Slott is still writing her like an idiot, when he should be writing her as the person who saw through the Chameleon's Peter-disguise almost IMMEDIATELY.
And even though Peter describes MJ as his soulmate here which should make me happy since they're one of my favorite comic book couples, I just can't get over the fact that MJ, who is in love with Peter and whom Peter thinks of as his soulmate, hasn't realized that Ock!Spiderman isn't Peter.
She reconized the Chameleon when he was pretending to be Peter, so what the hell...
So MJ wants to get back with Peter now he's being meat-puppeted by Ock. And Ock is superior to Peter because he can let MJ go, which Peter never could (until OMD, whatever).
Why does Peter say that he could never do what Otto did? Because I'm pretty sure that he's (along with a significant number of male superheroes) refused to pursue a relationship with people "for their own good" before. This isn't a new idea or anything, it's sort of tedious when superheroes decide that unilaterally isolating themselves from everyone is a good way to keep people safe.
This book does a good job of lowering expectations. Sure, this "for your own good" business is played out and sort of paternalistic, but at least MJ's not getting raped!
Founded by girl geeks and members of the slash fandom, scans_daily strives to provide an atmosphere which is LGBTQ-friendly, anti-racist, anti-ableist, woman-friendly and otherwise discrimination and harassment free.
Bottom line: If slash, feminism or anti-oppressive practice makes you react negatively, scans_daily is probably not for you.
no subject
Date: 2013-01-30 04:41 pm (UTC)I like how the disturbing rape implications are addressed here with a firm "not gonna happen." I like how MJ, while she never quite figures it out, still knows something's off enough to never give Otto anything more then a peck on the cheek. And I like the reason Otto gives up at the end - because he gets Peter's feelings for MJ. He doesn't leave her until he genuinely starts caring for her.
no subject
Date: 2013-01-30 04:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-01-30 04:57 pm (UTC)And I know some people who have commented before who will be relieved to find this out.
no subject
Date: 2013-02-03 08:38 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-02-03 10:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-01-30 05:02 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-01-30 05:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-01-30 05:20 pm (UTC)i am a little annoyed that it seems more like Carlye is the one who is piecing it together....
though i do LOVED Peter saying that he and MJ are soulmates....
no subject
Date: 2013-01-30 05:28 pm (UTC)At least MJ suspects something funky is going on. Even if she can't quite piece it together. (It would be funny if she thought it was the Chameleon again.)
no subject
Date: 2013-01-30 05:29 pm (UTC)But seeing how she's suspicious because Pete-as-Ock told her it was really him, it's understandable.
no subject
Date: 2013-01-31 01:17 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-01-30 05:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-01-30 05:45 pm (UTC)1. Doc Ock, and this issue apparently, is making a similar argument that One Moment in Time used--that even though Peter and MJ love each other, they can never be together so long as Peter continues to be Spider-Man. It's an argument I didn't buy then, and an argument I don't buy now. Plus, the way this is set up now, even if Peter does get his body back and explains to MJ what really happened, this issue now establishes suggests MJ believed what "Peter" said was right regardless (though in [I]One Moment in Time[/I], she was the one who made the argument herself to Peter).
2. Even though Doc Ock is no longer going to sexually take advantage of MJ, he's still free to do so towards any other female supporting cast member, as when he starts to flirt with Salani Jaffrey in this issue. As Ghost Peter even points out, just because MJ is safe doesn't make it okay for SpOck to put other unsuspecting women to be in his cross-hairs.
3. Despite the fact that MJ acknowledges the fact that "Peter" is behaving like a completely different person, she STILL hasn't come to the conclusion that maybe "Peter" is actually an imposter. And this is the woman who is supposed to be Peter's soulmate who knows him better than anyone else and lived with him for years.
4. Speaking of which, this issue also pretty much confirms that Carlie does indeed suspect that "Peter" may in fact be Doc Ock based on what "Doc Ock" told her in Amazing Spider-Man #700. But does Carlie bother to tell MJ these suspicions? No. If SpOck and MJ dated for a two week period, that means that Carlie has known that MJ is potentially putting herself in danger all that time, yet hasn't said a single word. Correct me if I'm wrong but isn't Carlie biggest pet peeve is when friends and loved one lie and keep secrets from her, and wasn't that the reason she broke up with Peter in the first place?
5. If what that scene with Doc Ock recalling Peter's memories of his "sexy time" with MJ suggests, doesn't this also mean that Doc Ock pulled a Skip Westcott on Peter? Cause remember, it's not his body he's playing with, it's Peter's.
no subject
Date: 2013-01-30 06:05 pm (UTC)I know Ock is just scraping together an excuse, but then they have Peter AGREEING with him, implying Ock is the stronger man for "doing what he couldn't." HORSE HOCKEY. I'd be fine with this scene if Peter was going "thanks! But, um, you KNOW MJ isn't going to put up with that bullshit excuse for more than five seconds, right?")
no subject
Date: 2013-01-30 06:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-01-30 06:41 pm (UTC)Why not? If one half of a potential relationship decides it would be too dangerous and doesn't want to do it, why should the other half have the right to try and force a relationship? You can't have a good relationship unless both sides actually think it's agood idea.
no subject
Date: 2013-01-30 09:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-01-31 12:01 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-01-30 06:43 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-02-01 07:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-01-30 06:53 pm (UTC)I guess you could say that Carlie would assume that she'd need more than a story and a gut feeling to make the case. This is a CSI person, after all. My guess is that now she's going to try to find a way to get definitive proof.
no subject
Date: 2013-01-30 09:17 pm (UTC)Well...
Date: 2013-01-30 05:46 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-01-30 06:42 pm (UTC)Marvel lost my money with the train wreck of ASM 700 & Slott acting like a petulant child on Twitter.
Mod Note
Date: 2013-01-30 07:36 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-01-30 07:38 pm (UTC)+1 for Marvel!
...sadly
no subject
Date: 2013-01-31 07:22 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-01-30 07:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-01-30 08:15 pm (UTC)I still don't like the implications of Ock getting together with any woman though, even if he gets together with someone who didn't know Peter before, I'm generally put out by the idea that Ock is using Peter's body for something that Peter doesn't want to do.
And boy was that scene with Ock reliving Peter's memories with MJ uncomfortable. Really voyeuristic and gross.
Glad that Slott's putting Ock on the path to heroism though.
no subject
Date: 2013-01-30 09:16 pm (UTC)Also, "Someone is always going to need Spider-Man to save them" is why I never totally buy any "Peter tries to get rid of his powers" story.
no subject
Date: 2013-01-30 11:30 pm (UTC)Still not buying it though.
no subject
Date: 2013-01-30 11:44 pm (UTC)MJ wants to get back with Peter.
And she wouldn't want to do that if she had the slightest suspicion that he wasn't who he said he was, or that he was possessed, or any of the things that Wolverine suspected over in Avenging.
Slott is still writing her like an idiot, when he should be writing her as the person who saw through the Chameleon's Peter-disguise almost IMMEDIATELY.
no subject
Date: 2013-01-31 12:43 am (UTC)And even though Peter describes MJ as his soulmate here which should make me happy since they're one of my favorite comic book couples, I just can't get over the fact that MJ, who is in love with Peter and whom Peter thinks of as his soulmate, hasn't realized that Ock!Spiderman isn't Peter.
She reconized the Chameleon when he was pretending to be Peter, so what the hell...
no subject
Date: 2013-01-31 03:02 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-01-31 03:24 am (UTC)Yeah, sure, as if.
no subject
Date: 2013-01-31 03:06 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-01-31 05:39 am (UTC)This book does a good job of lowering expectations. Sure, this "for your own good" business is played out and sort of paternalistic, but at least MJ's not getting raped!