![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
The first time Dick Grayson tried to get married, the priest blew up before he could complete the vows. The Batman Family finds this funny.
First let me give you some context...

So naturally everyone this time around is in anticipation on if the priest will finish his sentence...

Then everyone JOKES ABOUT IT!!!!

I would expect more from Donna Troy...

REALLY Tim???
Still "What kind of weddings do you people go to" is one of the funniest lines of the comic.

You would think that the death of a minister who was simply in the wrong place, at the wrong time, marrying the wrong people would be treated more sensitively.
First let me give you some context...

So naturally everyone this time around is in anticipation on if the priest will finish his sentence...

Then everyone JOKES ABOUT IT!!!!

I would expect more from Donna Troy...

REALLY Tim???
Still "What kind of weddings do you people go to" is one of the funniest lines of the comic.

You would think that the death of a minister who was simply in the wrong place, at the wrong time, marrying the wrong people would be treated more sensitively.
Exploding Ministers
Date: 2009-07-05 08:23 am (UTC)Re: Exploding Ministers
Date: 2009-07-05 09:15 am (UTC)Hi! Welcome to s_d. We don't bite
muchRe: Exploding Ministers
Date: 2009-07-05 09:34 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-05 08:27 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-05 05:47 pm (UTC)Don't tell my heart
My achy-breaky heart
I just don't think it understands...
no subject
Date: 2009-07-05 09:32 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-05 02:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-05 02:40 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2009-07-05 09:41 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-05 10:12 am (UTC)I'm sorry. I'm so sorry.
Date: 2009-07-05 02:21 pm (UTC)Re: I'm sorry. I'm so sorry.
From:Re: I'm sorry. I'm so sorry.
From:no subject
Date: 2009-07-05 10:07 am (UTC)Also: Greg Land art.
no subject
Date: 2009-07-06 02:43 am (UTC)Or maybe it's just that thing on Dick's head?
no subject
Date: 2009-07-05 11:03 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-05 12:23 pm (UTC)A woman is suspected of being a black widow killer, as something like three of her wealthy young husbands have died in mysterious accidents. She also has a young son who has lost at least two dads.
Dick wants to investigate, and Bruce points out, apparently to Dick's surprise, that he IS the heir to the Wayne fortune (Be warned, Dick has an IQ roughly equivalent to a cold bowl of chicken soup in this story).
So what does Dick, trained detective, do? Rather than investigate the thing as he has been trained for years, he decides that the only way to find out what's going on is to marry her and see if she tries to kill him.
So he sweeps her off her feet, bonds with her son, and proposes to her. She accepts (It's never addressed, but this woman has some fairly serious "needy" issues IMHO).
Ultimately, on the honeymoon (which Dick spends sleeping on the couch because... well, apparently that would be to icky even for this story), we find out that it's not the wife who is the killer, but the woman we see Roy chatting up, the brides best friend who is consumed with jealousy that her friend wants to spend time with anyone other than her.
After psycho kinda-lesbian bitch is arrested, Dick reveals to his bride that they were never legally married, as he had Babs delay the filing of the marriage licence. He DOES offer to stay with her out of loyalty, and he likes her, but she agrees to do it only if he can promise her that he doesn't have any OTHER secrets. He can't do that so they split.
Where do I begin to say why I think this story REEKS? The whole "Marriage is the only way to do this" assumption is so seriously flawed in the first instance that it boggles the mind. The notion that DICK would come up with such a cold blooded plan, Bruce should have been calling THIS one out of bounds in terms of emotional manipulation. And what Dick does to the kid in question is so OOC as to defy belief. A kid who's lost at least two fathers, is used as a chesspiece by a guy motivated by parental loss? No way.
Sadly it IS still canon.
no subject
Date: 2009-07-05 01:38 pm (UTC)A kid who's lost at least two fathers, is used as a chesspiece by a guy motivated by parental loss?
The kid only lost one father, his. His mother's other husbands both died during the honeymoons, and IIRC he's not mentioned as having been as close to them as he was to Dick. As for Dick's behaviour regarding the child, his sympathy toward him and the fact that he genuinely cares for him is shown and told both rather clearly imo; where do you see he tries to manipulate the child?
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2009-07-05 05:15 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2009-07-05 05:55 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2009-07-05 07:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-05 10:15 pm (UTC)While it didn't work that well for WCW (who liked to use it on things that had happened just a couple of weeks--or even HOURS--before), it's actually a fairly elegant way to deal with things in comics, where more time passes. You just do a year or two of stories that wouldn't have any logical reason to reference it, and then quietly tell the editors not to allow writers to refer to it from there on out. No need for writing a story to hamhandedly erase it, you just pretend it's an "imaginary story" and act as if it never happened.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2009-07-06 02:41 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-05 01:55 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-05 02:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-05 06:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-05 07:25 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From: